similar to: Re: FW: SAMBA+ACL+XFS

Is this because ldap is more stable? Or just wirks better? /niklo -----Original Message----- From: John H Terpstra [mailto:jht@samba.org] Sent: den 9 september 2004 20:48 To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] SAMBA with mysql backend... On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:53, Niklas L?vgren wrote: > Hi > I'm planning to use SAMBA as a replacement for NT4 PDC/BDCs. Many >

hi, may i ask some stupid question. :) I am using Samba 2.2.8a, how should i do if i don't want upgrade to the = latest version of Samba but use the *.patch file? And there are so many patch files, should i patch every file to my = system? If the affected release of a patch file is "3.0.x <=3D 3.0.6", dose it = mean this security issue just affect version 3.0.x and my system

Jorn, Your reminder is appreciated. You are completely correct. We will review and fix the documentation. Thank you. - John T. On Monday 20 September 2004 02:51, J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote: > hello jerry, hello john! > > > i believe there is a slight mistake in the documentation. i sent this to > you a while ago, but i have neither heard back from you nor is the error > fixed

Hi! We use Tapeware to back up a combination of LINUX and MS servers across the network to one of two media servers. One is Windows based and the other is LINUX. Having a little problem with the old tape autoloader on the LINUX box, but the backup/restore from the MS platform works very well. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Gapinski [mailto:dangapinski@qsi-r2.com] Sent: Monday,

Dear List, First forgive me for my RTFM question yesterday about groups not appearing in the Windows usermanager (Karel Kulhav?, thanks for your reply). I did read the SAMBA HOWTO Collection but in a more 'vertical' way. This net groupmap thing must have passed my attention. I installed a prebuild version of Samba for redhat 8.0. Redhat however does not compile in ACL's in their

OK, I have RTFM. All the I could find. I cannot seem to set permissions via WINXP Pro explorer. No matter what I do all I get is access denied - even if I own the file. Samba log reveals: [2005/04/20 10:56:08, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(326) larry opened file xghost.bin read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) [2005/04/20 10:56:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1102) Transaction 19 of length 188

Hello! I'm running samba 3.2.3 on my Ubuntu 8.10 server installation. I'm trying to use ACL in order to get extended user permission administration, but cannot make it work. My samba shares are on a ext3 partition, and i have enabled ACL in fstab. setting and getting ACL permissions on my files directly works like a charm. But when my users try to access files via samba they cannot

Unfortunately I don't know how to write AC macros to properly solve this problem but Cygwin does not (any longer) include cygwin/acl.h from sys/acls.h which is required for Solaris ACL data structures to work. So the CASE statement improperly short-circuits the logic. I have confirmed that Rsync builds using POSIX ACLs but haven't tested said functionality. diff --git a/configure.ac

Using Samba+winbind 3.3.8 as a fileserver on a Win2008 domain. getent and wbinfo is reporting correct informations about users. However, my groups directories are allowing people who shouldn't .. From the shell everything is working as expected, but not from samba.. What did I miss !? Exported share: /export/users drwxr-x---+ 7 root root 4096 Mar 18 14:57 group # (teams directories)

Hi samba group, I'm trying to get samba to act like Windows in the Security tab (to be able to add, remove, and modify ACLs on certain files/folders). We are running Centos 5.2 (2.6.18-92.1.22.el5) with XFS installed for the /share partition. I currently have these versions of samba installed: samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 samba-common-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 I am pretty sure the ACL is all

Hi everybody, I have a problem with Samba 3.0.2 using POSIX ACLs for shares. File written from an ACL group/user will get wrong permissions and are unchangeable for other users. First the important informations about the configuration and the setup: a) Base system: Debian 3.0.1 with all updates b) Samba: Self compiled binary within /opt/samba-3.0.2 used the following flags:

Hi, all. I could not add any additional users to a file or directory using the Windows Security tab in Windows XP Sp2. Here is my configuration for samba-3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2. # grep ACL config-2.6.18-8.el5 CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFS_ACL_SUPPORT=m # smbd -b | grep ACL HAVE_SYS_ACL_H

Hi, On a windows client if I attempt to modify the permissions on a file which resides on a linux server, when I hit "apply or ok" my changes are lost. Doing it from the unix cli (using setfacl) works as expected and the changes are not lost. Yet on windows if I right click - properties - Security. select add, add a user or group, hit Apply and the user/group I just added is

Thanks Sir, just inquisitive, because in a similar PDC configured on NT, I can have groupnames similar to usernames. Also because this is done through a script from web I was getting problems... however now I know it shouldnt be done so I will have to validate that, but a similar validation or some error string displayed from the command itself would be usefull.. regards On Wednesday 25 May 2005

Resolved: I was not able to compile then make install and have work so I ended up using the FC3 packages and adding only the freshly compiled idmap_rid module. Thanks for the help. Brian Hoover MailLists wrote: > John, sorry I did not mean to reply directly, I hate MS-Outlook! > > John H Terpstra wrote: >> On Sunday 30 January 2005 09:17, MailLists wrote: >>> Hello,

Folks, In preparation for the release of Samba-3.0.8 I have updated the smb.conf man page as well as the Samba-HOWTO-Collection to document the use of the new idmap_rid facility. As part of the documentation update I have attempted to expand our documentation regarding the role that winbind plays in Samba configurations. This is a first cut at a chapter inserted to become the new chapter 12

I'm curious to know where the tdbsam password database file is kept on my Fedora 7 system. Using the unmodified smb.conf file that shipped with Fedora 7, I've enabled users using smbpasswd, and successfully accessed shares. I just can't figure out where the password database is located: [root@box ~]# service smb start [root@box ~]# setsebool samba_enable_home_dirs on [root@box ~]#

Folks, Given recent discussion on this list I have just updated the master Samba-Docs information regarding the Debug Class (Log Level) settings and the audit information each causes to be logged. This will appear in on-line versions of the Samba-HOWTO-Collection within 24 hours. To obtain an updated version point your browser at: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf

Hello Andrew, and many thanks for your fast reply! :-) Am 08.06.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > I think the key to avoiding the issue is that you have listed rpc > modules which are not modules. The only rpc server module is > rpc_mdssvc_module. Ah, OK, I see - so I seem to have been wrong when assuming that I could take the output of Samba 3.5.16 "smbd -b" command

Folks, Over the past few weeks the Samba-HOWTO-Collection and the Samba-Guide have been significantly updated. Over the next 48 hours I hope to complete this process. Today I have added a new chapter to the Samba-3 by Example book (the Samba-Guide). within 24 hours all mirror site should be hosting the current update. I would very much appreciate review of the new chapter 8 and the