similar to: hide unreadable

Hi all. I thying settings the option "hide unreadable" but not work. I tested in global section and share section, follow my settings now. after various tests. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = BATLAB realm = BATLAB.CORP netbios name = GAUSS server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl,

I'm not sure if this is a bug or Working As Designed. I'm hoping someone can clarify for me. Brief environment: SLES 9, SP3; samba-3.0.20b-3.4 We use Posix ACLs for a more granular control of permissions on our shares. We also use "hide unreadable = yes" for one share (we'd prefer to use it for more but we can't due to this issue). With "hide unreadable =

Hello, I'm running Samba 3.0.6 PDC with OpenLDAP 2.1.25 backend on a Linux machine with RedHat 3.0 ES installed. This is a large installation with separate Samba BDC and 2 file servers. The BDC server uses a replica LDAP server, working as slave for the master LDAP server installed at PDC. The number of domain accounts is about 1850 and at the moment about 500 machines are added to the

Hello We have a Samba 3.0.11 Fileserver running on Solaris and joined to an Active Directory. I have shares, with many directories, and I want to hide the directories, people are not allowed to access anyway. So I engaged the "hide unreadable files" option. This basically works. The Problem arises, when the user is logged on locally (not authenticated to the Domain) and mounts the

hi, on a samba domain member file server i'm using dfs root shares with multiple msdfs symlinks pointing to other shares (on the same server), which works fine. These linked shares have different access rights, therefore a user might have access to one linked share but not to another. Is there any option to hide msdfs-symlinks to shares that a user cannot read? (the same as 'hide

The "hide unreadable = yes" option gives strange results with samba 3.x. Everything works fine when the server runs as a domain controller. Users see the directories they are supposed to (unix group permission) in the share. Turning off domain control and setting "security = DOMAIN", however, hides every directory in the share unless you are an admin user. I can cd to the

Hi all! I have a problem with the "hide unreadable = yes" option. In windows xp professional sp2 with explorer, or ssh or smbclient, either directories and files does not hide. I'm using debian 4.0 with XFS file system, ACL, kernel 2.6.18-5-amd64, and samba 3.0.24. Any idea? It is a bug? Thanks! -- Diego _________________________________________________________________

On 16-04-2024 16:21, Konrad Jacobi via samba wrote: > hi, > on a samba domain member file server i'm using dfs root shares with > multiple msdfs symlinks pointing to other shares (on the same server), > which works fine. These linked shares have different access rights, > therefore a user might have access to one linked share but not to > another. > Another option is

Hello, ? i am using samba 4.1 ? i have an folder on a samba share with 3000 files, created with the following script: for i in {1..3000}; do dd if=/dev/urandom of=test$i bs=512k count=1; done ? When i save a file with word2010/2013 to this folder, everything works. But when i enable "hide unreadable=yes" on this share, File saving with word needs about 10seconds! ? The user can

Hi guys, we are using samba 3.0.4 as domain member server (security=ADS) in our Active Directory Domain. In order not to compromise social peace, we use POSIX ACLs in conjunction with the hide unreadable option to hide folders/files from users. I'll show you an example to explain the problem: I'm the user "SCHARRNET+M006U122" (SCHARRNET=domain suffix). I'm connecting to

Hello, I am using samba 3.6.6 I would like to use the option "hide unreadable = yes" but only for directories because the actual option slow down the access to directories with a large number of files and I don't need to hide these files. Is it possible and how can I do this ? And, will it improve directory access ? Thanks -- David

Hello, I'm new to this list, so please excuse, if my problem as already be solved or is "handmade". My Question: We set up Samba 2.2.5 with ACLs and everything works fine. We want to use a very flat hirarchie, so we have one share for the users and one share for the groups. To prevent our people from feeling uncomfortable, we want to hide the directories to which they don't

Hello, I did a quick change to the patched port of poppassd and am wondering if you think my code would introduce any potential problems. The idea is right after we check if the username exists, also check if the UID of that username is over 1000. I wanted to make sure that no one monkeys around with priveleged users once poppassd is running. So, the middle chunk of code is mine, everything

Hello list Sorry if this has been answered before, I have had a look around and could not find any answers. I am running samba 3.0.3pre2 on suse 9.0 - installed from suse rpms. I have managed to join the 2k3 domain and users are authenticating perfectly and all seems to be working, (users have actually remarked about a speed increase!) although i get this strange message in the log.winbindd:

Move the removal of the files which don't exist or cannot be read, doing it after the filtering with excludefiles and hostfiles files. This avoid stat'ing files which will be excluded later anyway, hence reducing the I/O during a supermin build phase. --- src/build.ml | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/build.ml

This avoids an error where the appliance cannot start up because this dbus helper script (which is never used) is unreadable by non-root. Why do we have unreadable binaries in Fedora at all? You may wonder: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-October/msg00987.html Maintaining a blacklist like this is generally a bad thing. We should change this code so it automatically

Hi, we've got a worse problem with our s.3.0.4 file server. The server is configured as a domain member server and is running in security=ADS mode. We use the hide unreadable parameter in conjunction with posix ACLs to ensure, that our users only see those folders, on which they have been authorized. With s.2.2.8a everything worked fine. Yesterday we migrated to s.3.0.4 and have now the

I figured this out -- looks like 2.5.1p1 is now using ports < 1024 on the client side (wasn't before?). I had a ipchains rule to allow ACK packets to 1024:65535, which was good enough for <= 2.3.0p1 : #allow only ACK tcp packed ipchains -A input -j ACCEPT -i eth0 -s any/0 --dport 1024:65535 -p tcp ! -y So I added the following : #allow return from ssh connections ipchains -A input -j

Playing around with examples from MASS4, I found a font problem in the mosaicplot in R-2.3.0. It doesn't happen in other plots. Running this example from MASS4, page 326... library(MASS) caith1 <- as.matrix(caith) names(dimnames(caith1)) <- c("eyes", "hair") mosaicplot(caith1, color = TRUE) ...I get an image as attached. The column and row labels are unreadable. It

Guys, This is probably known, but since I working on nut tonight, I thought I would make sure. This is with the latest built from git. The cgi-bin script that shows the graph of upsstats has text that is unreadable. The text is black and the background is black. Here is a screenshot: http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/bugs/nut/cgi-black-text.jpg Here is the same page with the text selected with