similar to: insconsistent server behavior

Hello everybody. We had a Samba 3.024 on a old computer. It's disks begun to fail and we decided to replace the computer with a new one. I installed a Lenny and a Samba 3.2.5. I've two problems of slowness : * If I open a large pdf ( around 5 Mbytes ) on any computer and if I want to print it ( directly from the computer to the printer, we do not use Samba as a print server )

I have a file_column that points to a pdf. I want that pdf to open in a new window, thus wrote the code: <%= link_to(''PDF version'', url_for_file_column(''floor_plan'', ''pdf_file''), :popup => true) %> which generates the code: <a href="/floor_plan/pdf_file/12/first_floor.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return

Has anyone received this message while attempting to do a MAKE INSTALL on ZAPTEL depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.26-gentoo-r9/misc/ztdummy.o I am not running DEVFS so that's not the issue. Zaptel drivers/modules all load, but ztdummy won't /lib/modules/2.4.26-gentoo-r9/misc/ztdummy.o: /lib/modules/2.4.26-gentoo-r9/misc/ztdummy.o: unresolved

Hello - any help is greatly appreciated. I am trying to compile zaptel on debian 2.4.26-1-386. I have a single X100P card installed. When I run '/usr/src/zaptel/make clean;make install' I get the following: depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/misc/torisa.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/misc/zaptel.o /sbin/depmod -a depmod: ***

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.23 Followup-For: Bug #254681 Please generalize "nobody" to "[_[:alnum:]-]+", as some cron jobs su to other users: Jul 11 06:51:16 tux su[10385]: + ??? root:hinfo Jul 11 06:57:25 tux su[29801]: + ??? root:www-data Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500,

Hi! When I try to load the ztdummy driver via "insmod ztdummy", I get the following errors: /lib/modules/2.4.26/misc/ztdummy.o: unresolved symbol zt_unregister /lib/modules/2.4.26/misc/ztdummy.o: unresolved symbol zt_transmit /lib/modules/2.4.26/misc/ztdummy.o: unresolved symbol zt_receive /lib/modules/2.4.26/misc/ztdummy.o: unresolved symbol zt_register I'm using zaptel-1.0.8 and

Hello, I contacted Krzysztof Halasa, the maintainer of the current sethdlc code. This is the response he gave me. Of course, I have this working now. Still some minor configuration to do, but It does work, and the connections to the internet are _much_ faster than when I went through the adtran... I would highly recommend to anyone with a fractionated T1, with data and voice channels to

... is on SourceForge: http://tcng.sourceforge.net/dist/tcng-9m.tar.gz md5sum 636d382f6db917b385e7a6f158136ca2 See also http://tcng.sourceforge.net/ This release contains the upgrade to 2.4.26, plus a few compatibility changes. There''s also a major bug that strangely went undetected until recently, when Laurent Moutel reported that his classifiers behaved unexpectedly: if testing

I have Wildcard TDM400P - so after compile i'm loading zapatel and wcfxs - kernel modules. My question is does I need other module in order to work with the FXO and FXS. ( beacause in other document i've noticed that there was writen to load and wcfxo - module ) but when i try this I get an error. voipgw:~# modprobe wcfxo /lib/modules/2.4.26/misc/wcfxo.o: init_module: No such

Hi, I've seen some reports about ruuning Intel modem with 537 or MD3200 chipset running with Zaptel drivers as a FXO port. Did anybody managed to set up a PCI faxmodem based on Intel536ep chipset to work with * and Zaptel drivers? Modem seemd to work just fine with Linux, but the driver says no;) some more info: Linux 2.4.26 mazuchna:~# cat /proc/pci | grep 536 Communication

Hello! I discovered, that I'm unable to load ther kernel module under 2.4.28. Before that I had 2.4.26 and tryed to upgrade the kernel to 2.4.28. After restart (reboot - soft restart) I can't load the module. When I go back to 2.4.26 and try to load the module, I'm getting the same problem. Only turning off/on helps. What can I do? It's very annoying because the box is in hosting

I found similar posts regarding this error but none that answered my question. My zaptel.conf reads: fxsks=1-2 fxoks=3 loadzone=us defaultzone=us and /proc/interrupts: CPU0 0: 5542402 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 2 IO-APIC-edge keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 8: 3 IO-APIC-edge rtc 14: 72582 IO-APIC-edge

Hi Guys, I''m trying to compile IMQ with kernel-2.4.26 and iptables-1.2.9 and I want to know is this procedure is correct: ---------------------------------------- - In Kernel 2.4.26 Directory (/usr/src/linux) # cd /usr/src/linux # wget http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.4.24-imq.diff # patch -p1 < linux-2.4.24-imq.diff - In Patch O Matic Directory

hi i am running Debian/GNU Linux with 2.4.26 kernel and radius server my kernel conf looks like this <*> Packet socket [ ] Packet socket: mmapped IO < > Netlink device emulation [*] Network packet filtering (replaces ipchains) [*] Network packet filtering debugging [ ] Socket Filtering <*> Unix domain sockets [*] TCP/IP networking [*] IP: multicasting [*] IP: advanced

Hi, I am using linux-2.4.26-9 kernel. I have patched the kernel with julians routes-2.4.26-9.diff patch. As per the nano.txt document i have configured my box with multiple internet links. When any of the gateway goes down, the dead gateway detection is not happening and all the route is not given to the avaliable link (another live link) . Can any one give me the solution for this

Hello, I''ve discoverd hfsc few days ago, and for me it''s great ! I''am running it on linux 2.4.26 with vlan interfaces using iANS. During tests I''ve discovered few problems. My set of rules is quite big: root@hades:/home/system/scr/etc/hfsc_rebuild# cat tc.batch | grep hfsc | wc -l 27900 and alwyas when I delete the root hfsc class, machine is loosing network

Hi, All: I am tring to use STP function on bridge device that refer the BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO. And I use PING program to test it from PC1 to PC2. But the forward function is become too long when bridge topology change. How can I tuning the STP to make client connect to another again faster? I have been use follow command. But it seen not this issue. Bcause, if I run " arp -d " on

Hi, I followed the instructions on http://www.asterisk.org/index.php?menu=download. I picked the latest version using CVS. Things went fine until I cd zaptel ; make clean ; make install. I then get an error when compiling zaptel.c /usr/src/linux/include/linux/kernel.h:75: error: parse error before "size_t" This happens very early on and I suspect that it is actually an issue with the

Hi All, For my issue, first thanks to ALL, I have some idea of it. Also Thank Peter for his kind remind, I would become one good guy in this list. Most mentioned MTU, but how I assure that the problem is just MTU, how I debug it? Here is my bridge configuration: Internet | | Gateway | | eth0 Ethernet Bridge | eth1 | H u b ( one normal hub

I've compiled Asterisk on Redhat 9 and Fedora Core 1 in the past, generally without any problems. Especially w/ the stock kernel, which I generally loathe. When I tried to upgrade my Redhat 9 Server to the 2.4.27 kernel, doing a manual/clean compile, I had massive quality issues. I was forced to go back down to a stock 2.4.24 kernel. Never figured out why. Now, I've installed Gentoo