Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Let's be together in the fight for life!"
2004 Jan 16
0
2.88MB Floppy
Hi,
Hope you don't mind, would like to check that whether could the
2.88MB Floppy drive to read a 1.44MB Floppy Disk ?
Know any company still producing the 2.88MB Floppy Disks ?
Many Thanks.
and have a wonderful day.
Best Regards,
Chew, Siak Koon (Mr)
Assistant IS Manager
Expeditors (Malaysia) - Penang
Tel : 604-6307007 Fax : 604-6428441 Mobile : 6012-474 6933
eMail :
2010 Sep 21
1
reshape is re-ordering my variables
Is it an undocumented (at least I missed it if it's documented) feature
of the reshape function to do numeric variables followed by character?
I ask because that seems to be the case below.
> str(rcw)
'data.frame': 23 obs. of 21 variables:
$ ICU : int 1 18 17 9 22 19 6 16 25 26 ...
$ Q6.RC.1 : chr "SM" "JF" "IW"
2006 Apr 11
1
CentOS Wiki - Fight FUD?
In the up and coming wiki, don't forget to have an
FAQ/Fight against FUD section. Looking at the web in
January an upstream vendor employee said some things
in his wiki. In Feb/March CentOS was discussed on the
Fedora-list/Slashdot.
- Common myths about the legality/ethicality of CentOS
- CentOS providing value to Open Source as a whole
- Projects emanating from CentOS like SMEServer
2015 Mar 15
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Bikeshedding commit message policy - Round 3 - Fight!
On 15 March 2015 at 16:31, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> I don't want to code when to use them. But it makes sense to say, "If you want to include a title tag, do it like this...".
I'm ok with that.
So, do we have consensus?
1. Don't require, but recommend using [] for tags.
2. Don't specify attribution more than just "patch by Foo." and
2015 Feb 09
0
Postfix , Dovecot & the Spam fight
Am 09.02.2015 um 22:29 schrieb Leander Sch?fer:
> I'm currently busy with a substiution of my current mail server. I'm
> currently using
>
> * Clam-SMTP and
> * SpamAssassin
>
> to fight Spam. I wonder if it is worth implementing AmaViS with
> SpamAssassin backend instead and also using AmaViS to speak to clamd
> directly. But I more and more wonder wether
2006 Oct 07
0
[Bug 1049] Variable delay in password logins to fight dictionary attacks
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1049
dtucker at zip.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Comment #3 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-10-07 11:40 -------
Change all RESOLVED bug to CLOSED with the exception
2005 May 31
2
[Bug 1049] Variable delay in password logins to fight dictionary attacks
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1049
Summary: Variable delay in password logins to fight dictionary
attacks
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 3.8.1p1
Platform: ix86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo:
2015 Mar 15
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Bikeshedding commit message policy - Round 3 - Fight!
On 15 March 2015 at 15:06, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> I used to use CSE:, but have now switched to using [CSE] because that seems to be the prevailing convention (and is somewhat more visually distinctive). I think it makes sense to codify that convention, but not to require them. Sometimes, there is nothing appropriate to use. Sometimes, the first or second word of the
2015 Mar 15
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Bikeshedding commit message policy - Round 3 - Fight!
On 15 March 2015 at 20:22, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you post the entire revised diff that you want to include? Is it Diff 21913 on Phab? If so, LGTM.
Hi Chris,
Here's the final version:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8197
cheers,
--renato
2008 Feb 01
1
Rails routing and active scaffold fight to the death
Just kidding, it''s not as bad as it seems. Right now I don''t have
much in my route.rb, and I''m getting this in my console:
Processing ApplicationController#index (for 127.0.0.1 at 2008-02-01
14:54:00) [GET]
[2008-02-01 14:54:00] (552) INFO Session ID:
a8eeb58764d872bbd1fdb337636e68e7
[2008-02-01 14:54:00] (552) INFO Parameters: {}
[2008-02-01 14:54:00] (552)
2005 Aug 12
5
PXE/Memdisk/bootimage having a fight
I have tried to get this working SO many times, everywhere I look on
the web tells me i have this correct.
I have the following stanza in my /tftboot/lts/pxelinux.cfg/default
label Ghost
kernel memdisk
append initrd=netboot.img
For some reason, it doesn't work - I get the error messages
Missing parameter in config file
Could not find kernel image: linux
boot:
The netboot.img is in the
2002 Feb 07
3
Promise TX2 and ATARAID....... kjouirnald and kupdated seem to fight it out for reasourses
What is really puzzling me is that the ataraid device (/dev/ataraid/d0p1 mounted as /bigdisk)
2x 123GB IBM Deskstar's is formated as ext2...top and ps etc... show a fight between kjournald and kupdated
and all searches for kjournald or kupdated fights suggest ext3 issues... :-)
It's a RedHat 7.2, 2.4.7-10 custom kernal (I added in the Promise FastTrak support and HIGH mem support
to
2015 Feb 09
3
Postfix , Dovecot & the Spam fight
Hi,
I'm currently busy with a substiution of my current mail server. I'm
currently using
* Clam-SMTP and
* SpamAssassin
to fight Spam. I wonder if it is worth implementing AmaViS with
SpamAssassin backend instead and also using AmaViS to speak to clamd
directly. But I more and more wonder wether AmaViS is even worth it?! It
currently looks to me as if AmaViS is eating LOTS of
2015 Mar 14
2
[LLVMdev] Bikeshedding commit message policy - Round 3 - Fight!
Folks,
On review http://reviews.llvm.org/D8197, we're basically down to two
bikeshedding issues:
1. Title tags
Some people use "[CSE] Change blah", others use "CSE: Change blah". I
hadn't put anything regarding tags because not everyone use it and
when they do, it's slightly different. I personally don't think it's a
reason to argue about, so I'm in
2014 Feb 07
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] LCSSA vs. SSAUpdater ... FIGHT!
On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:33 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So, there are two primary ideas behind SSA form management in the loop optimizers of LLVM:
>>
>> - Require LCSSA form input, leverage its (very powerful) guarantees to simplify maintaining SSA
2004 Apr 18
0
Fedora, Cups, print$, and Windows XP - Oh my :) Round 2 - FIGHT
Hello from Canada!
I'm posting again about a problem I posted about in February, I'll repost
the message here, with updated information. When I read that it was a
possible/probably bug with Samba, I decided to wait a while and see if it
wasn't hashed out by now. It doesn't appear to be fixed (or I messed up).
Anyways, here is the information with updates. A "*" indicates
2002 Aug 27
0
Rsync question.
Tarun: I don't use rsync to windows - just too much trouble and no need,
but, I think the problem is the embedded colon in the path.
Administrator@USB-FLATUS ~
$ touch abc:def
Administrator@USB-FLATUS ~
$ ls -l abc*
-rw-r--r-- 1 Administ None 0 Aug 27 12:34 abc
Administrator@USB-FLATUS ~
$ rm abc:def
Administrator@USB-FLATUS ~
$ tar -tvf /n/a.tar
-rw-r--r-- tconway/Vlsieng 29
2004 Aug 07
0
Can You Last 36 Hours E|R|E|C|T|I|O|N? zas
User ID: 2 bushel
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 02:29:50 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--197563323375802931"
----197563323375802931
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Syslinux
<html>
<body text=black bgcolor=white link=blue alink=blue vlink=blue>
<center>
<b><font color=blue>Wanted to try Cialis
2020 Feb 05
0
Samba, ACLs and 'primary group'...
On 05/02/2020 11:39, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote:
> My previous email on this topic get no answer, i try to explain me
> better.
>
>
> The problem.
>
> Simply i was (ab)used, in my previous samba NT-mode domains, to have
> file created with the group-owner as the UNIX primary group; now, in
> AD, files get created group-owned by Windows primary group, eg 'Domain
2007 Sep 16
10
I lost the RSpec fight
I''ve been working on a Rails project with one other developer; he was
using Test::Unit, and I was using RSpec. That works OK for a while, but
obviously it starts causing pain when you have to check in two places to
see if a piece of code is properly tested/spec''d, you can''t use TextMate
shortcuts to switch back and forth between code and test, you have to
duplicate