similar to: Let's be together in the fight for life!

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Let's be together in the fight for life!"

2004 Jan 16
0
2.88MB Floppy
Hi, Hope you don't mind, would like to check that whether could the 2.88MB Floppy drive to read a 1.44MB Floppy Disk ? Know any company still producing the 2.88MB Floppy Disks ? Many Thanks. and have a wonderful day. Best Regards, Chew, Siak Koon (Mr) Assistant IS Manager Expeditors (Malaysia) - Penang Tel : 604-6307007 Fax : 604-6428441 Mobile : 6012-474 6933 eMail :
2010 Sep 21
1
reshape is re-ordering my variables
Is it an undocumented (at least I missed it if it's documented) feature of the reshape function to do numeric variables followed by character? I ask because that seems to be the case below. > str(rcw) 'data.frame': 23 obs. of 21 variables: $ ICU : int 1 18 17 9 22 19 6 16 25 26 ... $ Q6.RC.1 : chr "SM" "JF" "IW"
2006 Apr 11
1
CentOS Wiki - Fight FUD?
In the up and coming wiki, don't forget to have an FAQ/Fight against FUD section. Looking at the web in January an upstream vendor employee said some things in his wiki. In Feb/March CentOS was discussed on the Fedora-list/Slashdot. - Common myths about the legality/ethicality of CentOS - CentOS providing value to Open Source as a whole - Projects emanating from CentOS like SMEServer
2015 Mar 15
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Bikeshedding commit message policy - Round 3 - Fight!
On 15 March 2015 at 16:31, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > I don't want to code when to use them. But it makes sense to say, "If you want to include a title tag, do it like this...". I'm ok with that. So, do we have consensus? 1. Don't require, but recommend using [] for tags. 2. Don't specify attribution more than just "patch by Foo." and
2015 Feb 09
0
Postfix , Dovecot & the Spam fight
Am 09.02.2015 um 22:29 schrieb Leander Sch?fer: > I'm currently busy with a substiution of my current mail server. I'm > currently using > > * Clam-SMTP and > * SpamAssassin > > to fight Spam. I wonder if it is worth implementing AmaViS with > SpamAssassin backend instead and also using AmaViS to speak to clamd > directly. But I more and more wonder wether
2006 Oct 07
0
[Bug 1049] Variable delay in password logins to fight dictionary attacks
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1049 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #3 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-10-07 11:40 ------- Change all RESOLVED bug to CLOSED with the exception
2005 May 31
2
[Bug 1049] Variable delay in password logins to fight dictionary attacks
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1049 Summary: Variable delay in password logins to fight dictionary attacks Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:
2015 Mar 15
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Bikeshedding commit message policy - Round 3 - Fight!
On 15 March 2015 at 15:06, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > I used to use CSE:, but have now switched to using [CSE] because that seems to be the prevailing convention (and is somewhat more visually distinctive). I think it makes sense to codify that convention, but not to require them. Sometimes, there is nothing appropriate to use. Sometimes, the first or second word of the
2015 Mar 15
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Bikeshedding commit message policy - Round 3 - Fight!
On 15 March 2015 at 20:22, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Can you post the entire revised diff that you want to include? Is it Diff 21913 on Phab? If so, LGTM. Hi Chris, Here's the final version: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8197 cheers, --renato
2008 Feb 01
1
Rails routing and active scaffold fight to the death
Just kidding, it''s not as bad as it seems. Right now I don''t have much in my route.rb, and I''m getting this in my console: Processing ApplicationController#index (for 127.0.0.1 at 2008-02-01 14:54:00) [GET] [2008-02-01 14:54:00] (552) INFO Session ID: a8eeb58764d872bbd1fdb337636e68e7 [2008-02-01 14:54:00] (552) INFO Parameters: {} [2008-02-01 14:54:00] (552)
2005 Aug 12
5
PXE/Memdisk/bootimage having a fight
I have tried to get this working SO many times, everywhere I look on the web tells me i have this correct. I have the following stanza in my /tftboot/lts/pxelinux.cfg/default label Ghost kernel memdisk append initrd=netboot.img For some reason, it doesn't work - I get the error messages Missing parameter in config file Could not find kernel image: linux boot: The netboot.img is in the
2002 Feb 07
3
Promise TX2 and ATARAID....... kjouirnald and kupdated seem to fight it out for reasourses
What is really puzzling me is that the ataraid device (/dev/ataraid/d0p1 mounted as /bigdisk) 2x 123GB IBM Deskstar's is formated as ext2...top and ps etc... show a fight between kjournald and kupdated and all searches for kjournald or kupdated fights suggest ext3 issues... :-) It's a RedHat 7.2, 2.4.7-10 custom kernal (I added in the Promise FastTrak support and HIGH mem support to
2015 Feb 09
3
Postfix , Dovecot & the Spam fight
Hi, I'm currently busy with a substiution of my current mail server. I'm currently using * Clam-SMTP and * SpamAssassin to fight Spam. I wonder if it is worth implementing AmaViS with SpamAssassin backend instead and also using AmaViS to speak to clamd directly. But I more and more wonder wether AmaViS is even worth it?! It currently looks to me as if AmaViS is eating LOTS of
2015 Mar 14
2
[LLVMdev] Bikeshedding commit message policy - Round 3 - Fight!
Folks, On review http://reviews.llvm.org/D8197, we're basically down to two bikeshedding issues: 1. Title tags Some people use "[CSE] Change blah", others use "CSE: Change blah". I hadn't put anything regarding tags because not everyone use it and when they do, it's slightly different. I personally don't think it's a reason to argue about, so I'm in
2014 Feb 07
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] LCSSA vs. SSAUpdater ... FIGHT!
On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:33 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > >> So, there are two primary ideas behind SSA form management in the loop optimizers of LLVM: >> >> - Require LCSSA form input, leverage its (very powerful) guarantees to simplify maintaining SSA
2004 Apr 18
0
Fedora, Cups, print$, and Windows XP - Oh my :) Round 2 - FIGHT
Hello from Canada! I'm posting again about a problem I posted about in February, I'll repost the message here, with updated information. When I read that it was a possible/probably bug with Samba, I decided to wait a while and see if it wasn't hashed out by now. It doesn't appear to be fixed (or I messed up). Anyways, here is the information with updates. A "*" indicates
2002 Aug 27
0
Rsync question.
Tarun: I don't use rsync to windows - just too much trouble and no need, but, I think the problem is the embedded colon in the path. Administrator@USB-FLATUS ~ $ touch abc:def Administrator@USB-FLATUS ~ $ ls -l abc* -rw-r--r-- 1 Administ None 0 Aug 27 12:34 abc Administrator@USB-FLATUS ~ $ rm abc:def Administrator@USB-FLATUS ~ $ tar -tvf /n/a.tar -rw-r--r-- tconway/Vlsieng 29
2004 Aug 07
0
Can You Last 36 Hours E|R|E|C|T|I|O|N? zas
User ID: 2 bushel Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 02:29:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--197563323375802931" ----197563323375802931 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Syslinux <html> <body text=black bgcolor=white link=blue alink=blue vlink=blue> <center> <b><font color=blue>Wanted to try Cialis
2020 Feb 05
0
Samba, ACLs and 'primary group'...
On 05/02/2020 11:39, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > My previous email on this topic get no answer, i try to explain me > better. > > > The problem. > > Simply i was (ab)used, in my previous samba NT-mode domains, to have > file created with the group-owner as the UNIX primary group; now, in > AD, files get created group-owned by Windows primary group, eg 'Domain
2007 Sep 16
10
I lost the RSpec fight
I''ve been working on a Rails project with one other developer; he was using Test::Unit, and I was using RSpec. That works OK for a while, but obviously it starts causing pain when you have to check in two places to see if a piece of code is properly tested/spec''d, you can''t use TextMate shortcuts to switch back and forth between code and test, you have to duplicate