similar to: multi-homed server: trouble hiding private interfaces

I'm running Samba 3.0.7 on Mandrakelinux 9.2 as a PDC, with a few shares from the PDC and more on a separate Mandrakelinux 10.0 member file server, also running Samba 3.0.7. The passdb backend is LDAP and clients are all Windows XP Professional SP1. Except for the below, everything works great! We make heavy use of offline files, and with Windows XP SP1, all is well. However, when I

Hi all, I have been using tinc successfully for a while now. However, I need to do something different from my normal setup, and i am getting the feeling I am doing something obvious wrong. What I want to do is hookup 5 distant linux routers into one bigger network, Since I need to transmit both unicast and multicast traffic, the VPN network has to be in "Mode = switch" [Assumption

Most of my experience until recently has been in Asterisk 1.2, and I am just starting to make use of Asterisk 11 for new systems. I have a question about using SIP on a multi-homed machine. I have a customer who wants an Asterisk box with two network interfaces: one on the public Internet (no NAT), and one on a private LAN. The box will not do any IP forwarding between interfaces. They want to

I have CentOS 4 running on an old (early model) p3 with 64 MB RAM. It is acting as a router and firewall for my LAN. CentOS is doing a really good job with Shorewall + DHCPd - on a 10 Mbps cable modem, I see ~ 9.7 Mbps of throughput even when numerous tcp streams to different LAN hosts are running. I would like to add a virtual interface to one of my LAN interfaces. My LAN interface

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:44 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 17/05/2020 23:10, Michael Jones wrote: > > Why? > Amongst others, you may get: > > Slow / Failed logins > Replication issues > Group policy access issues > login script issues > > A multi-homed DC (for whatever reason) is a bad idea. > > Rowland > I

Dear all, as I am currently planning a network with Samba AD DC I was wondering if you can recommend any best practice for a multi-homed AD DC. My current plan is to have one NIC for Samba services and a second one dedicated to management functions (e.g. SSH) on a separate network restricted to admin users. In a testbed scenario I already discovered that once both adapters exist, samba seems to

On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 1:43 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 17/05/2020 19:30, Johannes Engel via samba wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > as I am currently planning a network with Samba AD DC I was wondering if > > you can recommend any best practice for a multi-homed AD DC. > > Best practise is: do not multi-home a DC. >

Hi, I connected a multi-homed Win95 machine (carrot, see below) to two networks (ankh-net and morpork-net) which a multi-homed Linux machine running Samba 1.9.18p10 (or whatever the latest <2 is) was also connected to (vimes) and wanted to see which of the two interfaces Win95 would pick... --------------------------------- ankh-net 134.225.241.0/24 | |

>From a security standpoint, if the default keytab (/etc/krb5.keytab) contains only ONE principal, does it matter if GSSAPIStrictAcceptorCheck is set to "yes" or "no"? My company uses an internally built OpenSSH package that includes the GSSAPI Key Exchange patch. Because we have 1000s of hosts, we need to use a "standard" sshd_config file that works for the

Hey all, I'm experiencing a problem with chan_sip on a multi-homed machine. The machine has 1 interface to the rest of the world and 1 interface on a local network. The local network has public IP-addresses, though, and the IP-addresses of both interfaces are reachable from the outside world, but by default, outgoing traffic from that machine to the outside world will have the IP-address of

I tried to implement a multi-homed box using this faq 4.2.1 split access http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html But it says table is invalid. Can someone tell me what the difference is in Centos? I assume the FAQ is leaving out how to add tables to the iproute files? I am trying to have eth0 and eth1 service two different subnets for apache and not act as a

On 17/05/2020 19:30, Johannes Engel via samba wrote: > Dear all, > > as I am currently planning a network with Samba AD DC I was wondering if > you can recommend any best practice for a multi-homed AD DC. Best practise is: do not multi-home a DC. Rowland

Hi, (I think I posted this a few weeks ago, but I haven't found the solution and had no replies.) I have a multi-homed server, one interface of which is on the same subnet as the majority of clients and the other is on a different one (but still reachable, through a router). When connecting to the server, it seems to be chance which one of these interfaces I get. I believe DNS servers

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 Summary: Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment. Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P4 Component: iptables

Can someone refer me to any links which explain how to configure a stand alone linux host (not a router) with 2 ISP links in such a way that the traffic is distributed between the 2 ISPs ? Thank you, _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

I have a machine that has two interfaces on the same host, The subnets of each interface is different. SMBD and NMBD start allright other mchines on the Neighborhood ar found, but the machine never shows up on a Neighborhood. samba release is 2.0.6 and OS is HP-UX is 11.00 -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

I have a server here with 4 network interfaces (DEC Unix). All the Win95 clients are on the same 4 subnets as these 4 interfaces. One thing I noticed the other day is that the majority of the clients do not connect to the server's interface on the same subnet as the client. This is making unecessary use of our router. I'm wondering how I can force the clients to connect to the local

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com --- Comment #3 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-21

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 --- Comment #4 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-08 23:33:07 CEST --- As noted, #2 is solved already. Also, /128 will no longer print (commit 945353a2). But your #1 makes little sense to me: discovery.razor.cloudmark.com/22. How do you know that EVERY IP returned from a DNS lookup is always going to be a /22 mask?

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 --- Comment #5 from - <kd6lvw at yahoo.com> 2013-07-09 03:45:06 CEST --- Re: Comment #4. One doesn't know what the addresses are until they are retrieved from the DNS. The point is that the routines which generate the rules are NOT checking the values AFTER the CIDR netmask is applied to eliminate POST-MASK duplicate answers. The