similar to: Problem with "mangling method=hash"

Hi all, I run samba 3.6.6 from debian wheezy (version 3.6.6) and i am experiencing some troubles with file name mangling. If i try "dir /x" on a mapped folder it gives me unexpected mangled names: the name mangling matches only the first character and not the first 5 as i expect. For example: if the long file name is LONGFILENAME.TXT, i expect the mangled sholud be something like

I've installed Samba 3.0.7 (stock Debian package), but I'm having some wierd problems with name mangling. The relevant lines in smb.conf are: preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes mangled names = yes mangle prefix = 5 mangling method = hash2 In a share, I did "touch test-file.GHO" to create a long filename. When I do a "dir" under DOS,

I just want to warn people that want to use the new hashing algorithm for mangled names. And that note should also be put in the man page IMO. You must understand that changing the hashing algorithm on a production server may have unwanted side effects (this is why we maintain by default hash and not hash2 and why it was not back ported to 2.2 initially). Windows clients may save all around

Hi, using samba 2.2.5-UL (on a SuSE-SLOX-System) we have to mangle long pathnames to short ones. We need this for some of our apps which generate batch-files (*.bat) for compilation. Normally this works correctly, exept for a directory named "Only_for_generation". This directory is mangled into "Only_~%0" (it' s NULL at the end). And this is the problem. In

> m:\worksp~1, when I have this share on a windows machine, it works > fine. Move it to my samba machine and it doesn't. This is what my This is probably your problem. You override the default mangling method in samba3 from hash2 to hash. hash2 behaves more like Windows mangling. > mangling method = hash Either take this line out or change it to hash2. You may need to

Hi After struggling with this for a couple of days it's time to ask for help. We have two samba servers one is on Solaris 8 running Version 2.2.8a and one on Solaris 10 running Version 3.0.28 I am having a problem with samba printing from the Solaris 10 samba server. I can print from the machine itself using lpr directly. I can print from a windows machine using lpr printing to that server

> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:18:36 +0200 > From: Pascal Schelcher <pascal.schelcher@free.fr> > To: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: [Samba] Mangled Names of Long File Name with 2.2.4 > > Hello, > > I have got samba-2.2.4 installed. > The Documentation of Samba says that the probability of a clash of mangled >

Hi, I'm cross-posting here from serverfault.com in case anyone can help. I just found a similar question on askubuntu.com also without an answer. Switched recently from W2K3 to Samba4.0.9/CentOS6.4 for our fileshare for WinXP clients. Have an ancient (1995!) piece of software that uses 8.3 filename format. After the switch, long filenames became useless in the context of the

Hi all, can somebody help me? What does it mean the parameter "mangling method = hash"? Thanks L. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! – Get yours free!

Dear all, I have used the Samba 2.2.8a server. mangle method = hash or hash2 But when i make a "dir" command on the MS-DOS prompt, the file name aren't the same from a disk on DOS local partition and Samba Server partition. :-( File name on the Windows view: ESTE_DE_NOME_BEM_GRANDE.TXT DOS prompt on the Samba Serve Partition: TESTE~65.TXT DOS prompt on the DOS local Partition

If I only run dfs on my samba server, do I still need to worry about the mangle=hash buffer overlow and set "mangle method=hash2" on my older versions of samba? Thank-you, Greg

I want all the file-names to be stored on a samba share from my XP clients to be automatically converted to 8.3 syntax, so that i do not have any further problem while transporting those files over to other networks/servers like netware. As for now i am using these below mentioned lines to support file-name mangling over my samba. --------- #I do not want my filenames to be case sensitive,

Dear sambaphiles, I hope someone can help me understand why I see inconsistent name mangling between Samba and Windows 2000. I am running: LINUX: smbd Version 2.2.1a on linux kernel 2.4.18 MAC: Mac OS 9.1; DAVE version 2.5.2 WINDOWS 2000 PROFESSION (ServicePack 2) According to the O'Reilly book, 'Using Samba', given a file named: antidisestablishmentarianism.txt According to

After "image" and "persp" would it be interesting to als have contour as a generic function? Cheers Paulo Justiniano Ribeiro Jr Dept Maths & Stats - Fylde College Lancaster University Lancaster LA1 4YF - U.K. e-mail: Paulo.Ribeiro@est.ufpr.br http://www.maths.lancs.ac.uk/~ribeiro -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

When setting permission on a file or folder through Windows XP on a Samba share, I am not able to add additional Active Directory user ID's or groups to the ACL permissions. When I attempt to apply the setting I get a message "Unable to save permission changes on xxxx.file, access denied". I am receiving error "Too many ACE entries for file New Text Document.txt to convert to

Hello all, I am exporting my linux home directory to my XP machine using samba-3.0.24-4.fc5. Some of the files in my mp3 subdirectory are showing up mangled. When I try to set mangled names = no on my share, then the files stop being mangled, but the files that were mangled before are no longer accessible. The mangling is inconvenient because what will often happen is that one or two of the

Hi, I'm trying to set up msdfs on FreeBSD 4.10 with samba 3.08. The clients I use are WinXp (sp1) and the desktop browser on RedHat ES3. Problems described beneath are identical for both clients. I tried to follow the howto as precisely as possible to not into problems, however, I did... In /export/dfsroot I made a link msdfs:strsvr01\part0 . I made sure everything is in lower case.

Hi all, According to the SPIR 2.0 spec[1], the name of OpenCL builtins are mangled. However, when I compile OpenCl code with Clang 3.9 with the "spir64-unknown-unknown" target, Clang generates IR without mangling the builtins, e.g. for: __kernel void input_zip_int(__global int *in0) { *in0 = get_global_id(0); } clang generates: define spir_kernel void @input_zip_int(i32

Hi all, I face the following problem. I have two variables x,y. I have also calculated the surface z. When I am drawing the surface with function >levelplot (in library lattice) everything is OK. I have the legend etc ... Then I am trying to plot x,y on the same graph. So I am doing : >points(x,y) But, the points are not in the correct position. They are a little bit shifted to the

There is a bug in AIC.default and AIC.lm, as illustrated below. (I've only checked this under 1.6.1, and can't easily check if it has already been reported since the site is down.) > lm1 <- lm(y ~ x, list(x=1:10, y=jitter(1:10))) > lm2 <- lm(y ~ x, list(x=1:10, y=jitter(1:10))) > AIC(lm1, lm2) df AIC lm1 3 -18.662493 lm2 3 -7.265906 > AIC(lm1, lm2, k = 2)