similar to: ext3-0.0.7a for 2.2.19 is released

Hi, i am seeing something interesting since the upgrade to 2.2.19/0.0.7a - I am experimenting with the am930 wireless driver and i am crashing on module exit. Everytime i reboot afterwards the var fs on /dev/hda8 is inconsistent [...] Checking all file systems... Parallelizing fsck version 1.21-WIP (01-Jun-2001) /dev/hda7: recovering journal /dev/hda7: clean, 39160/320640 files, 354596/640702

hi, is this rpms differ from redhat's rawhide 2.4.5 kernel which seems to contain ext3. so my question that your rpm contain different ext3 than rh's rpm? or I can simple use rh's rawhide rpms? thanks. yours. ps. please reply to my private address to since I'm not on the list. thanks. > Hi, > > Mostly for my own use, I prepared two kernel RPM's with Ext3 in them.

Hi all, ext3-0.0.5c is now up at: ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/ and ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/ The most important part of this release is the e2fsprogs: e2fsck now supports the journal changes for metadata-only journaling. Ted, I've changed around the use of jfs* include files in e2fsprogs quite heavily here. In each build directory --- the lib/ext2fs

Hi, after my X froze i had a fs inconsistency after the journal replay [...] EXT3-fs: 03:06: 1 orphan inode deleted EXT3-fs: recovery complete. EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. Freeing unused kernel memory: 64k freed INIT: version 2.78 booting Loading /etc/console-tools/default.kmap.gz Activating swap... Adding Swap: 264560k

Hi all, ext3-0.0.6b is now available at the usual places: ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/ and ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/ The only significant change in this release is the fix to the orphan list recovery, and that fix also affects e2fsprogs, so please pick up the new e2fsprogs from the same directory when you grab the ext3 release. I've put tarballs,

Hello All, I have a production server that is running 2.2.20. This server *has* to be up 24X7 - what I'm wondering is: 1) Is ext3 on 2.2.20 rock stable? Or, would you recommend that I just stay with ext2? 2) I have looked far and wide for a the ext3 patch for 2.2.20 - where can I find it? 3) Were are the e2fsprogs that are appropriate to run with the 2.2.X kernel series? Thanks,

Hi, ext3-0.0.5d.tar.gz is now up on ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/ and ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/ as patches against 2.2.18. This only contains the kernel bits: we're in the process of syncing up on some e2fsprogs so I'll do another release shortly once we've got all of the pending changes for the user-mode tools assembled. This release is mostly

The latest errata kernel-2.2.19-6.2.7.src.rpm contains old patches linux-2.2.17-ext3.patch linux-2.2.17-kdb+ext3.patch Is there somewhere a 0.0.7a version of the above that will patch cleanly in the errata kernel (considering all the other patches that get applied before ext3)? I read about ftp://ftp.clusterfilesystem.com/pub/ext3 but when I do $ rpm -qpl

Hi, i am seeing a crash in ext3_new_block quiet often today on 2.2.19 0.0.7a fsck 1.21 ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.2.19. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.2.19/ (default) -m /boot/System.map-2.2.19 (default) Warning: You did not tell me where to find symbol information. I will assume that the log matches the

Hi, ext3-0.0.6a has been uploaded to ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/ext3-0.0.6a.tar.gz and ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/ext3-0.0.6a.tar.gz This version changes the way dirty buffers are marked to protect against device drivers which might block in the ll_rw_block() function. (Loop and lvm are examples.) It should also fix a rare but persistent report of

got the following in the freshmeat newsletter. the page doesn't say anything about it. also the sct dir on kernel.org still shows the WIP version... [007] - e2fsprogs 1.20 (Default)   by P. Adami (http://freshmeat.net/users/ramirez/)   Monday, May 28th 2001 19:39 The ext2fsprogs package contains essential ext2 filesystem utilities which consists of e2fsck, mke2fs, debugfs, dumpe2fs, tune2fs,

Hi, I have uploaded ext3-0.0.5b.tar.gz to ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/fs/ext3/test/ and ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/test/ New in this release is a functionally complete implementation of metadata-only journaling: data writes will no longer have to be written to the journal. Journaling still imposes some extra serialisation points between interacting processes, so

Hi everyone, I've been reading this mailing list once in a while and I have seen that there are quite a few bugs that were resolved since EXT 0.0.7a. I was wondering if using 0.0.7a with kernel 2.2.19 is dangerous or ok because I have had some corrupted files once in a while (using compact flash disk CF on IDE bus). 0.0.7a is the only patch available for kernel 2.2.19 to my knowledge are

Hi! A few weeks ago we upgraded 9 large webservers from ext2 to ext3. Since then we've seen very strange behavior on several of the machines. Permissions of files are repeatedly changed at random occasions. Several times, ownership of files have been totally mangled. Several users have logged in to discover that all their files suddenly are owned by another user! At two of these occasions

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Right now, every release of e2fsprogs, I do the following: ./configure --enable-elf-shlibs && make && make install rm config.cache && rm config.status ./configure && make install-libs Are these two seperate steps necessary? Seems to me that I had a problem installing something or other and it suggested the first line.

SYSTEM: rh6x based system, 2.2.19-6.2.7 rh errata kernel + 0.0.7a patch, I rebuilt rpm for i686; celeron466, 64MB, PIIX4. root fs is on software raid1 ext2, 6 additional fs's on software raid1 ext2. There's a 3rd HD, not mirrored, which is mounted ext3. EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. I enabled journal with tune2fs -j with unmounted fs. The 3 HDs are tuned with

We have a machine that is trying its darndest to house a linux kernel cvs repository. The machine is a dual 733mhz p3 netfinity of some kind. 512M of mem. Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 16484504 4015876 11631240 26% / /dev/sda2 31079 3199 26276 11% /boot /dev/sdb2 16516084 32828 15644264 1%

While ripping one of my cds on my laptop this happened: Message from syslogd@theirongiant at Thu Jul 5 09:52:16 2001 ... theirongiant kernel: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c line 551: "handle->h_buffer_credits > 0" from the kern.log: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c line 551: "handle->h_buffer_credits > 0"

Hello all. I am currently using ext3 0.0.5d with great success. I am a bit conflicted about what to tell the system regarding my root filesystem however. I have my root filesystem configured and working as an ext3 filesystem, but it is/was not without some fraught. Using RedHat 7.0, if you simply create your journal on the root file- system, figure out it's inode number, issue a lilo -R

Hello, Now that kernel 2.2.20 is out with security fixes, I'd be interested in using it with ext3. The latest patch for 2.2.19, 0.0.7a, applies with some offset (both with and without kdb), and even compiles (without kdb), but I scarcely know what I am doing so haven't tried it yet. Could people in the know enlighten me on that point? I guess there is little chance for another ext3