similar to: RES: squid authentication to samba 3

You should use the ntlm_auth module provided by samba. -----Mensagem original----- De: samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org] Em nome de Riccardo Baldanzi Enviada em: quinta-feira, 22 de abril de 2004 16:51 Para: samba@lists.samba.org Assunto: [Samba] Problems with ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp Hi Guys,

I've done that using pam_winbind + courier. -----Mensagem original----- De: samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org] Em nome de pll+samba@permabit.com Enviada em: quinta-feira, 3 de junho de 2004 11:06 Para: samba@lists.samba.org Assunto: [Samba] Samba and Kerberos Is there anyway to have Samba auth against Kerberos?

What do you mean with "... ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp does respond only BH..." ? Is it happing in a command line test ? Remember that this helper wait for a NTLM "hash" not a clear user and password, as basic helper does. The best way of testing is to put in use, inside the squid.conf. I've be using it for some months without problem. -----Mensagem

Isn't possible to test the ntlm_auth with the ntlmssp protocol in a command line mode, you must use a browser able to handle ntlm because only this sort of browser send the appropriate ntlm challenges, try IE. Estevam Henrique -----Mensagem original----- De: samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org] Em nome de Champaka

Hi Thomas, I ran Samba-3.0.2a + MIT Kerberos 1.3.3 with Windows 2000 without any problem, all the users was able to access the shares with their tickets, after migrate my W2K server to Windows 2003 no one can access the shares on the linux machine using its netbios name, it only works trough ip address. I've been many people reporting the same issue, but no one was able do answer. Hi samba

I also have made this configuration working with w2k, the problem is related do enc-types used by w2k3. I have seen a lot of people complaining about the same issue. Can the samba gurus help the community ??? What are the right configuration to put a Samba 3.0.x working as a Active Directory 2003 member and be accessible through \\<samba name>\<share name> ?! Please Jerry Carter,

INFORMACAO CONFIDENCIAL Prezado(a) Amigo(a): Esta carta/e-mail nada tem de semelhante As muitas "aldrabices" que circulam pela Internet. Ela ? uma mensagem rara que tem um conteUdo que pode modificar a sua vida para melhor. Assim, peco-lhe um pouco de paciencia, e que a leia com atencao, muita atencao, e no final, muito provavelmente, se sentira recompensado(a). Este e um assunto que

INFORMACAO CONFIDENCIAL Prezado(a) Amigo(a): Esta carta/e-mail nada tem de semelhante As muitas "aldrabices" que circulam pela Internet. Ela ? uma mensagem rara que tem um conteUdo que pode modificar a sua vida para melhor. Assim, peCo-lhe um pouco de paciencia, e que a leia com atencao, muita atencao, e no final, muito provavelmente, se sentira recompensado(a). Este e

Hi people, What are the pros and cons of Winbind, LDAP and Kerberos in a Samba 3.0.2 plus Active Directory environment ? What could be the best design for this scenario ? Estevam Henrique ========================================================= Esta mensagem pode conter informacao confidencial e/ou privilegiada. Se voce nao for o destinatario ou a pessoa autorizada a receber

Hi Jim, I did what the doc says but the problem is the same. Does anybody saw this work ? I mean, is the Samba 3.0.2a+Kerberos MIT 1.3.3 able to be accessed by a WXP, W2K or W2K3 machine, using Kerberos tickets generated in a Windows 2003 KDC (W2K3 AD) ? Thanks -----Mensagem original----- De: Jim McDonough [mailto:jmcd@us.ibm.com] Enviada em: segunda-feira, 19 de abril de 2004 17:07 Para:

Hi people, I have a Debian (Woody) 2.4.25+Samba 3.0.2a running, I've joined a Active Directory domain (net ads join) and I can successfully browse the AD users and groups with wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g. I need to give to the samba (Windows) users access do linux console/terminal, I've read the samba documentation about pam_winbind ( http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/winbind.html

As many of us suffer this problem I would like to share my success with the list. This weekend I made this configuration work ! After this procedure you can access the samba machine, from any client (Win-XP, Win2k, Win2k3, Win9x and WinNT) using \\samba-netbios-name\share-name (using kerberos) or \\samba-ip-address\share-name (using NTLM) Debian Woody 3.0R2 Samba-3.0.4 MIT Kerberos 1.3.4 Windows

Could you better describe your scenario ? Where are you trying to logging on ? >From where are you trying to logging on ? What kind of service are you trying to access ? -----Mensagem original----- De: samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org] Em nome de Talwar, Puneet (NIH/NIAID) Enviada em: ter?a-feira, 27 de abril de 2004

What do you mean with ADC Slave, security=ads in smb.conf ? -----Mensagem original----- De: samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+ecarvalho=bmf.com.br@lists.samba.org] Em nome de Bj?rn Giesler Enviada em: quarta-feira, 9 de junho de 2004 12:32 Para: samba@lists.samba.org Assunto: [Samba] Problem with authenticating a computer to a samba share Hi, I have a

Yes, List, I am an UML user that already have a real machine running 8 UML for: UML1..UML4 are used for connection to one leased line that is used for incoming/outgoing mail and incoming webmail accesses: UML1=internal firewall, connected to internal LAN UML2=mailrelay/dmz UML4=webrelay/dmz UML3=external firewall, connected to the NET UML5 and UML6 are used for connection to one ADSL line

Hi people, I have a Linux box running Samba 3.0.2a in ADS mode MIT Kerberos 1.3.3. My W2K e WXP users can't access the linux box by netbios name, the only access that works is by IP address, I know that's caused because access thought IP address don't make use of Kerberos. The most strange for me it's that the same environment works fine with a W2K Active Directory, I read in same

Hi everyone I have a Digium card TE110P and after plug it, turn on the computer and configure, the LEDs don't light up in spite of what Digium FAQ says about the LEDs: When will the LED's light up on my TDM400P/TE110P/TE2XXP/TE4XXP? ... The TE110P LED's will light up RED when the span is configured and kernel module is loaded. If configured correctly and a circuit or channel bank is

Have you locked at samba-3.0.2a/source/nsswitch directory ? Normally the pam modules and nss libs are there, you need manually copy that to /lib/security (Debian system. maybe different in your distribution) Also remember to run ldconfig after copy the files to the lib directory. Make sure that you /etc/pam.d/login is, some like that: passwd: winbind files shadow: files group:

It's very possible. I've put the suggested changes in place and recompiled on a test box, but my user is out of the office today and can't test it so I'll have to wait for hte weekend to pass. Thenks for the info. Mike -----Original Message----- From: mrojava4@eastgranby.k12.ct.us [mailto:mrojava4@eastgranby.k12.ct.us] Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 5:10 PM To: EXT-Auleta,

Esta e uma mensagem automatica. por favor nao responda ela. (This is an automatic message. Don't reply please) (see below for the english version) Voce enviou uma mensagem contaminada com o(s) virus: 00]/text infected: I-Worm.Sobig.f.txt /var/tmp/vir-1061498500-18279/email.eml/[From <samba@lists.samba.org>][Date Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:41:29 +0200]/document_all.pif packed: PE_Patch