similar to: windows permissions

I have a large dataset grouped by a factor and I want to perform a regression on each data subset based on this factor. There are many ways to do this, posted here and elsewhere. I have tried several. However I found one method posted on the R wiki which works exactly as I want, and I like the elegance and simplicity of the solution, but I don't understand how it works. Its all in the formula

I have a data frame with data similar to this: NameA GrpA NameB GrpB Dist A Alpha B Alpha 0.2 A Alpha C Beta 0.2 A Alpha D Beta 0.4 B Alpha C Beta 0.2 B Alpha D Beta 0.1 C Beta D Beta 0.3 Dist is a distance measure between two entities. The table displays all to all distances, but the

Hi, When I try to do anything on my samba system a connection is made to IPC$, but this is mapped to a directory /root/tmp. This seems odd. To make matters worse ordinary users cannot access this directory, so the only user who can access the IPC$ share (ie, do anything at all) is the root user. What have I don wrong. I cannot find any reference to IPC$ being linked to a directory

I have not really used lm before and I was hoping for some help on a simple problem. Here is a toy version of the problem I want to solve. y x grp -.9 1 a -.8 2 a -.7 3 a -.7 1.5 b -.5 2.5 b -.3 3.5 b -.19 2.7 c -.11 3.7 c -.41 4.7 c I want to fit a model that has one y-intercept and three slopes, one for

Hi, I have a problem with my Samba/WinBIND implementation. In folders shared by multiple people the last one to access and modify a file takes ownership of the file and changes the permissions so other users cannot make changes to the same file: [root@atlas PLANNING RECORDS]# cd REGIONAL\ 1\ AIRLINE\ DOCS/ [root@atlas REGIONAL 1 AIRLINE DOCS]# ls -al total 1232 drwxrws---+ 8 root

opensuse 10/find / samba-3.0.20b-3.3 I'm trying to change directory permissions on a share so all users can modify files in the share and when I do as suggested in Ch15 of Samba Howto the following happens $ find `directory_name' -type d -exec chown nobody:users {}\; find: missing argument to `-exec' Chris Boyd Systems Engineer USIT 19-21 Aston Quay Dublin 2 Ireland Tel: +353 1

Hi, I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1, testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only created with 660 permissions. Here are the ACL's of testshare: # file: testshare # owner: ralfgro # group: ve user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup1:rwx group:testgroup2:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::---

Hi there, I?ve been trying to get my head around a problem I have with Samba. I?ve set up Samba 3.6.13 on a Raspberry Pi with Arch Linux ARM on it and let it serve a couple of folders from an attached external ext4 drive mounted to /srv/cifs (of course with the "acl" option enabled). I?ve been trying to create a share that is read-writable for all members of a particular UNIX user

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-02-23 06:10 ------- what does "streaming" mean? what does "output reports" mean? do you have more detailed reports? do you have debugging output? what clients are involved? what servers? does the same happen with openssh 3.0.2? does the same happen with a recent

We are running a fileserver (Samba version 3.0.10-1.4E.9) on CentOS 4.4. No AD, clients are Windows XP and OS X. Linux acl's are used for access to directories and files. Each top-level folder belongs to a primary group with mode 2770. The acl's restrict access to lower level directories. We need to pass the acl's down the directory tree or else users may have unexpected access to

I have a Linux file server that is an AD Domain Member. It shares the following (smb.conf): [public] path = /public store dos attributes = no hide dot files = yes readonly = no force group = ohprs create mask = 0660 directory mask = 2770 The "force group" lets all Windows users map this folder and create files and directories that all users can access and update. They are created

Hi I want all files created in a share to be group owned by a group called staff. To do this I have a share called reports which is chmod g+s staff: drwxrws---+ 9 root staff 4096 Jun 18 11:15 reports If I create a file from Linux, the sticky bit works: -rw-rw----+ 1 steve2 staff 0 Jun 18 10:57 stevelinux.txt If I create it under windows, it doesn't: -rwxrwx---+ 1 steve2 Domain

On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:22:49 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have a Linux file server that is an AD Domain Member. It shares the > following (smb.conf): > > [public] > path = /public > store dos attributes = no > hide dot files = yes > readonly = no > force group = ohprs > create mask = 0660 > directory mask = 2770 >

Does samba returns the universal groups for the user using wbinfo or some other command? Does samba rettun the domain local group assigned to user for trusted domain? Suppose we have a forest with two domains A and B. Doamin B has a domain local group of 'grpB'. Domain A has a user called 'user1' and it is a member of "DomainB/grpB". Does samba return the above group

I ran into a problem today which surprised me, and after two hours of reading and testing I am more confused than ever, so I feel the need for a sanity check. It would be good to have a clear and authoritative article about this somewhere; I thought it would be in either "Using Samba" or in the HOWTO, but I don't see it there. I am using Samba in several installations in homes and

Hi I'm very new to Dovecot (been using Courier for 5 years), but I've been persuaded of the merits of Dovecot and since the server needs upgrading that seems like the perfect time/excuse. On a test server, I set up postfix and installed Dovecot (running 32-bit Debian Squeeze, installed from apt-get). I mirrored the mail store (Maildirs, for historical reasons located under

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 6 februari 2019 16:33 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] unix_primary_group = yes don t work > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:58:52 +0100 > L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > > > Hai

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, when I check ACLs on my sysvol I got the following errors: root at DKHHDC1:~# samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 12.10.2015 um 18:47 schrieb James: > On 10/12/2015 12:20 PM, Stefan Kania wrote: >> Hello, >> >> when I check ACLs on my sysvol I got the following errors: >> >> root at DKHHDC1:~# samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type >> 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element'

it would seem that the future ocfs2 (0.99.16>) builds will not support =< 2.6.12 kernels "out of the box" or am i missing something? 0.99.13 will build with a RHEL4 kernel, but later vers fail with the configure check on generic_drop_inode. the patch to fix it seems simple enough, however it seems that even if this was an rpm, youd have to rebuild your kernel before proceeding.