similar to: *.tdb permissions

I'm running 2.11, and I've noticed a number of log entries that look like so: angie.log: tdb(/usr/local/samba/var/locks/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) [2004/10/03 15:14:36, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531) tdb(/usr/local/samba/var/locks/brlock.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) The files in question look like this:

Hi, I'm hunting a bug in 3.0.x (tested on 3.0.10 and 3.0.20). Users can create and modfy files, but cannot delete them. The logs show [2005/09/21 20:48:14, 0, pid=18388, effective(4019, 412), real(4019, 0)] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767) tdb(/srv/physik.fu-berlin.de/data/.samba/cluster1-test/cache/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) [2005/09/21 20:48:15, 0,

When I start winbindd (Samba v2.2.3a on Linux), I get the entries in log.winbindd shown below. What's the story on all those complaints about file "unexpected.tdb"? There is no general problem with Samba writing to that subdirectory: # ll /var/lock/samba/ total 288 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 696 Feb 12 22:01 brlock.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 231 Feb 13

Hi I my smbd.log, I can find these lines. How to resolv this problem ? [2004/01/08 12:03:11, 5] lib/gencache.c:gencache_init(59) Opening cache file at /var/cache/samba/gencache.tdb [2004/01/08 12:03:11, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(724) tdb(unnamed): tdb_brlock failed (fd=12) at offset 4 rw_type=1 lck_type=13: Ressource temporairement non disponible [2004/01/08 12:03:11, 5]

I've run into a problem with samba and tdb reporting "too many connections" If I do a typical configure: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba \ --localstatedir=/var/samba \ --with-lockdir=/var/samba/locks \ --with-configdir=/usr/local/samba/etc I see errors like the following in /var/samba/log.smbd: [2001/11/10 22:58:53, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(342)

Hello, I am using Red-hat Linux Application Server 3.0. I have installed and successfully configured samba server & thus able to connect from windows m/c....It works perfectly fine. But when I install our product( Its a java application and one kernel loadable module) on the same machine The samba server does not restart. Following are the messages in /var/log/samba/smbd.log. after

Hello. In our samba configuration, the lock directory is located on an NFS mount. It seems that for some reason this causes many problems: Some applications fail to save files properly (eg matlab), some applications fail to print (eg acrobat reader), and each time those application fail, we got a message on the log saying [2004/02/16 10:19:35, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(724)

I cannot mount my Samba shares. I could, then I rebooted my device, and now I no longer can. The .conf file has not been changed in over a year. Here is the output of the log file: -bash-2.05b$ cat log.192.168.1.147 [2011/08/23 00:41:10, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_log(662) tdb(/opt/local/var/locks/sessionid.tdb): expand_file to 20480 failed (No space left on device) [2011/08/23 00:41:10, 1]

Please, What's this? Please, please, how to resolve ? [root@neosaldina-lj003 samba]# more nmbd.log tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/cache/samba/unexpected.tdb (835,457947) is alr eady open in this process [2005/08/04 00:12:51, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/cache/samba/unexpected.tdb (835,457947) is alr eady open in this process [2005/08/04

Hi all,. I'm getting this:- [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1274) fcntl_lock 6 34 0 1 2 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1314) fcntl_lock: Lock call successful [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:(475) tdb((NULL)): tdb_brlock failed (fd=7) at offset 4 rw_type=2 lck_type=6 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] smbd/connection.c:(156) claiming 0 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 0]

Some times I have in log : [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] lib/gencache.c:gencache_init(59) Opening cache file at /var/lock/samba/gencache.tdb [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(724) tdb(unnamed): tdb_brlock failed (fd=12) at offset 4 rw_type=1 lck_type=13: Ressource temporairement non disponible [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] libsmb/namecache.c:namecache_enable(58) namecache_enable:

[CC to Debian package maintainer] Hi there, I'm still experiencing this worrysome tdb corruption even after I upgraded to 2.2.5. I built this package myself from the officially released 2.2.5 source. Here's a log snippet: Aug 3 11:15:04 Server smbd[23307]: [2002/08/03 11:15:04, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(492) Aug 3 11:15:04 Server smbd[23307]: tdb(/var/run/samba/connections.tdb):

Hello, In regards to this thread: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-September/111158.html I might be seeing a similar compatibility with this call is on Virtuozzo based system. > cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike) > uname -a Linux hostname 2.6.8-022stab078.9-enterprise #1 SMP Thu Jun 8 12:38:51 MSD 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux > mount /dev/vzfs on /

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I was running a netbench performance test against Samba 3.0.11, and the test has not been able to complete fully. The samba logs contain lines such as this: [2005/02/28 11:35:23, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(645) ~ slave16 (192.168.133.116) connect to service netbench initially as user BENCHLAB+slave16 (uid=10016, gid=10001) (pid

Hi there, isn't there really anybody who can give hints about this problem? Thanks, Ralf ==================BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE================== >From: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@RWTH-Aachen.DE> >To: "samba@lists.samba.org" <samba@lists.samba.org> >Cc: "Eloy A. Paris" <peloy@debian.org> >Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2002 12:19:24 +0200

RHEL 5.1, dovecot 1.0.rc15 on a x86 system. dovecot -n says [root at dg mail]# dovecot -n # /etc/dovecot.conf protocols: pop3 pop3s login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable: /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login login_process_size: 64 first_valid_uid: 100 mail_executable: /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3 mail_plugin_dir: /usr/lib64/dovecot/pop3 auth default: passdb: driver: pam userdb:

We've just gone live with a file & print server, and are having major problems with Samba. When used out of hours, with all PCs switched on and connected to the domain, everything works fine. However, during the day, we have problems where users can't print to any samba-hosted printer, Access database applications (where the database is held on the server) won't work, or work

Hello, last friday I switched my users from an old server running 2.2.12 to a new one running 3.0.10 (that I've been testing myself and with smbtorture). After a while I had to switch back to the old server because some users were having serious problems. This is one of the logs (the others are very similar): [2005/03/04 12:25:05, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)

High I'm using samba in my private network since 1 year. Since yesterday I fi nd the mesg in the appendix when I trie to print. File transfer works fine, you find all printers but its not possible to print anything. Where to search ? Thanks a lot Bernd -------------- next part -------------- [1995/12/08 12:52:10, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(342) tdb(/var/lib/samba/printing.tdb):

Hi, I'm seeing this in log.winbind [2004/07/16 13:26:57, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725) tdb(/var/lib/samba/winbindd_idmap.tdb): rec_free_read bad magic 0x42424242 at offset=25528 [2004/07/16 13:26:57, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_fill_pwent(50) error getting user id for sid S-1-5-21-2216088991-3827457959-3939315012-1283 [2004/07/16 13:26:57, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)