similar to: Access rights for one user only?

Hi, I'm going to implement Mach-O support in llvm-objcopy. Before working on this, I'd like to hear your thoughts how llvm-objcopy should handle Mach-O section names. By convention, Mach-O section names are denoted by "<segment name>,<section name>". However, GNU objcopy renames them in the following rule [1]: - If the section name is well-known, rename it to an

> On May 23, 2019, at 2:05 AM, James Henderson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I discussed this with Seiya off the mailing list yesterday, and this was the suggestion we came up with, on the basis that GNU objcopy has support for the renaming for GDB support, but it might be confusing to people who are new to the system, so we provide a more expected output

On 03/04/16 21:39, Achim Klausmann wrote: > Hello, > > i got some clients (WINDOWS7 and WINDOWS10) to connect to samba shares. > > OS is openSUSE 12.2; 13.1; 42.1 > Samba-Version: 3.6.7; 4.1.22; 4.2.4 > smb.conf is shown below. > > The samba setup is a workgroup setup, the W7-clients > are set up to the workgroup 'workgroup'. > No further changes are made

Hello Jeremy, I think you missed a "/" in: mount --bind /share1/DVR /medium/DVR mount --bind /share1/Audio /medium/Audio mount --bind /share2/Video /medium/Video mount --bind /share2/Backups /medium/Backups BR, Matt On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jeremy Allison via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:45:16PM -0500, Hal Vaughan via samba

Hello, i got some clients (WINDOWS7 and WINDOWS10) to connect to samba shares. OS is openSUSE 12.2; 13.1; 42.1 Samba-Version: 3.6.7; 4.1.22; 4.2.4 smb.conf is shown below. The samba setup is a workgroup setup, the W7-clients are set up to the workgroup 'workgroup'. No further changes are made to the W7-clients. samba setup: groupadd workgroup chgrp -R workgroup /srv/samba chmod -R 770

I haven?t used Samba for over a decade and, from what I remember, I don?t think this is possible. Whenever I search for "two mount points" or "multiple mount points," I get hits for "multiple users," but not for mount points. I have the following directories I want to share through Samba: /share1/DVR /share1/Audio /share2/Video /share2/Backups /share1 is on

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:45:16PM -0500, Hal Vaughan via samba wrote: > I haven?t used Samba for over a decade and, from what I remember, I don?t think this is possible. Whenever I search for "two mount points" or "multiple mount points," I get hits for "multiple users," but not for mount points. > > I have the following directories I want to share through

Hi all, I have recently installed samba-2.2.7-3.7.3.i386.rpm,samba-common-2.2.7-3.7.3.i386.rpm, samba-client-2.2.7-3.7.3.i386.rpm and samba-swat-2.2.7-3.7.3.i386.rpm. After i installed all these, I start the SMB services and i enable swat, but when i tried to access SWAT from the browser, using : http://localhost:901 or http://127.0.0.1:901 it returns with " the document contain no data.

hi list, we recently saw the following weird behaviour on samba v3.0.13 with MacOSX panther and tiger as clients --setup-- [share1] path = /data valid users = @admins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode = 770 force directory mode = 2770 [share2] path = /data/folder valid users = @noadmins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode

Good morning. I am using samba 3.0 on RedHat Linux 9.0 and Linux machine is having lot of users and groups . I am trying to solve a problem. I have created, for example, 10 shares ( each share is having different valid users and groups ) and I can access only 4 of them (I have rights to read or write only for 4 shares). Well, is it possible to hide to my browsing the 6 shares that I can not

Hello, At my work we have multiple freebsd machines running samba. Love it, things are working great. We have several windows 2000 servers that our engineers store their working drawings on. I need to create a mirror of this engineering windows 2000 machine to a freebsd machine running samba. The purpose of this is so that regular employees, welders whatever can just read the drawings on

I have a need to setup the recycle vfs object on our server. On my test server, I have all of the shares on a single drive and have put the following into each share: vfs_objects = recycle recycle:repository = [Actual Path and Partition that the share is located] recycle:directory_mode = 770 recycle:keeptree = Yes recycle:touch_mtime = Yes recycle:versions = Yes It works like a charm. All

Is the issue below addressed in 3.0.25b? (no freebsd port available yet so I'm still at 3.0.25a) I can't see anything specifically about this in the release notes. I just want to add that I've also seen this behaviour on a windows xp x64 client. It's a pretty serious problem.. so I'm also thinking I may have to revert to an earlier version if it doesn't look like a

Hello, everyone, I'm seeing some inconsistent behavior across SMB clients when configuring shares using the "msdfs proxy" parameter, and was hoping to get some advice from the community on this. My issue is that various SMB clients seem to behave differently when this parameter is pointed as a path that includes a sub-folder under the root share. So, given the following share

Hello all, Got samba with AD integration and extended ACL up and running. Here is what I am trying to do. share1 in smb.conf: [share1] comment = share1 path = /mnt/data/share1 public = no writable = yes printable = no valid users = @DOMAIN+group1 user1 and user2 are members of group1 user3 is not user1 creates

We restored to 3.0.23d after update to 3.0.25a because of strange dfs behavior. the detailed situation: on msdfs root server 'samba' ls -lR dfsroot/: drwxr-xr-x appl1 dfsroot/appl1 lrwxrwxrwx share1 -> msdfs:server1\share1 [dfs] comment = "SaMBa DFS root" path = /path.../dfsroot # next line does not work prior 3.0.25 !!! # hide unreadable = Yes

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 01:28:55PM -0500, Nick Couchman via samba wrote: >Hello, everyone, >I'm seeing some inconsistent behavior across SMB clients when >configuring shares using the "msdfs proxy" parameter, and was hoping >to get some advice from the community on this. My issue is that >various SMB clients seem to behave differently when this parameter is >pointed

Hello, I have a problem when uploading file to samba server when the share's volume is under lvm snapshot. I always got "The specified network name is no longer available", this happens when uploading large files like 500MB and the volume has a lvm snapshot(even 1 snapshot). If there are no snapshots, everything is ok, I can transfer large files without problem. my client is

Hi guys, I haven't seen any replies to this, but im seeing the exact same thing with Fedora 7 samba (with all the currently available patches). using winbind into a an ADS realm. My samba is 3.0.25b. Clients are XP, 2003 r2 SE and EE 32bit, 2003 r2 SE 64 bit. All work ok for a while, then suddenly start doing the same as below. I.e., when mapped it looks fine, then some time in the future

List, I'm having trouble accessing shares, and I'm getting conflicting indications on whether I've successfully joined the domain with my PC and Samba server (which may bear on the share problem). I really could use some help; I've not been able to recognize anything in the docs or via Google that helps. I'm running SUSE 9.3 and Samba 3.0.21a, and I'm trying to