similar to: file_set_dosmode / No data available with 3.0.8

That was a good hint! Yes, I've installed SP2, and it realy seems to be the Problem. Now I've checked that on a machine with SP1 - and the jobs from the same printqueue are removed correctly there! -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ? (14-Dez-2004 19:13) From: novosirj@umdnj.edu To: t.pompe@architekt-prinz.at >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [!! i've Cc'ed several fs lists, please remove when when replying !!] hi all, from time to time i do some benchmarks for several filesystems and several crypto-algorithms too, details here: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/ latest results here: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz/2.6.12-rc3-mm2/bonnie.html

Hi, I upgraded from samba 3.0.7 to 3.0.8 I got a special share for an application where I need to do a force user and a force group. However since the upgrade I get an input output error in the application. here is the relevant log entry [2004/11/10 10:22:37, 2] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2setfilepathinfo(3681) file_set_dosmode of elbadata_5/elba5.db failed (Error 0) Actually the User who

--- branches/SAMBA_3_0_RELEASE/source/smbd/dosmode.c 2004/10/25 19:25:54 3220 +++ branches/SAMBA_3_0_RELEASE/source/smbd/dosmode.c 2004/11/07 20:42:45 3605 @@ -344,7 +344,9 @@ return(-1); } - get_acl_group_bits(conn, fname, &st->st_mode); + if (!get_acl_group_bits(conn, fname, &st->st_mode)) { + return(-1); + } if (S_ISDIR(st->st_mode)) dosmode |= aDIR; This

hi, i've made *some* benchmarks, i plan to do more. benchmarks requests welcome, e.g. "please test this...with that.." https://ephigenie.kicks-ass.net/bench/benchmark.html but only in https://ephigenie.kicks-ass.net/bench/prinz are results right now. I hope this is helpful. Thanks, Christian.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [cc'ing 4 mailing lists, please reply to *one* list only!] hi, i was about to set up a new fs for my desktop machine and i could not decide which fs it should be. i've written a wrapper script for some benchmarks before, but it was not really good. i tried to rewrite it and so, here are the results: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/

Hello! I'm using samba with CUPS printing (with raw passthru) for a long time now and it worked very well. But after upgrading my samba installation from 3.0.2 to 3.0.9, the printjobs (sent from XP Workstations) aren't removed from the joblist anymore. Means: the job is printed correctly, but opening the printqueue on the XP machine still contains the job (not only mine, but jobs from

I modified the CUPS access rights (defined in cupsd.conf). Before that only users of administrative group had access to the printer configuration parts. Now I removed all access restrictions, so that anyone can access all CUPS services (printers, jobs, ...) (we use this, because sometimes we need to hold printers manually ...). But, as I mentioned, I don't find the relationship between this

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 ext3-users-request@redhat.com wrote : >Send Ext3-users mailing list submissions to > ext3-users@redhat.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ext3-users-request@redhat.com > >You can reach the person

We use LDAP backend and Linux 2.6. It happens only --with-acl-support. This 2 errors I found in the level 10 log when I try to copy a fresh copied file a second time on itself (permissions of test file are -r-xrw----, user and group match) Maybe the attribute mapping goes another path with acl support? 3.0.7 works fine. Daniel [2004/11/09 17:02:02, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(1038)

Hello all, I'm trying to set up my samba server rev 3.2.3 on opensuse 10.3 as a member of the active directory domain, so that client connections can be authenticated by the AD server. Unfortunately when I try to connect to the samba server from a windows XP system, it keeps on asking me for user name and password. I've been reading through various howto's and descriptions but no

When writing to a newly created btrfs (vanilla 2.6.33-rc6, sparc64) the following messages are printed: [28617.650231] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28617.745783] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.589492] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.685036] Kernel

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

Let me preface this by saying "Yes, I know *nix filesystems don't need to worry about fragmentation". That said, is there a way to check the overall level of fragmentation of a live ext3 filesystem? I know about filefrag, but that's for specific files. And I think e2fsck tells you, but only if you take the filesystem offline for the scan. Is there anything that will give

We have a problem with an application that clears the archive bit before writing and sets it after writing. The latter one doesn't succeed if the writer != file owner. Dos filemode is enabled and manually setting is fine. Samba is 3.0.23RC3. Client is XP/SP2. Seems to loose the connection before setting the bit and a new smbd is spawn. Daniel [2006/07/05 09:32:36, 10]

Apologies for the wide alias, but as it may interest serveral fs groups, here it is: In the everlasting search for the best fs for my shiny new disks, I was interested in some numbers, here're the results: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/amd64/2.6.19-rc5-git4/test-3/dm-crypt-3.html details: http://nerdbynature.de/wp/?cat=4 (in short: ext3 pretty fast in all operations. then again, the numbers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 [cc'ing 4 mailing lists, please reply to *one* list only!] hi, every now and then i'm running some benchmarks on filesystems i really use...here are the results: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz64/2.6.14-rc2-mm2/bonnie.html http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz64/2.6.14-rc2-mm2/ may it be of some help.... thanks, Christian. PS:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2093 Bug ID: 2093 Summary: don't forward authentication for the whole keyring Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1585 --- Comment #8 from mindrot at nerdbynature.de --- Created attachment 2274 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2274&action=edit Include option patch for OpenSSH 6.2 This is really just a modified version of Gavin Beatty's patch, slightly altered so it'll apply cleanly to OpenSSH 6.2 (i.e. yesterdays CVS checkout).