similar to: pdbedit - RID for machine accounts

Hi, I'm a tad confused about something. I've got a production instance of Samba running. I am trying to get a test version running on the same box, with the same SID. Without the test server running, I used "net setlocalSID <oldsid>" (the net binary is the one for the new server). Then when I issued 'net getlocalsid' it returned it. I thought I was fine.

hi everybody, i would very appreciate it if somebody could give me some advice to the following problem - thank you in advance, karel. *************************************** the problem(s): - after changing pdc (hw and samba-version, see below) the domain-adminstrator user is not able to manage users in the citrix environment: the error maessage: user xxx is not prileged to ..., can not

Hello: I'm using: - samba-common-3.0.9-1 - kernel 2.6.5-1.358 - FC 2 - openldap-servers-2.1.29-1 We're running an NT4 domain using an LDAP backend, and everything was running fine until recently. The first thing that I noticed that new users were suddenly being assigned SambaSID's that were previously being assigned to machines. Previously: Typical User Entry: uid: john

Hi, my problem is the following: i am trying to replace an old SUSE 8.2, Samba 2.2 domain controller with a SUSE 9.3 system with samba 3.0 as PDC. Everything works fine, i can join the new domain, i replaced the machine and domain sid from the new server with the old ones. But how can reuse the profiles from the old machine at the new one? If i make a simple remote copy, the settings of the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 After a failed migrate from NT4 to Samba 3.0 using the rpc vampire method I decided I'd do it manually with 'net rpc samdump'. Well it sort of worked, except I can't edit any of the users settings, it might just be me, but it should modify the profile to that, just as a test but it doesn't. I'd actually like to get rid of the

Hello Samba people, My goal is to upgrade our Samba 2.2.9 PDC to 3.0.6. 2.2.9 was installed from an RPM, but 3.0.6 is compiled from source. No special options except --with-prefix and other location-specific ones. We are using the typical smbpasswd back-end. So I have compiled and installed 3.0.6. I have tweaked the smb.conf to reflect what I believe are the new values for 3.x. The

Hi I've been reading every documentation available for creating smb domain groups and users, mapping domain groups and users... still learning... Every document I read states that root should be modified to RID 500, by running ' pdbedit -U `net getlocalsid | cut -d ":" -f2 | tr -d ' '`-500 -u root -r', but I always get root to RID 1000 and its domain group RID

On my Samba PDC, using tdbpass: 'pdbedit -Lv agrotera$' produces: Unix username: agrotera$ NT username: Account Flags: [W ] User SID: S-1-5-21-4211105910-4270789338-3787013593-1414 Primary Group SID: S-1-5-21-4211105910-4270789338-3787013593-513 ..... 'getent passwd agrotera$' gives: agrotera$:x:207:200:SMB

Samba 3.0.24 on Debian Etch 4 - PDC security=user When I execute "pdbedit -L" then leaves a strange error. I stick underneath a copy here: Linux:~# pdbedit -L INFO: Current debug levels: all: True/5 tdb: False/0 printdrivers: False/0 lanman: False/0 smb: False/0 rpc_parse: False/0 rpc_srv: False/0 rpc_cli: False/0 passdb: False/0 sam: False/0 auth: False/0

Hi, I am running a couple of Samba / LDAP servers. While they all do work fine, I get a message like this on all of them when I run pdbedit -L -v: Unix username: administrator NT username: administrator Account Flags: [UX ] User SID: S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-21000 init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 512 lookup_global_sam_rid:

Samba 3.0.24 on Debian Etch 4 - PDC security=user When I execute "pdbedit -L" there are a strange error: lookup_global_sam_rid: looking up RID 513. pdb_getsampwrid (TDB): error looking up RID 513 by key RID_00000201. Error: Record does not exist store_gid_sid_cache: gid 1005 in cache -> S-1-5-21-275117359-2948478385-1723927003-513 I paste a copy of pdbedit -L, net groupmap list and

Hallo Herr Trapp, ich bin am verzweifeln. Haben Sie eine L?sung gefunden, um mittels setlocalsid die Dom?nenSID zu ?ndern? Ich weiss, es ist schon l?nger her. Ich soll einen alten SAMBA 2 durch eine neue Maschine mit SAMBA 3 ersetzen. Der Server l?uft gut, aber mit net setlocalsid, dem Kommando profiles (es ersetzt mir die USER und GRUPPEN-ID in der NTUSER.dat, aber nur im Output; physikalisch

Hi all! I'm configuring a samba PDC with an LDAP sam. Everything is working great except that when I do pdbedit -Lv root (which is my "Domain Administrator" account) I see that it's getting a Primary Group SID value of S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXX-513 instead of the S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXX-512 that is stored in my LDAP tree. Does someone

On Thu, 3 May 2018 17:35:25 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > No, you should get the same UID on the Unix domain member at all > > > times, it will just be a different on to the PDC. > > > > I get the same uid all time but not the one I expect. > > I'd expect that idmap return "UNIX_UID + LOW_RANGE_ID"

Hi, I'm new to the list, I hope i'm posting at the right place ;) I'm having a hard time trying to update and to move my Samba 2.2 PDC to a new Debian server. Currently, the PDC is using Samba 2.2.8 on a Solaris Server. My goal is to move it to another computer, and to update it to a newer version (3.0.24) This must be fully transparent for the users, since I have no time to

Hello, I have a SLES10 64bit machine running samba 3.5.12. i have configured a domain (TASC), and set the servers netbios name to TUX. Samba is using the tdbsam backend. Now I have add machines to the domain, and users can logon using their domain accounts TASC\user. However, if the network is disconnected, in the case of laptop users going offsite, they cannot logon anymore. I have now

Hi all, I have a problem that started last week with winbind on a member server. The network consists of the following: Openldap/Bind/DHCP Server (No Samba) PDC - CentOS Linux - Samba 3-3.5.6-43.el5 (sernet package) BDC - CentOS Linux - Samba 3-3.0.31-36 Proxy Server (with NTLM Auth) - Mandriva Linux - Samba 3.5.3-3.1mdv2010.1 All of these work fine but the proxy needs replacing so I've

Hello. I've still got a couple of NT domains and I'd like to upgrade them to AD. In these days I had a chance to try to migrate one of them, but I ran into troubles and had to go back. I don't know when I'll have the chance to try again (probably not before some months), but I need to understand what went wrong before that. The starting situation: Samba 4.8 running as AD

Hi, I know this issue has already been handled several times, but I couldn?t find any clear description of the procedure. I have Samba 2.2.5 running as a PDC on a RedHat 7.3 box, which I?d like to migrate to 3.0.2a now. Both versions are compiled from source using different prefixes (/usr/local/samba and /usr/local/samba3), so I can still use the old version until I get the new one working.

On 26/06/2019 15:28, Andrea Venturoli via samba wrote: > Hello. > > I've still got a couple of NT domains and I'd like to upgrade them to > AD. In these days I had a chance to try to migrate one of them, but I > ran into troubles and had to go back. I don't know when I'll have the > chance to try again (probably not before some months), but I need to >