similar to: Problem solved - Re: Can not copy file, "The Path is too deep"

This is Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0 server. It has the following samba packages installed: samba-3.0.2-6.3E samba-swat-3.0.2-6.3E redhat-config-samba-1.0.16-1 samba-common-3.0.2-6.3E samba-client-3.0.2-6.3E It is a standalone domain member server, joined to WinNT 4.0 domain. Everything works fine, except I could not copy large file from Windows to Samba share, always got this "The Path is

I recently installed Samba 2.2.5 from the FreeBSD ports. It seems Samba works fine when browsing the Samba server from WinXP client, etc. I can copy files from the Samba server, and even create small files and copy small files TO the Samba server. The problem seems to be if I try to copy any file greater than 16Kbytes or so to the Samba server. When I do so, Windows XP complains with an error:

Hello everyone, I have two vectors having only one element different: vector1 vector2 vector1 TWC TWC TWC VFC TWX NA VIA/B VFC VFC

Hi It seems that selecting an element of a factor will copy its levels (Ubuntu 13.04, R 3.0.2). Below is the output of a script that creates a factor with 10000 elements and then calls as.list() on it. The new object seems to use more than 700 MB, and inspection of the levels of the individual elements of the list suggest that they are distinct objects. Perhaps some performance gain could

Some one else (not me -- I have RedHat 7 and can't seem to get a compiler to work) built the current Corel WPO CVS WINE and it seems to work OK except that when I close an application with a full screen it remembers that. But, when I reopen it it is a little to my left and too high to see the decorations on the window frame. Can this be changed with a configuration file somewhere or

Hello, I was wondering if there is an example list somewhere of whole program optimizations done by LLVM based compilers? I'm only familiar with method-level optimizations, and I'm being told wpo can deliver many great speedups. My language is currently staticly typed JIT based and uses the JVM, and I want to move it over to LLVM so that I can have options where it can be ahead of time

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > That sounds plausible to me. It seems like we might need a way of > representing call graph profiling in addition to the existing branch > probabilities? > Agreed. An important consideration here is WPO vs. LTO vs. TU-at-a-time call graphs. > FWIW, the greedy register allocator’s live range

I have two systems on different subnets that are to be members of the same domain; nether are the domain master. I am running RedHat Enterprise 3 Update 2 on each. Both are running samba-common-3.0.2-6.3E samba-client-3.0.2-6.3E samba-3.0.2-6.3E Both are using the smb.conf except with changes on their netbios name and interfaces to reflect their identies. One runs with no problem s.

Hi, I'm seeing periodic packet loss with tinc (1.0.16). I have 'ReplayWindow = 0' in config, and ping between the hosts is perfect. I suspect the packets are identified and then dropped by the Great Firewall. My question is: can it be identified by DPI? If yes, how should I improve tinc to avoid this? Thanks in advance. Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi, I'm seeing periodic packet loss with tinc (1.0.16). I have 'ReplayWindow = 0' in config, and ping between the hosts is perfect. I suspect the packets are identified and then dropped by the Great Firewall. My question is: can it be identified by DPI? If yes, how should I improve tinc to avoid this? Thanks in advance. Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Thanks, Philip for the "lay of the ground" picture. I think the situation I'm in, which represents my employment (and now personal technical curiosity) is that we're seeing LLVM implementations show up like every other week or month, etc. and people are asking us, "well this mathematical software of yours is great, but my engineer here tells me it's not using this LLVM

> On Oct 13, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > > >> On 10/13/2014 03:23 PM, Kevin Modzelewski wrote: >> With the patchpoint infrastructure, shouldn't it now be relatively straightforward to do an accurate-but-non-relocatable scan of the stack, by attaching all the GC roots as stackmap arguments to patchpoints? This is

I wanna make a method that can deep copy an ActiveRecord to a new one, but it seems a little difficult , how to do it? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe

Does LLVM offer any way of obtaining a deep copy of a CFG, that is all the basic blocks of a function and their instructions. I'm asking because I would like to implement continuations in my VM and I need to create a modified version of some functions. I thought a simple way of doing this would be to modify a copy of the code generated for the orignal function. This would be simpler than

I am handling spatial data of huge volumes, so sensitive to the silent duplication of data in script programs. In the following R program, exactly when is the vector data deeply copied? Thanks in advance. 1 v <- 1:10000 2 z <- f(v) --------- function f ---------- 3 f <- function(x) { 4 y = x 5 y[10] = 1 6 xf = date.frame(x=x) 7 xf$x[10] = 1 8

Is putting a variable into a list a deep copy (and is tracemem the correct way to confirm)? warmstrong at krypton:~/dvl/R.packages$ R > x <- rnorm(1000) > tracemem(x) [1] "<0x3214c90>" > x.list <- list(x.in.list=x) tracemem[0x3214c90 -> 0x2af0a20]: > Is it possible to put a variable into a list without causing a deep copy (i.e. if you _really_ want the

Hi, Has anyone any idea why when i'm trying to copy a file to a samba share it takes a long time and finally says 'Path is too deep'? Thanks for any suggestions ------------- Kristyan Osborne IT Technician Longhill High School 01273 391672 ------ Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open windows. Win95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell

With the patchpoint infrastructure, shouldn't it now be relatively straightforward to do an accurate-but-non-relocatable scan of the stack, by attaching all the GC roots as stackmap arguments to patchpoints? This is something we're currently working on for Pyston (ie we don't have it working yet), but I think we might get it "for free" once we finish the work on frame

dear sir, I have samba 2.2.3a running on RedHat linux 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7-10 all other computers on the network are windows XP machines. I do NOT have any problems when reading with windows XP from any share in the linux server, however when i try to copy a file to the share, my windowsXP explorer stops responding for about 30 secs and then gives the error-message 'could not copy file:

Hi All; I'm currently trying to expand my Samba env by including my IBM z/800 mainframe running 64 bit RHEL v3.0, CUPS printing environment into Samba. When I start Samba, the nmbd dies almost immediately. Any insight would be greatly appreciated. [root@stlpr003 root]# rpm -qa | egrep "kern|samba" kernel-2.4.21-9.0.1.EL ... samba-common-3.0.2-6.3E samba-3.0.2-6.3E