similar to: What's the solution? Multiple users accessing Samba fromterminal server

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "What's the solution? Multiple users accessing Samba fromterminal server"

2004 Nov 05
1
Configuration with Windows clients
Yes, until now it works well : I had written a mistake in the smb.conf ! Sorry Thanks a lot -----Message d'origine----- De : samba-bounces+albert.hervo=sydel.fr@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+albert.hervo=sydel.fr@lists.samba.org]De la part de Albert HERVO Envoy? : vendredi 5 novembre 2004 13:25 ? : Samba Objet : TR: [Samba] Configuration with Windows clients It doesn't
2004 Mar 30
0
What's the solution? Multiple users accessing Samba from terminal server
I've seen a lot of mention of this problem on this list, and via google, but no solutions that I can follow. Can somebody please clue me in? I have a terminal server, with multiple users, who need to access shares from a Samba server. The first user has no problem, but subsequent users fail, unless I first kill the smbd process. Important trivia (maybe): 1 - We did not have this
2006 Sep 22
1
ssh login through AD solution
Thanks to Anthony Ciarochi at Centeris for this solution. I have a Centos (Red Hat-based) server that is now accessible to AD users AND local users via ssh. I can control which AD groups can login using the syntax below. Red Hat-based distros use "pam_stack" in pam.d which is quite different than Debian's "include" based pam.d, cat /etc/pam.d/sshd #
2004 Apr 23
6
Windows 2003 Active Directory and Group Access
Hi together, we have a Windows 2003 Active Directory Server, working together with Samba Version 3.0.2a-Debian. It seems everything (Kerberos authentication and so on) works fine. All the authentication is done by the windows 2003 server. My problem is, that I can't connect to a share via a windows xp client, when the share has an option "valid user" which defines a group of the
2004 Mar 24
1
Stopping new directory creation ?
Hi, I've been looking for a way to stop users creating new sub-directories under a top level (shared) directory - which will need to contain 3 readymade directories and/or to stop users placing files outside the 3 readymade directories. Is this at all possible ? Got a really basic system - Slackware 8.0 and Samba 2.2.8a running purely as a fileserver for Win2k clients. Thanks Mike
2000 May 10
0
patche for samba-2.0.7/source/smbd/conn.c
Dear all, I have made patch for samba-2.0.7/source/smbd/conn.c This will, instead of using by-directional link, use array for managing connections. # The patch does seems to work on my RHL6.1Ja(fixed) version of # Linux machine. I don't know about other OS/Architecture. This should work better then original because: 1) The original code used bitmap.c for looking empty area. But using
1999 Nov 20
1
openssh and DOS
It appears that openssh has inherited the dos attack that ssh is susceptible to. This has been discussed on Bugtraq (see http://securityportal.com/list-archive/bugtraq/1999/Sep/0124.html for the thread). There does not appear to be an official for ssh. Attached below is a simple, proof of concept, patch that adds a MaxConnections to sshd_config that sets the maximum number of simultaneous
1999 Jan 29
0
MAX_OPEN_FILES - message & changeing
Nguyen Cao Dat asked about this: ERROR! Out of file structures - perhaps increase MAX_OPEN_FILES? As it happens I have started getting them too - on a PC Application server - the cause seems to be lots of files needed to be open to run applications - Lotus apps seems to be a particular culprit, but experiments indicate that even opening help on Microsoft Word opens 13 files! MAX_OPEN_FILES
2004 Feb 26
1
Samba CANNOT work with DNS round-robin (?)
This is posed as a question more that a statement, so if you can show that I'm wrong, please feel free to correct / flame me. A couple of years ago, I identified a file corruption issue caused by two people attempting to edit the same file via two different Samba servers. The file was in a shared file space, mounted on both Samba servers via NFS. The problem, I believe, lies in the fact
2009 Nov 15
3
Database postgresql not able to start
i have installed database POSTGRESQL for storing call details. when i restart database i get the error. [root at localhost server]# psql -h 127.0.0.1 -U asterisk Password psql: could not connect to server: Connection refused Is the server running on host "127.0.0.1" and accepting TCP/IP connections on port 5432? THIS IS MY /VAR/LIB/PGSQL/DATA/POSTGRESQL.CONF # CONNECTIONS AND
2000 Nov 21
0
Repost: PATCH: OpenSSH-2.3.0p1: specfile trivia
This doesn't appear to have made it to the list (although i still appear to be subscribed...). Bcc'ed to Damien for good measure. -- jim knoble | jmknoble at jmknoble.cx | http://www.jmknoble.cx/ -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Jim Knoble <jmknoble at jmknoble.cx> Subject: PATCH: OpenSSH-2.3.0p1: specfile trivia Date: Sun, 19 Nov
2003 Dec 03
0
Trivia Winners
Dear Valued Customers, Last evenings mailer went out to all of you. Half of you received it, and half of you received a blank email. We re-sent the email to all of you again this morning. So we have decided to have two winners, one for last evening and one for today's mailer. We are very sorry for the problems; the new mailing system isn't perfect. Trivia Question: What movie star
2006 Aug 02
0
Mysql too many connections
I wrote an email to the mailing list about this a couple of days ago. But I have new info and need some help. Basically in my background process I am creating new threads. Each thread get''s it''s own database connection. The problem is that when the thread is finished or killed it doesn''t close the connection. What mysql has is a wait_timeout variable. This is
2019 Aug 29
0
I broke "yum update" - C7
On Thursday 29 August 2019 16:20:00 Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Hi, > > yum uses libcurl behind the scenes and thus NSS and not OpenSSL. > > Do you get something indicative when running: > > URLGRABBER_DEBUG=1 yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=webtatic > check-update > > Alexander I get a lot of output for what looks like access to the local respos.d files all
2002 Nov 21
1
Out of connection structures
Hi, I still have the problem of "Out of connection structures" with Samba 2.2.6 or 2.2.7 and TSE clients. This problem was encountered by Richard van Beers : > From: richard van beers > To: jra@samba.org (Jeremy Allison), Gunther Hess > Subject: Re: Samba and Out Of Connection Structures from Terminal Servers (was on Solaris) > Cc:
2002 May 13
3
lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(349)
Windows 2000 sp2 with Terminal Services and Citrix 1.8 Metaframe as 'client'. --- Problem starts at 40 to 50 users logged on. 7-9 shares mapped at login. Effect is 'access denied' on accessing directories restricted by group access even though user has valid unix /etc/group access. --- Machine SunFire 880 Samba 2.2.4 Configured with "-without-winbind" Solaris 8
2006 Mar 02
2
[slightly-OT] postgresql 8.1.3 on intel OS X problems
Hi, Anybody have success with postgresql 8.1.3 on a new Intel OS X box? All hints welcome, please! I installed postgres 8.1.3 via darwinports, and everything is great until the initdb step. Initdb fails on shmget saying it couldn''t allocate enough memory (see below). So, I edited /etc/rc and increased kern.sysv.shmmax from 4194304 to 41943040 (4MB to 40MB) After reboot and
2005 Oct 12
2
DoS Attack
Yesterday, I had a DoS attack on a php/mysql webpage which uses a lot of resources. I have learned today, as a for instance, in the last hour, about 3000 requests for that page were made by 610 different servers, mostly from 'odd' places... China, Russia, Poland, Turkey... the usual suspects from my experience. The bottom line is this... I hit server loads of 142 yesterday!!! And the
2004 Jan 04
2
Samba 3 and Windows 2000 (SP4) Terminal Server
Hello, at this time we're using s. 2.2.8a (running on SuSE-Linux StandardServer 8 - Kernel 2.4.21) as fileserver for our terminal server environment. We ran into the 128 connections per client limitation and had to modify the MAX_CONNECTIONS-parameter in smbd/conn.c. Now we're planning the migration from s. 2.2.8a to s. 3.0.1. Is the modification in smbd/conn.c still necessary, when using
2003 May 03
0
Storing rsync secrets in LDAP
Hi, a few months ago I posted a message about using LDAP to store rsync secrets in LDAP. I received a response about patching the rsync source code with a patch file. I am now finally getting around to doing this, and when I tried to use the patch command 'patch --verbose ./rsync-2.5.6/authenticate.c rsync-ldap.patch' , it gives me the following error: Hmm... Looks like a unified diff