similar to: Permissions not recursive on win2K?

On 11 Aug 2005 at 14:40, samba@lists.samba.org wrote: > Way back on Mar 10 2004, I wrote this: > > ========== > Perhaps this is a known problem, and if so, hopefully it is fixed > in 3.x: > > Win2K SP4 clients, Samba 2.2.8a servers on Linux using ACL > support with > XFS filesystem (Redhat SGI-XFS build, and Mandrake 9.2). > > Adding/editing an ACL for

In the process of migrating file storage from NT to Samba servers, I am running into the following problem. I need a way to allow members of the group specified by file perms to change permissions on the file or dir. Here is the scenario: dir & files are owned by user (id 10634 in this case) group ownership is the nt group "domain admins" (id 10000) drwxrwx--- 4 10634

Are there plans to support logon time restrictions in Samba, or is it somehow supported already? We are using an NT4 PDC, and would like the samba servers to disconnect users outside of their logon times. Also, is there any way to allow one to change file ownership via samba? I have not found any way to do this. We would like domain admins to have this ability so that we can maintain file

We've encountered the following problem on our Redhat 7.2/XFS box running samba 2.2.3 with winbind and acl support. This week, some local accounts were created on the samba box for the installation of djb's dnscache. In addition, some NT domain accounts were also created on the NT4 PDC. The samba box is configured to use the NT4 domain for authentication; none of the local accounts

Hey all, I have a Windows 10 pro (64bit) long time running as a libvirt/KVM guest that I think Windows Update finally narfed. The hardware is a supermicro motherboard with dual Intel E5-2640 CPUs for a total of 40 threads and 64GB The guest is allocated 2sockets, 5cores, 2 threads and 32GB of RAM. (I've also tried 1 socket, 20 cores, 1 thread and 1s10c2t -- no help) In an SSH session to

If you can see the server, but not shares, you most likely have not published any directories. What version of the BE agent are you using? I've noticed 4.6 works well (the install actually works well and will walk you through the setup to publish the directories to be backed up). It's often easier to just publish root (but exclude /proc /tmp). Also, I've found out that in the hosts

Hi to all. I would to ask if there''s way in shorewall that I can be able to check my bandwidth, if im really getting what I paid for. Second, Is there a fast and effective way to implement traffic shaping with shorewall. Many thanks Jan --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now

hello, i'm a new suscriber of this mailing-list, hoping i'll be able to help u. But before i've a question. I've to mount a huge file server using Samba. We bought a new server, using raid 5 technology. My question is, now i've to install on it my favorite operating system :) and i ask me which filesystem type i've to use to increase Samba performances on it, some people

I'm building 3.0.14a on Mandrake 10.2, trying to use the same config as my other servers (3.0.11), but ACLs are not working. In checking the outout of smbd -b, I see this line is missing: System Headers: HAVE_SYS_ACL_H .... But I am specifying ./configure --with-acl-support ... Adding an acl using 'setfacl -m 'NTDOMAIN+NTUSER' file does successfully add an ACL for the NT

I'm sure there is a simple solution to this one... how do I make the printers share go away? I have no printers, and no [printers] section. I tried adding one, and making it browseable=no, but it still appears. This is on v 3.0.11 and 3.0.14a -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager Shawnigan Lake School http://www.sls.bc.ca swright@sls.bc.ca

We have encountered a number of problems with our firewall recently, and the past 24 hours have left me quite concerned. Here is what we are seeing: 1. Original firewall, a PentiumPro/200 with 96Mb RAM, serving approx 500 client PCs for a 10Mb internet connection. Running Mandrake 9.2, we began seeing severe swapping a few weeks, with kernel mem usage exceeding 200Mb. Given an ip_conntrack

Sorry for the frantic nature of this message, but we need to allow pings on our firewall so our ISP can test things. I''ve done this, and it still doesn''t work: (I am now at v.2.0.10) rules: AllowPing net fw AllowPing sls fw show indicates some matches, so where are they? Chain AllowPing (4 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source

A problem has arisen with the way samba handles file creation dates compared to NT/win2k, which prevents xcopy /d from working correctly. On NT/Win2k, files copied from another NT machine using xcopy end up with the modified dates equal to the original modified date of the file, and the created and accessed dates become the date of the xcopy operation. On Samba, files copied from an NT

Good day, gang, Chris McKeever was kind enough to write back to me over the weekend regarding the problems I'd experienced in using Backup Exec 8.x and 9.x to connect to Samba shares on a NetBSD system. Between his comments and my direct experience, I've only found ONE combination that will work, and that is: NetBSD 1.6, Samba 2.2.8a, and Backup Exec 8.6. If you take NetBSD up to 1.6.1,

In the panic of replacing our firewall(s) earlier in the week, we ended up moving our original shorewall 1.4 config onto a machine with 2.0.10 already installed, overwriting all the 2.0.10 config files. Most things seem to work fine, except for our masq entries. I''ve examined the default 2.0.10 files compared with our 1.4 files, and can''t spot the problem. What am I missing?

I *think* we are finally making some progress in tracking our elusive performance problems. After employing a second 10Mb link from our ISP, along with another firewall box and proxy, we were able to determine the problem *is* our firewall. We don''t know exactly why yet, but our sporadic slow web access seems to have gone away since swapping a new firewall in this morning. The

I''m re-reading the section on dns names in the shorewall docs: "I personally recommend strongly against using DNS names in Shorewall configuration files. If you use DNS names and you are called out of bed at 2:00AM because Shorewall won''t start as a result of DNS problems then don''t say that you were not forewarned." Having been stung by this a few times

Ok, I''ve flogged this issue probably longer than some of you can stand by now. (remember, I''m the nut trying to use a PPro200 to support ~500 users on a 10Mb internet link :o) To appease those who think I''m nuts, I am ordering a new firewall shortly to allow for future growth. (probably a Dell PE750 with P4/2.8 and dual GE nics.) However, since I have yet to prove

Hello, I am stumped on a problem I am having with Shorewall 2.0.1 on Mandrake 10. My setup is as follows. I have a /28 and have assiigned all ip addresses to my firewall using aliases. I am able to setup rules to allow specific traffic to specfic ip addresses on the firewall like so: ACCEPT net:w.x.y.z $FW:w.x.y.z tcp 22 This works great for TCP and UDP traffic. I can

We are seeing the following in our logs: Nov 25 16:21:41 fw kernel: martian source 139.142.66.253 from 10.0.0.199, on dev eth0 Nov 25 16:21:41 fw kernel: ll header: 00:a0:c9:60:0e:b2:00:02:7e:21:0e:dc:08:00 00:a0:c9:60:0e:b2 is the mac of our firewall interface on IP 139.142.66.253. 00:02:7e:21:0e:dc is the mac of our Cisco router on IP 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.199 is a Cisco switch - we have about