similar to: 2 terabyte filesystem limitation on linux client

Hi. Google shows that this problem has been brought up before, but I can't find the solution in the list archives. If I try to mount a samba share (v3.0.3) using cifs it returns: mount error 13 = Permission denied and in the log: May 14 11:41:31 myriapod kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -13 May 14 11:41:31 myriapod kernel: CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -13

(Is this the right place to post such question?) I can't seem to grasp the right syntax for smbcacls This is a 306rc2, security=user system w/ passwords set via smbpasswd, and smbclient gives expected r/w behavior.I've seen the same on a 302a security=domain or ads system (I believe), which is why I think I'm misinterpreting something (or is smbcacls broken??) -- or what

Looking for ext2 & ext3 expert. This problem is on a ext3 partition. I have a small file (1395 bytes) that appears HUGE when runing ls -l (70368744179059 bytes). This causes a problem because tar wants to back up all those extra bytes. [root@secure parse]# ls -l HTMLFrameSet.class -rw-rw-r-- 1 root devel 70368744179059 Mar 20 09:05 HTMLFrameSet.class [root@secure parse]# wc

hi. i'm hitting a wall each time i try to format a 3 terabyte partition. i'm able to create the partition using parted but whenever i try to create a 3 terabyte xfs or jfs or ext3 filesystem, the mounted filesystem created is only 1 terabyte. i tried centos x86 and x86_64 4.0 but i always hit a 1 terabyte limit. please help.

Has anyone experienced a significant degradation in ext3 performance when using it on a Multi-TeraByte RAID? As part of an experimental setup, I hooked up three 300GB drives and made an EXT3 RAID5 out of them, using the entire space one each drive, and started throwing a large number of files in the size-range 3KB to 50 KB. Then, I deleted the raid, and created a new one, but this time, I used

Hello everyone, I am trying to fit the following model All X. variables are continuous, while the conditions are categoricals. model <- lm(X2

Hallo, All, I have a question about changing the height or scale of the y axis. When I use following two R codes, I can get two plots. Please look at the y axes, the number of indices (x1, x2, ?) on the y axis in the first plot is smaller than that in the second plot, and hence the space between any two indices in the first plot is wider than that in the second plot. As the number of indices

Hello all: I have two machines with btrfs, that give me the "blocked for more than 120 seconds" message. After that I cannot write anything to disk, i am unable to unmount the btrfs filesystem and i can only reboot with sysrq-trigger. It always happens when i write many files with rsync over network. When i used 3.2rc6 it happened randomly on both machines after 50-500gb of writes.

I've been attempting to calculate the predictions from a poisson glm object, along these lines: predict(foo.glm, type = "response") and predict(foo.glm, type = "response", se.fit = TRUE) foo.glm is arrived at this way: foo.glm <- glm(Insects ~ Dad * Mum + Location, offset = log(MM), family = "poisson", data = model.df) There are two

Ok, very frustrated after spending most of the day onthe * irc channel with little to no help. Mostly just a bunch of crap about being a newbie, going and reading voip-info.org. etc. Despite me doing all that already. My situation is not good but here it is. Hurricane came through, power spikes killed PBX. Just trying to replace it affordable and possibly with a few more features. I am using *

--------------eth0---80.48.56.70---------- -------------80.48.56.65 ISP | my | router1 | | | linux | | | router2 ------------eth1---192.168.200.10----- ----------------192.168.1.1 ISP I''ve two ip from my isp one public and one internal. ISP have two routers router1 is gw for public ip and router2 is gw for internal

snat not working my local ip is aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa asterisk sitting on the internet at ip bbb.bbb.bbb.bbb my firewall''s internal ip is 192.168.0.254 i did snat: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j SNAT --to aaa.aaa.aaa iptables -t nat -L -v gives: Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 23663 packets, 2182K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 33056

Hi, I have got a problem with the semantics of file permissions on a file system mounted by smbmount on a Linux box (kernel 2.2.14, Samba 2.0.6, and after looking through the 2.0.7 announcement, it appears that the problem has not been addressed there). Consider the following case: I mount a share from an NT server on a Linux box, which I then use at the Linux box. I create a file on that

Hi, We have just built a server with a terabyte of storage for a powerquest deploycenter file server, the deploycenter boot disks start Caldera DR-DOS 7.02 for the actual deploycenter software to run under. We run Linux 7.3 with the samba that ships with that version (sorry, I can't remember off hand and don't have access to a linux box right now) The problem I have is that the

hi for those who was fallowing this topic I can say that IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED must be disabled! After few tests I''m quite sure that this was cousing my problems. Now I''m using 2.5.15 kernel without patch of Julian Anastasov and load-balancing is working. lartc split-access how to and http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt now both are working fine Now I will try to use fwmark

I''m a little confused about the many ways I''ve read that can be used for traffic load balancing, that is, two or more interfaces to the outside world being used transparently and efficiently by the internal machines. I heard about: a) netfilter SNAT to more than one IP. If I''m correct, this is only a round robin, that is, one connection goes here, the other goes there,

That sounds great to me, thanks Jake. I'm not Jurgen either, of course, but I'm happy to assist you if he is unavailable. I'm not also not qualified to audit the license, but do note Apple formally also released some code at https://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/tapi/. If there's anything else I can do to help, let me know. Cheers, John On 04/10/2018 06:13 PM, Jake Ehrlich

On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 09:33 -0400, Kurt Guenther wrote: > It looks like the reply to isn''t set up on the list server? No it''s changed. In a nut shell. Hitting reply sends reply to sender of email. Defaults to private. Just about every mailer has a Reply To All, which does just that. So in the case of mailing lists. It seems many are migrating in that direction. Which

I''ve been reading about multipath routes and found something that no howto I saw mentioned so far: multipath algorithms. The kernel has the followings: # zgrep MULTIPATH_ /proc/config.gz CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR=m CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM=m CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_WRANDOM=m CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_DRR=m CONFIG_DM_MULTIPATH_EMC iproute2

hi is there a filesize limitation for flac files because of the encoder or decoder for some reason?