similar to: version 3.05 users %u change?

Hi, I am trying to upgrade from old samba to new one, I replaced the samba.schema for open-ldap, changed the smb.conf file to: passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap//localhost added ldap amin dn and suffix options but it still aint working with the old ldap records? Do I have to dump the old records and update them with some changes to the ldap with new schema or is samba3 ldap backward compatible?

Hello! I use Windows XP SP2 on my clients. I use the http://unattended.sf.net to automatically install my WinXP machines from a MS-DOS client. This works fine in samba-3.0.5 but since SP2 causes a problem with printers I upgraded to samba-3.0.6rc2. RC2 in turn doesn't work with MS-DOS clients. The symptom is that I can boot from the fileserver but when I try to invoke a program I get

Hi: I want to upgrade a Fedora Core 1 Linux machine that is running Samba 3.0.2a to 3.0.5. Initially, I compiled the 3.0.2a source, with defaults, and installed. The installation resides in /usr/local/samba. Can I download the 3.0.5 source, compile and install without breaking anything? Will the configuration be broken? Does anyone know a way to do this cleanly? Anyone's help is

Hi, In our dev/int environemnts, our user base wants to be able to change managed files at will during the day but be notified via email of changes that happen. At night they want the files replaced to their known good state if there were changed. I tried to do this with a custom function that wraps two file types, one that just watches checksum, the other that does a reset of content with a

I have this problem with Samba: "create_workgroup: workgroup name PRAISENET is too long. Truncating to PRAISENET 2004/08/10 21:47:08, 0] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:create_workgroup(68)" There are many lines like this in my logs, for every workgroup when its master browser is a Samba 3. Moreover there are duplicate domains (for the same domain) on the network Workgroup

Good afternoon. I have installed the 3.0.6rc2 version of samba and have found the users can't change their password. Cheers, Rafael Paris Gerente de Sistemas Casino e-mail: rparis@hotelmaruma.com pagina web/page: www.hotelmaruma.com Telefono/Phone: 0058 261 730 27 70 Fax: 0058 261 730 28 10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Summary: Potential Buffer Overruns in Samba 3.0 and Samba 2.2 CVE ID: CAN-2004-0600, CAN-2004-0686 ~ (http://cve.mitre.org/) - ------------- CAN-2004-0600 - ------------- Affected Versions: >= v3.0.2 The internal routine used by the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT v3.0.2 and later) to decode the base64 data

I've looked through the archives and the only information I can find regarding Windows XP SP2 is RC2. Has anyone out there had ANY experience with XP SP2 Official and a Samba 3 domain? -- Bert Rapp North Trail RV Center p 239.693.8200 f 239.693.8115

I have been beating my head on this since the release of 3.0.4, or some time in May. I have 2 domains. 1 production, 1 test. My production domain is useing LDAP backend and has (too)many windows clients joined, XP , 2k , "98". And 2 other linux servers joined. One of these linux boxes I have replicated with my problematic box. The only thing diffrent about the replicated box is that its

Hi, I'm having problems creating hard links on a samba share from a samba client. My environment is as follows: - PDC on a Windows NT - samba-3.0.5 client - samba-3.0.5 server (homes) I use winbindd to authenticate and it is working fine, I can create, remove and change files without any problems. The mount command line I'm using is: mount -t smbfs //10.101.0.231/homes /mnt -o

Hello Everyone, I've got Samba 3.0.4 running under Solaris 8 with ADS support... Doing the authentication on the ADS server works, access to the defines shares work... What doesn't work is my username mapping. My Unix usernames are in the form of gaudej and our AD names are in the form of joseph.gaude. My username.map file has gaudej = joseph.gaude and when I have the [home] share loaded

I'm running debian testing, so samba 3.05 atm. As of a few upgrades ago, which i think coincided with a library restructure or somewhat samba is no longer honouring read/write/admin lists on share definitions. Using the below share as an example, previously all users could access the share with read access, and those in the ntadmins group had write access. Since the upgrade users can only

Petr Vandrovec wrote: > Hello, > one of FreeDOS developers pointed out (in > http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=11324&messageID=109507&#109507) > that FreeDOS does not work under VMware when using ISOLINUX 3.0x. After > looking at their ISO image I downloaded syslinux-3.05, and there seems > to be bad bug: > > You have this in kernel.inc:

I'm trying to connect a Windows 2000 workstation to my samba pdc domain. I have followed all the steps in the documentation to setup samba as a pdc, but I have not been able to connect any workstations to the domain. Does anyone have a example smb.conf file I can compare with mine. I checked the "log.smbd" and I'm getting the following messages when I tried to add a computer

Hi, I'm trying to install Fedora Core 3 on an AMD 64-based machine using PXE (via DHCP and TFTP). I've managed to get the machine to load the kernel over the network and start booting, but instead of loading the root fs from initrd.img (that I appended as a config via pxelinux.cfg), it loads the pre-existing rootfs on my harddisk. At the top of dmesg is the message: "so old

I decided the FAT directory-parsing bug was about as serious as it gets, so I decided to push out a new release. However, I decided I feel comfortable enough with the new features (or at least, that they wouldn't break anything else, knock on wood) that I did the patch off the 3.10 development tree and called it 3.05. Changes in 3.05: * New API function "shuffle and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the second release candidate snapshot of the Samba 3.0.6 code base (the first rc was labeled as 3.0.5rc1) and should be considered for testing only. A release candidate (RC) means that we are close to the final, stable release and in provided for Quality Assurance (QA) purposes. This release is *not* intended for production servers. Use at

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the second release candidate snapshot of the Samba 3.0.6 code base (the first rc was labeled as 3.0.5rc1) and should be considered for testing only. A release candidate (RC) means that we are close to the final, stable release and in provided for Quality Assurance (QA) purposes. This release is *not* intended for production servers. Use at

Hi, I had a compilation error of the "passdb/pdb_ldap.c" file with samba-3.0.5. I did not found the source of the problem. But samba-3.0.6rc2 compiles fine. So if someone had the same problem than me, try the 3.0.6rc2 version of samba. It worked for me. ++ Marc ------------------------------------------ Subject: [Samba] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2651 compilation error !!! From:

After updating to samba-3.0.3-5, I began seeing problems with our NT4 Terminal Server. We are unable to copy or access large (200MB) files on the server. The file is an access file, but this doesn't seem to matter, I can't do a "copy bigfile.mdb \\cxhs\sys" Small files don't seem to be a problem. I've tried upgrading to samba-3.0.6rc2-2, no joy We replaced nic,