similar to: [PATCH] smbfs: smbfs do not honor uid, gid, file_mode and dir_mode supplied by user mount

Hi there. I'm using samba3x-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2 on CentOS release 5.7 x86_64 to mount a Terastation filesystem. The "file_mode" and "dir_mode" options to mount.cifs seem to be ignored; I systematically get a "drwxrwxrwx" permission, no matter what values I provide for these options: # mount.cifs //terastation/Backup /bkp/BackupPC/ -o

> From: Gamal Abdel-Azim [mailto:gamal at crinet.com] > > While trying to expand the memory/object size in R, I noticed > that R might be using > only heap memory. Is this true? Are all objects in R created > in the heap not > allocated? It's not logical that this is the case!! Otherwise > the whole R project would > be a total waste of time and resources.

Hello, when i compiled latest linux 2.6.4 kernel source with gcc 3.3.2 on Linux/x86, i got a few warnings about varaibles beeing compared against constants where the range of the variable is so that the expression is always constant. The explicit comparison has to do with the code for high-uid and gid sheme. attached you will find a diff which does eliminate this error message by introducing an

I'm getting only partial iso8859-1 translation from an smbfs mount from my Win98SE machine. The smbfs mounted file system shows most lower-case accented characters fine; but, it substitutes underscores for most of the upper-case accented characters (and a few lower-case ones too): # uname -a Linux elm 2.4.18-8.1mdkian3 #7 Sat Aug 17 15:19:44 EDT 2002 i686 unknown (Mandrake 8.2 Linux with all

Hi I don't know where the announcements go. I cloned https://git.centos.org/git/rpms/kernel.git and grabbed the changelog section pasted below from the git diff in SPECS/kernel.spec (commit dated 4 Feb 2020) Regards +* Thu Dec 12 2019 Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata at hrbata.com> [3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7] +- [powerpc] powerpc/pseries: Remove confusing warning message (Gustavo Duarte) [1780148

On our CentOS 7 servers I see there is a new kernel available when doing yum update: kernel 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 kernel-devel 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 However I am not able to find any announcement at redhat.com for this kernel. The only announcement I find is this from CentOS: https://www.mail-archive.com/centos-announce at centos.org/msg11573.html However that CentOS announcement links to

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:08:25PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Tue 2015-05-26 15:39:49 -0400, Mark D. Baushke wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > The generator value of 5 does not lead to a q-ordered subgroup which > > is needed to pass tests in > > > > http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-56A/SP800-56A_Revision1_Mar08-2007.pdf > > I

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:42:20 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in > >>

Hello, I have the following in /etc/samba/smbfstab; //msserver/share /mnt/smb-share cifs file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,credentials=/etc/cifsusers/admin,rw However, when using 'mount /mnt/smb_dir' I get; mount: can't find /mnt/smb_dir in /etc/fstab or /etc/mtab Using 'mount -a' doesn't mount either. If I use "smbmount /mnt/smb_dir" I get; Could not

Hi all, I have a permissions problem with a samba share which I really can't fathom out. I'm trying to create a fully group writable share. Easy or so I thought. As you can see from my config I am trying all the options to set files group writable, however when I create a file from the client I'm always getting the mode 0644. Does anyone have a clue why? Thanks! client:

Hi, I have detected a very low performance with cp command or any write with CIFS mount (Netapp Storage), <15mb/s. Read performance is similar Local disk perofrmance is correct >100mb/s fstab entry is : //netapp/resource$/folder /mnt/test cifs username=u,password=p,domain=dom,iocharset=utf8,uid=1001,gid=1000,dir_mode=0700,file_mode=0700,auto Server is SLES 12 SP3 with latest updates

hello, Le 23/10/2019 ? 12:45, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 23/10/2019 10:51, nathalie ramat via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have an server ad? - everything seems ok >> I have a windows client and a linux client . The users must to >> connect on windows or on linux with the same home. >> >> when I join my client linux with the command net

I'm sure asterisk would make a great stand alone voice mail server. Basically I want to get rid of our voice mail system and replace it with *, but the problem is we use a cisco cluster with skinny clients. So I was thinking the way to contact a * server, would be through our 3640. But so far any attempt has failed. I am wondering if anyone has done something similar. Just want to verify the

Is it possible to remotely save an R session then terminate R? Of course the destructive task after 'then' is rather straightforward by itself. Thanks

Items in dmesg when FAT share's are accessed from web browser: CIFS VFS: bogus file nlink value 0 When accessed from FC/L (OFM (orthodox filemanager)): CIFS VFS: illegal date, month 0 day: 0 When the share is initially mounted: CIFS: Attempting to mount //hostname/E Use of the less secure dialect vers=1.0 is not recommended unless required for access to very old servers CIFS VFS: Send error

Hi, I have no issues uncompressing Linux kernel tarball on the samba share but getting Permission denied while compilation. What could cause this issue? init/calibrate.o: Permission deniedinit/calibrate.o: failedmake[1]: *** [init/calibrate.o] Error 1make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... CC fs/autofs/inode.ofs/autofs/init.o: Permission deniedfs/autofs/init.o: failedmake[2]: ***

Hello all, I have been struggling with a permission issue with Samba for over a week now. I've tried many different setup, without much success. I am using samba 3.6 on Arch Linux. The user I am testing with is a member of the group nobody. I have a share defined as it : security = share [public] path = /home/smbshare public = yes only guest = yes writable = yes printable =

Well, apparently there WAS a change on the Windows Server, which only affected new samba versions I was able to fix my issue by using this patch: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12776 Can this be officially fixed please? >-----Original Message----- >From: Lange Norbert >Sent: Dienstag, 08. August 2017 10:04 >To: samba at lists.samba.org >Subject: Smbclient cant

On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in >> windows >> >> root at fs1:/var/log# cd /data >> root at fs1:/data# mkdir -m 1777 test2 > No it doesn't, you are setting

Hi! I'm having trouble accessing Samba shares via autofs. Let me begin by saying that I can access the samba shares directly using smbclient without any trouble. For example: smbclient //Matsa/Pisi works fine. I first started out by copying a config line from an older system (redhat 7) that has in its auto.misc: (all on one line, of course) pisi