similar to: warning

Hai, Im missing at least one of these on the PC. Primary Dns Suffix  . . . . . . . :  DNS suffix search list       : Are you using DHCP server or static ips on the pc. Thats where this problem is, i dont think its the server (samba) setup. @Rowland, > smbclient -L localhost -U% -d3 Wont work, due to bug in smbclient thats tries smb1 first ( or something like that ) I suggest test like

Hi.. Guess this is asked alot, looked through the last 1000 posts but couldnt find anything so here goes =) Running a 10 finger training program originally made for win 95 on wine, and it all runs smoothly except that i cant get it to show the danish characters "???", if i press the keys on the keyboard they work fine so its not the keymapping thats wrong.. It just replaces the

Hello, I'm using a WIndows Server 2016 as a DC and Samba 4.5 (Debian Stretch) as a fileserver. The fileserver is made with Windows ACLs (exactly like the Samba tutorial). The Windows 10 Client cannot copy these 4 files: C:\Users\testuser\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\UPPS\UPPS.bin -> UNC\FS\profiles\testuser.V6\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\UPPS\UPPS.bin

Hai, Thats a setup i really dont advice. Should work, but expect problems. You can happy run both in VMs. Can you explain maybe why your setting up like this, so we can maybe help you to get a better setup? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Stefan G. > Weichinger via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 14

Hai Marco, > > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > Sofar, until tomorrow, > > Done some tests, metoo. > > 1) seems that nfs-common is disabled 'by design'. Looking at debian > changelog: > > nfs-utils (1:1.2.8-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium > > Partial sync from ubuntu, included changes: > >

hi, can you post a ipconfig /all from the windows pc also. a quick look at the server config looks ok to me. and does smbclient -L $(hostname -f) -U% -m smb2 work. greetz, Louis > Op 9 aug. 2017 om 17:23 heeft Vladimir Frelikh via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > > Sorry forgot to mention samba version and build options: > > samba -b >

Package: xen-api Version: 1.3.2-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n patch Greetings, -- Camale?n -------------- next part -------------- # xen-api po-debconf translation to Spanish # Copyright (C) 2010 Software in the Public Interest # This file is distributed under the same license as the xen-api package. # # Changes: # - Initial translation # Camale?n <noelamac at gmail.com>, 2012 # # -

I am getting the following on my 'new box' for my DNS server: Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:58:04 -0500 From: To: Subject: [abrt] full crash report User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 abrt_version: 2.0.8 cmdline: ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_onlo3-root_01 rd_NO_LUKS rd_LVM_LV=vg_onlo3/root_01 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 +rd_NO_MD SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us

Am 21.02.19 um 15:49 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Or... > > Set the creator group option. > > [Daten] > comment = Daten > create mask = 3660 > directory mask = 3770 did so, they test now. thanks

Good morning Stefan, Hmm, yes, i notice some things also with the debian 9.8 upgrade, that killed my kopano server. Was a long night yesterday. :-( but fixed. Ive done all my servers here and no samba problems. I do know of more problems with docker. There is a small difference, i dont know exact were, but i detected that on the kopano forum. Kopano builds it packages within docker, the

The proxy already is into domain "wbinfo -u" returns all users from the AD, the kinit command with -t /etc/squid/PROXY.keytab is working great, but the NTLM phase into the squid log is the same ERROR: Negotiate Authentication validating user. Result: {result=BH, notes={message: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL * NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL; }} are in recent versions some changes about the NTLM or NT

Hai Stefan, How are you telling its outdated? And dont delete it if you would re-created it. Move it away/backup it. But this would help you. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Keytab_Extraction Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 27 februari

My ldaptest.php works now. Can't tell the "missing link" so far ... but it seems it's connect via ldaps now (and reading users etc)

On 11/05/2020 15:24, L. van Belle via samba wrote: > For all Debian 10 people and strange things after upgrade of debian. > > > apt remove apparmor > > Next debian upgrade use : apt dist-upgrade --no-install-recomends > That wont install apparmor. Ah, now I think about it, this came up on the Devuan mailing list, Debian seems to have gone mad and now installs every

I have given the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege on the domain member but it did not help. The connection warning persists when I click on the "Shared Folders" + shared. It says to check network path, firewall rules. dismissing the window takes me to the domain member and shared folder can be selected and viewed. An attempt to modify and pressing "apply" results in another warning that

Hi! Samba server set up for domain rufus.ada.de a proxy is reachable in proxy.ada.de. resolv.conf is configured to be: domain rufus.ada.de. search rufus.ada.de. miri.ada.de. ada.de. nameserver 127.0.0.1 Internal servers are handled (by an external DNS, our internal samba DNS forwards to): # host proxy.ada.de proxy.ada.de has address 10.169.16.3 For deb.debian.org: # host deb.debian.org

Hello, Can anyone help with the output shown below? It?s running on RH9, recent CVS of Asterisk and with one X100P card (2 channels), a budget tone 102 and Xlite softphone. CLI> -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1' Jul 7 18:42:24 WARNING[1192437440]: pbx.c:1836 ast_pbx_run: Channel 'Zap/1-1' sent into invalid extension 's' in context 'default', but no

On 2/25/2019 3:36 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai Marco, > > For you own domains, dont point postfix to your internal DNS only, > if done wrong you might miss dns info on the wan side and thats mostlikely your error . Likely. Here is the error (ignore the ip's - messed them up for this response): Feb 25 16:22:10 sce252 postfix/smtp[3114]: 0D1E86E3A6D: to=<marco

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 6 maart 2020 16:16 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] DCs from 4.10.x to 4.11.x > > On 06/03/2020 10:44, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > > Am 06.03.20 um 10:46 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via

Hai Elias, 聽 Sorry for the late reply. I do preffer the list, and i understand why you mailt my directly, but best is to keep this on the list. The more eye that see this, the more chance you have on a reply. I must say, i personaly dont use any trust relations ships. that was long ago when i used that, so im bit rusty here. 聽 Now, i see you are using my 4.8.2 packages. so you on debian. *( or