similar to: (no subject)

Im intending use Ext3 file system in my web farm. Im using RedHat 6.2 (kernel 2.2.16-3) and Turbo Linux Cluster Server 6.0. I have NO SUCCESS in path my own kernel. I downloaded the following ext3 packages: ext3-0.0.2f.tar.gz (linux-2.2.16-3.kdb.diff , linux-2.2.16-3.ext3.diff ) e2fsprogs-1.20-0.WIP.i386.rpm e2fsprogs-1.20-0.WIP.src.rpm e2fsprogs-1.20-0ext3.i386.rpm

Unrelated to previous email: every time I send an email to this list I get a response such as: Hey Robin Lovelace > > Thanks for your response. Can I have a pic or two to start talking? Please > respond with pics/infos, Hope to hear back from you asap. > I wonder if others have received such emails and, if so, any suggestions how to tackle the spam? Robin [[alternative HTML

Hi, I''m a long ext3 user (rpmfind.net). I propagated ext3 on some of our server box (W3C webservers are ext3 based too now). I might be tempted of testing out your kernel RPMs but unavailability or the source RPM and the SMP version are definite showstoppers. Please provide them. In the meantime I will stick to my own set of kernel ext3 RPMs at ftp://rpmfind.net/pub/veillard/ext3/

hi everyone, i installed the ext3 fs on a test machine and tried to use quota on the ext3 filesystem. When i use the command quotaon /dev/hdb2 (the partition with the ext3 fs) i get the message: quotaon: using /home/quota.user on /dev/hdb2: Invalid argument. I created the quota.user and quota.group files and set the permissions to 600. I use quota-2.oopre3-7a, e2fsprogs-1.20-0ext3, kernel 2.2.18

Hi, I just found out, I deleted an important file, which was (of course) just downloaded to the computer from the digital camera, and deleted there. So, no backups. But when I tried to find the deleted INODE with debugfs and lsdel It said "no files deleted". Is this the normal behaviour? Is there a possibility of getting the data back? The kernel I use is 2.2.17-6 from the RH

On 28 March 2020 at 14:04, Robin Lovelace wrote: | To the list this time... | | On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:03 PM Robin Lovelace <rob00x at gmail.com> wrote: | | > Hi Dirk, | > | > Thanks for the quick response. | > | > I've updated the draft post following your suggestions, see the updated | > version, in nice .md format, here: | >

On 3/28/20 10:04 AM, Robin Lovelace wrote: > To the list this time... > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:03 PM Robin Lovelace <rob00x at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Dirk, >> >> Thanks for the quick response. >> >> I've updated the draft post following your suggestions, see the updated >> version, in nice .md format, here: >>

On 20 May 2018 at 09:34, Robin Lovelace wrote: | Thanks for keeping us updated. Before I jump the gun and put this out on | social media (as a follow-up to this tweet | https://twitter.com/robinlovelace/status/990682038373158912 ), would you | say this is a reasonable message to send to the R-using Ubuntu community?: Why don't we just wait until Michael feels he has something to announce?

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: New kernel 2.4 packages are available Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:129-10 Issue date: 2001-10-09 Updated on: 2001-10-19 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: ptrace local root kernel Cross references: Obsoletes:

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: New kernel 2.4 packages are available Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:129-05 Issue date: 2001-10-09 Updated on: 2001-10-18 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: ptrace local root kernel Cross references: Obsoletes:

Hey Stephen or Ted, Since ext3 is incorporated in linux-2.4.15-pre3 do you think we should update the Documentation/Changes since so many people had troubles with e2fsprog-2.1.19 and ext3 ? I couldn't see any RPM's after 2.1.19 so I removed RPM from the Changes file. Albert --- linux/Documentation/Changes.orig Sun Nov 11 22:17:34 2001 +++ linux/Documentation/Changes Sun Nov 11 22:21:07

Many thanks Dirk, kind-of makes sense and I think my 'hold your horses' attitude is probably safest for now. Two follow-up questions: - Roughly how long will it be until "everything has been rebuilt"? - Could this seemingly new project help manage external deps: https://github.com/r-hub/sysreqsdb ? On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at

On 3 May 2018 at 13:21, Jeroen Ooms wrote: | On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Robin Lovelace <rob00x at gmail.com> wrote: | > I'd be interested to hear views on how and when Ubuntu users should upgrade | > to R 3.5.0. | > I made the upgrade a few days ago but reverted because of issues installing | > packages such as rJava, which I installed on the system with r-cran-rjava. |

For my procmail ruleset... Dale -- /^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^V^^\ Dale Lovelace Red Hat, Inc. dale@redhat.com This week only, all our fiber-fill jackets are marked down!

One of my servers appears to have some filesystem corruption. I'm running Red Hat 6.2 with kernel 2.2.19pre6 and ext3 0.5e. That server currently has e2fsprogs-1.20-WIP-0117 installed. Is it OK to upgrade to the latest e2fsprogs (i.e.: 1.22) prior to running the e2fsck on the filesystem? --Shawn

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ______________________________________________________________________________ Caldera International, Inc. Security Advisory Subject: Linux - syncookies firewall breaking problem Advisory number: CSSA-2001-038.0 Issue date: 2001, November 05 Cross reference: ______________________________________________________________________________ 1.

On 13 June 2018 at 20:54, Robin Lovelace wrote: | I have recently re-installed R on my Ubuntu system to get R 3.5 and found | this to have worked: | | # you may need to remove incumbent repos e.g. with: | sudo apt-add-repository --remove ppa:marutter/rrutter | | # add new repos | sudo apt-add-repository ppa:marutter/rrutter3.5 # for base R | sudo apt-add-repository ppa:marutter/c2d4u4.5 # for

Hi all, ext3-0.0.7a is now out, at the usual places: ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/ and propagating now from ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/ This fixes one major bug in ext3 recovery for metadata-only journaling. Because recovery can also happen in e2fsck, users should also upgrade to at least e2fsprogs-1.21-WIP-0601 (also provided at the above ftp sites).

Hi, ext3-0.0.5d.tar.gz is now up on ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/ and ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/ as patches against 2.2.18. This only contains the kernel bits: we're in the process of syncing up on some e2fsprogs so I'll do another release shortly once we've got all of the pending changes for the user-mode tools assembled. This release is mostly

got the following in the freshmeat newsletter. the page doesn't say anything about it. also the sct dir on kernel.org still shows the WIP version... [007] - e2fsprogs 1.20 (Default)   by P. Adami (http://freshmeat.net/users/ramirez/)   Monday, May 28th 2001 19:39 The ext2fsprogs package contains essential ext2 filesystem utilities which consists of e2fsck, mke2fs, debugfs, dumpe2fs, tune2fs,