similar to: Problem while installing the SAMBA...

HI Samba Guru's We are installing Samba newly on our environment. We have lot of users existing in our enviromnt. We would like to give samba access to users. Do we have add each user or can we tell the samba to authenticate the users from /etc/passwd and password from /etc/shadow and what are the options if the users are in NIS. Please help Thanks Prasad.

Dear list, I'm using samba 3.0.2a on a RedHat Linux server. Samba is configured as being a PDC. When I use the usermanager from SRVTOOLS.EXE on my W2K workstation I don't see any groups listed in the window below the userlist. Also when I look at the properties of on of the user (who is member of more than one group) I only see that a primary group is assigned, the one in /etc/passwd. The

All, I am currently running Samba 3.0.2a on a RHEL3 server. I would like to use the extended file systems permissions through windows, but I haven't had much luck. Here is how I am set up.... My linux box is joined to my AD domain and appears to be functioning correctly. I also have winbind set up, and functioning, although I still have some tweaking to do, it is assigning user and

Hi, trying to install a package containing C code and requiring non-default configure argument settings the incantation (this has worked for R <= 2.8.1 on the same architectures) R CMD INSTALL --configure-args="--with-opt1 --with-opt2" packname does always result in a warning Warning: unknown option '--with-opt2' and consequently the option is ignored. Reverting the order

Hi I am trying to install Samba on a QNX 4.24 system. When we run the make file we get an error : compiling server.c make:cc:command not found make: *** [server.o] error 127 Can you help with this! Lucille Shears Systems Analyst CCG/DFO shearsl@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (709) 772-3131 cell (685-1512)

Dear all, I have a function that predicts DV based on one predictor pred: pred<-c(0,3000000,7800000,15600000,23400000,131200000) DV<-c(0,500,1000,1400,1700,1900) ## I define Function 1 that computes the predicted value based on pred values and parameters a and b: calc_DV_pred <- function(a,b) { DV_pred <- rep(0,(length(pred))) for(i in 1:length(DV_pred)){ DV_pred[i] <- a *

Hello, At the boot prompt ALLOWOPTIONS 0 is only applied to implicit kernels and not to labels. For configuration which want to allow selection, but prevent customization of the kernel command line, this behaviour is bad. Also the IMPLICIT 0 is applied to both the boot prompt and configuration setting (like DEFAULT); but one could argue that only the command supplied at the prompt make sense to

All, Thanks for the responses. There were two things I had to do to get this to work. The first thing was I had to change the readonly attribute in the smb.conf to NO. I also noticed that there was an error in my /etc/fstab so that the options were not read in for some reason. Once I fixed this and re-mounted the filesystem with the ACL option, I was able to do what I needed to do. Thanks

Dear llvm contributors, Could you please advise me how to skip checks, which are performed in AliasSet::aliasesUnknownInst, of unknown instructions from different alias sets of an alias set tracker that is a parameter of ‘AliasSetTracker::add(const AliasSetTracker &AST)’? If this wasn’t available at the moment and someone could review me, I would try to implement it. A temporary patch can be

Hi, Here are some numbers for my version -- also attached is the test code. I found that booting big machines is tediously slow so I lifted the whole lot to userspace. I measure the cycles spend in arch_spin_lock() + arch_spin_unlock(). The machines used are a 4 node (2 socket) AMD Interlagos, and a 2 node (2 socket) Intel Westmere-EP. AMD (ticket) AMD (qspinlock + pending + opt) Local:

Hi, Here are some numbers for my version -- also attached is the test code. I found that booting big machines is tediously slow so I lifted the whole lot to userspace. I measure the cycles spend in arch_spin_lock() + arch_spin_unlock(). The machines used are a 4 node (2 socket) AMD Interlagos, and a 2 node (2 socket) Intel Westmere-EP. AMD (ticket) AMD (qspinlock + pending + opt) Local:

Hi, does anybody know usage of parameter "time server = yes" ? Exactly, how can I utilize this function on my Windows clients ? Thanks M. Vancl

Hi, I have two users (one is me), connecting to the same directory tree on a Solaris box, for simplicity using smbclient for Samba 3.0.2a. In this tree, group permissions are set to rwx for a group that we are both in. I own some dirs, my colleague owns others. If I log in, I can put a file in any directory in the tree. If my colleague logs in, he can only write to directories that he owns.

> I'll be happy to answer any further questions you may have, feel free to e-mail > me directly (though right now our mail server is down) > The salient features that we want to have in the driver are: 1. llvm-ld will be used as "The Optimizer". 2. If the user has specified to generate the final executable, then llvm-ld should run on all the .bc files generated by clang

Dear all, I am doing few experiments to do understand optimization phase interactions. Here is a brief description of my experiements. 1. I picked the list of machine independent optimizations acting on llvm IR (those that are enabled at O3). 2. for each optimzation in the optimization-list a) Compiled the program using 'clang -c O0 -flto program.c' b) opt

Muchas gracias Jorge! Si la opción del loop con for ya la tenía implementada y me demora bastante por eso quería probar con apply o en este caso sapply, muchas gracias! Saludos!! F Macedo El 03/07/15 a las 23:09, Jorge I Velez escribió: > Hola Fernando, > > Podrias considerar las siguientes opciones: > > R2 <- vector("list", x) > for(i in 1:x){ > modelo

Dear List, First forgive me for my RTFM question yesterday about groups not appearing in the Windows usermanager (Karel Kulhav?, thanks for your reply). I did read the SAMBA HOWTO Collection but in a more 'vertical' way. This net groupmap thing must have passed my attention. I installed a prebuild version of Samba for redhat 8.0. Redhat however does not compile in ACL's in their

On 19 June 2011 14:44, Suresh Purini <suresh.purini at gmail.com> wrote: >  I am doing few experiments to do understand optimization phase > interactions. Here is a brief description of my experiements. > > 1. I picked the list of machine independent optimizations acting on > llvm IR (those that are enabled at O3). > 2.  for each optimzation in the optimization-list >  

Full_Name: Karsten Krug Version: 2.4.0 OS: Open Suse 10.0, Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (88.134.13.50) I found a problem in the 'optimise' function for one dimensional optimisation. Example 1: Try to find a maximum of the function below with the use of 'optimise' in the interval [0,0.5]. The function follows a parabola and has two local maxima located at the margins of

Hola Jorge. Usando sapply mejoró un poco pero no demasiado en realidad. Una vez lo estuve relojeando a mclapply (y otras funciones de ese paquete), pero no probé mas allá de algunos ejemplos. Voy a terminar este trabajo y lo pruebo, ya te contaré cuanto mejoró. Un abrazo y gracias nuevamente! El 5 de julio de 2015, 11:27, Jorge I Velez <jorgeivanvelez en gmail.com> escribió: > De