similar to: Signatures in Samba with windows XP

On Tue Feb 17 11:14:15 GMT 2004, Andrew Bartlett wrote: >> Any suggestions for things to try (or even a guaranteed solution ;-) ) would >> be very much appreciated. >> server signing = no >Try this as yes. How did you get it work? I've tried the "server signing = yes or auto", but it didn't work. Could you kindly tell us how to set the XP to get it

Hi, We are migrating from Unix Server to Linux, so the ASU (Advanced Server for Unix) will be replaced by Samba. The pwdump for Nt is pretty for Windows NT, but I don't know if there is an Unix dump tool to transfer the ASU SAM database to the Samba's smbpasswd file. Any help is welcomed! Thanks in advance, Jianliang Lu Tiesse S.P.A. Via Jervis, 60 10015 Ivrea (TO) Italy Email:

Hi, I've compiled the SAMBA 3.0 alpha18 with all default options and installed well. Then I would join my NT 4.0 machine using the following steps (manual, not On the fly): # useradd -g groupid -d /dev/null -c "comment" -s /bin/false -m machine_name$ # passwd -l machine_name$ # smbpasswd -a -m machine_name$ after that I tried to join my NT4.0 to the Samba PDC, but it failed

I''m beginning to believe that the use of the last column in the rules file to designate redirection/forwarding is too subtle for many users. For 1.3, I think I''ll do something like the following: Current rule: ACCEPT net loc:192.168.1.3 tcp 80 - all New rule: FORWARD net loc:192.168.1.3 tcp 80 Current rule: ACCEPT net fw::3128 tcp 80 - all New rule: REDIRECT net

The rule: ACCEPT loc $FW::3128 tcp www doesn''t work propertly, the http access does not redirect to squid but directly exit. what''s wrong? Thanks ------- Dario Lesca (d.lesca@ivrea.osra.it) -------------------------------------- @@@@@@@ this is my shorewall-1.2.13 config: #[/etc/shorewall/common.def]-----------------------------------------------

Hi, I'n using the nautilus file browser in a GNOME desktop environment on a FC2 system. If I enter smb:/// in the location bar in nautilus I can see the network but whenever I try to look at the shares on a computer I get a message saying that I do not have permissions to view the contents. I looked in the archives and found a thread on a similar problem. This thread mentioned that

Hi Donovan, Thank you for the insight. I will keep you posted on this. Best Regards Naveen A. >From: Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> >To: Naveen Athresh <naveenathresh@hotmail.com> >CC: rsync@samba.org,librsync developers list ><librsync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >Subject: Re: rsync - windows how should I compile the code any clues >-Thanks

Hi, on a system RedHat 8.0, only on this, not on other various RedHat8.0, I have see the follow strange error in /var/log/{messages,boot.log} ..... After the boot all it seems to work, the modules is loads.... I have already tried to install other versions of kernel but the problem is always the same one :-(( Someone has some idea of what is happening? Thanks... Dario Lesca

Hi, I tried to upgrade samba on a Linux from 2.2.8a to 3.0.0, and after the upgrade the printer sharing fails. I would like to participate in the search for the bug (if it is a bug), but I don't know how to start. If this is not a bug I would like to know why not, and how to work around, that the printer does not work with the attached smb.conf, while it works with samba version 2.2.8a

Warning .... The two interface samples contain samples of the three interface... [root@multilinux temp]# tar xvfz samples-1.4.4/two-interfaces.tgz three-interfaces/ three-interfaces/interfaces three-interfaces/routestopped three-interfaces/masq three-interfaces/policy three-interfaces/rules three-interfaces/zones ------- Dario Lesca (d.lesca@ivrea.osra.it)

Hi, I'm using SAMBA 3.0 alpha19 to try the trust relationship between an NT 4.0 domain and the samba domain. The command I used was "net rpc trusdom", but it did'nt work, also the other "net" commands worked bad ( Segmentation Fault or return -1 ecc.). Could you kindly to tell me how to do to set the trust relationship with the SAMBA 3.0, or if there is any docs for

On 09/08/2016 05:10 PM, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 04:59:14PM +0200, David Komanek via samba wrote: >> and there is nothing logged by pam libraries, so I suppose they are not >> called at all (other services are using it successfully and logging >> without problems). But as long as I am using plaintext passwords, it >> should be going to pam

Hi, I've been using dovecot 0.99.14 for a few years, with libpam-ldap and libnss-ldap, and never experienced any problem with those. I expect to soon switch to dovecot 1.0rc15 (or whatever gets available in Debian Etch, hopefuly dovecot 1.0), but I've seen some warnings against dovecot+libnss-ldap... Is the problem with libnss-ldap a recent problem (I mean it was not a problem with older

On Friday 11 of November 2016, Felipe Gasper wrote: > Hello, > > We?re rolling out large SNI deployments for our mail servers. Each domain > gets an entry like this in the config: > > local_name mail.foo.com { > ssl_cert = </ssl/domain_tls/*.foo.com/combined > ssl_key = </ssl/domain_tls/*.foo.com/combined > } Lack of glob/regexp support here is also a

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:25:44PM +0200, David Komanek wrote: > obey pam restrictions (G) > > When Samba 3.0 is configured to enable PAM support (i.e. > --with-pam), this parameter will control whether or not Samba should > obey PAM's account and session management directives. > The default behavior is to use PAM for clear text > authentication only

There is OBVIOUSLY something wrong somewhere. EITHER a WHOLE bunch of us are stupider than we thought, the documentation left off a step, or there is something SO blatently obvious that we are ALL staring it in the face and missing it inches in front of our faces. This is exactly what I've had, (BUT I *D*I*D* have it running ok ...) and I STILL havent figured it out yet,... Subject:

> On November 11, 2016 at 12:22 PM Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz <arekm at maven.pl> wrote: > > > On Friday 11 of November 2016, Felipe Gasper wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We?re rolling out large SNI deployments for our mail servers. Each domain > > gets an entry like this in the config: > > > > local_name mail.foo.com { > > ssl_cert =

Hi list, I''m sorry to come here talking about this (since I realize you have many, far better things to do, but I''d really like your feedback on an idea I have for the summer of code. I''d like to work with the guys at Ruby Central on implementing a feature for Ruby on Rails, and since you guys are the best source of information on the subject, I''d like to ask

Although I've installed samba-common, -server, -doc version 2.2.7a (from the Mandrake 9 distribution), thr -doc RPM is broken since it actually didn't install any of the files it claimed it would. No problem, I thought, I'll just read it online. Except for some reason, in his/her infinite wisdom, your webmaster has apparently decided not to put most of your documentation on your

Hi all, I've done a brief search of the list archieves and cannot find any solutions to this problem, so I'll post my story and hopefuly someone will have a better answer. Brief Description: This problem has now occured with a number of users, running different versions of Office (see below). When saving documents, Office seems to set the read-only bit. The problem is best shown with