similar to: ADS

I am completely frustrated at this point. The following is not meant against you personally, but I'm the ONLY I.T. person for 100 users in 6 different offices, and I don't know what to do at this point but beg. I finally figured out what Heimdal is, and I believe is the main problem. Installed 5.2.1 on a machine. Installed krb5 from ports. Changed make.conf adding

I'm about ready to smash my head through a wall...I could use a few answers. 1. When using security = ads, and completing net ads join, it was my understanding that samba authenticated username/pword against ads, and local posix accounts were nolonger needed, is this true? 2. If yes, I have not been able to get it to work. If I have a posix user account with the same name as one in

If your getting kinit problems with net ads join (don't bother with testjoin-it will error out no matter), do the following: 1. Change an administrators password, especially if you upgraded from NT 4. 2. Create a krb5.conf file int /etc that looks like this: logging] default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log

Tom sent me a private email. I replied and got this back. From: Mail Administrator <Postmaster@cox.net> Reply-To: Postmaster@cox.net To: craigwhite@azapple.com Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 01:44:16 -0500

I'm having a problem with Roaming profiles in Windows XP with Samba as PDC. I've googled and trolled the mailing lists and read the Samba documentation. Problem: User logs onto domain from WinXP client and profile is downloaded (you can tell because it takes a long time and lights on hub are lit up). However, unless that user is in the admin group locally, all/some of the profile

Having some issues with: samba_dnsupdate Specifically: /usr/bin/nsupdate: cannot specify -g or -o, program not linked with GSS API Library I've looked through the script, and cannot find these options called. If anyone can point me to where they're called I'd appreciate it. Cheers, TMS III

Having some difficulties determining which way to go here. Have an Ubuntu 10.2 server running S4Alpha11. The samba stuff is working well enough (though with a bit too much idle CPU consumption--haven't go there yet). However, I can't get proper responses for file system and user/group lookup. With AD in Samba 3 nsswitch.conf was passwd: files winbind group: files

hi i m using the script below ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iptables -F iptables -t nat -F iptables -P INPUT DROP iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT

What's going on? Have you pulled it? Like to know. Last official email said to use 3.0.4 as production release. TMS III

I'm running Samba 3.0.5 on FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 and I'm having some oddities with an smb share. Observe: /:mount_smbfs //user_name@NODE15/ftp /mnt Password: /:cd mnt/incoming/ /mnt/incoming:ls -l /mnt/incoming:touch test ***** Notice output of next command ***** /mnt/incoming:ls -l /mnt/incoming:ls -l test -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Aug 4 17:13 test /mnt/incoming:cd / /:umount

Hello, I am running a Samba server (3.0.7) on a Suse 9.2 box. I have connected this server successfully to a Windows 2000 Active Directory (mixed mode). I have nsswitch.conf, krb5.conf configured and winbind seems to be running properly for the most part. With wbinfo I can get all of my user and group information. Problem is, it seems that at random times, the samba server just stops

Apparently this didn't/doesn't build on FreeBSD by default...or is it "doesn't build at all". If it is buildable, what should I do to build it, as without it...see wiki: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Winbind Cheers, TMS III

I know 5.1 isn't considered part of -stable, but it doesn't really seem like -current either, so I'm asking here. If this is the wrong place please let me know where I should be. At work I have a 5.1-R box that I'm trying to use to mount shares from a Sun box running samba 2.2.0 as well as some Win2K boxes. Both the sun and win2k machines authenticate to the company's domain

Just thought I'd say that samba4 is working quite nicely. Samba4 DC on Ubuntu server. Added a W2k3R2 and W2k8R2 server as DC's. Took a little bit of play to get it done, but not much. The only thing I've noticed so far (still in early lab stage) is a GC issue. Now if I can upgrade a Samba3-LDAP domain.... Cheers, TMS III

On 2/24/2020 12:47 AM, TomK via samba wrote: > On 2/23/2020 2:54 PM, TomK via samba wrote: >> On 2/23/2020 11:44 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 23/02/2020 16:05, TomK wrote: >>>> On 2/21/2020 9:18 PM, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 20:48 -0500, TomK wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>

Thanks TMS, that is not a major problem as of now.. i dont know why but i m facing many problems/errors while using samba :). now the major problem is wbinfo -g is not showing the full list. only few domain groups it is showing . do u have any idea about this ??? .please help On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:44 PM, <tms3 at tms3.com> wrote: > > > > --- Original message --- >

Hi Tim et al., Yes, I can see that the new behaviour would seem like an 'optimization', possibly especially for large files, in that it saves the unlink operation. was (quasi): unlink, open(write), write data, close now is (quasi): open(write, truncate), write data, close However, this old behaviour enabled my rather nice hard link copy (cheap!) local backup. The question is, is the

On 2/23/2020 2:54 PM, TomK via samba wrote: > On 2/23/2020 11:44 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 23/02/2020 16:05, TomK wrote: >>> On 2/21/2020 9:18 PM, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 20:48 -0500, TomK wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Sadly this really appears

Samba4 latest on FreeBSD8.1RC2 built and running as a joined DC: 81rc2# pwd /usr/local/samba/sbin 81rc2# ps -ax | grep samba 92436 ?? Ss 0:00.24 ./samba 92437 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba 92438 ?? I 0:00.04 ./samba 92439 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba 92440 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92441 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92442 ?? S 0:00.00 ./samba 92443 ?? S 0:00.01 ./samba

When I use mount_smbfs I receive such message: # mount_smbfs -W sbrc -U Kid -E koi8-r:cp1251 -Iradius.sbrc.local //Kid@radius/MUSIC$ /home/anonftp/.2 mount_smbfs: can't get server address `radius.sbrc.local': Resolver Error 0 (no error) mount_smbfs: can't get server address: syserr = Network is down Network is up in fact, dns server resolves name, but I receive this message