similar to: smbclient sends "Password: 00"

When trying to access a disk share (on a VMware Win2K machine) that shows up fine with smbclient -L (version 2.2.8a on Gentoo), I get a "tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED" error. Examining the TCP stream with Ethereal (see excerpts below) revealed that the initial login went fine, with password sent and accepted. However, a second authentication exchange, apparently for

I need to distribute rsync (useable for both client and --daemon) on Win32. Distributing cygwin1.dll is, well you know, a bad idea. I took a shot at building under MingW but ran into an ugly looking error: > checking for socklen_t... no > checking for socklen_t equivalent... configure: error: Cannot find a > type to use in place of socklen_t I will pay $50 for a MingW build of latest

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I thought some people might need to know about this (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=815): Summary : NT4.0 client can not map drives on a ~ 3.0 (cleartext) standalone server - ------- Comment #4 From Gerald (Jerry) Carter 2003-12-10 13:48 This is an NT4 bug when talking to unicode enabled servers. Notice the password length

Good day time! We've noticed the following issue with Samba 3.0.1 on Linux. When SMB client asks for the first time on FID for a locking or read request on an opened file, it causes an ACK to be sent from client side. Windows server also requests ACK BUT much more rarely. Sending ACK causes additional overhead when working in heavy locking and unlocking environment. Windows server

Good day time! We've noticed the following issue with Samba 3.0.1 on Linux. When SMB client asks for the first time on FID for a locking or read request on an opened file, it causes an ACK to be sent from client side. Windows server also requests ACK BUT much more rarely. Sending ACK causes additional overhead when working in heavy locking and unlocking environment. Windows server

Here is a second, somewhat related question to my last one. When looking over the network trace I have ran into something I cannot explain. It may be quite proper, in which case I am misreading the trace. But I would appreciate it if someone would explain this to me. In packet 109 of the trace (during a login with no profile on the server), I see a "NT Create AndX request"

Hello, I replaced an NT4 server by a Samba 3.0.14a ldap server following the instructions in 'Samba by example'. Everything works fine except for some files on a W2003 SP2 server: - when the W2003 server uses the Linux PDC, from a WinXP client, some files are not writable, and ACLs can be listed but not changed. - when the NT4 server is up, the same files on the W2003 server can be

I think I've found out why MacOS 10.5.x (Leopard) clients are unable to connect to Samba shares when authenticating with Kerberos. Basically, the Leopard Macs insert a few extra bytes (Padding and reqFlags, according to wireshark) into the security blob within the Session Setup AndX Request packet, bytes whose start tag is 0xa1, in a spot where Samba's parser expects 0xa2. The critical

Gentoo bundles flac 1.2.1 with numerous patches applied. Some of these patches are already included in upstream flac-dev (for example the gcc 4.3 cstring issue). Below are the patches supplied by Gentoo (merged against MASTER) and with the Changelog explanations of them as well as the discussion link surrounding the patch: *flac-9999-asm.patch:* *28 Sep 2007; Samuli Suominen <drac at

I'm trying to use a Samba (3.0.37) share on my ASUS RT-ac66R router as a destination for scans from my Kodak Office Hero 6.1 all-in-one printer. I'm currently getting an invalid User ID or Password error message. I have been unable to increase the Samba log level at all even after editing the log level in smb.conf. Before an old router running DDWRT (including Samba) failed, scanning to

Hi Jaren, Sorry for the delat dealing with these patches. Jaren Stangret wrote: > Below are the patches supplied by Gentoo (merged against MASTER) and with > the Changelog explanations of them as well as the discussion link > surrounding the patch: Unfortunately the Gentoo changelog explanations are a little lacking and very Gentoo specific. > > *flac-9999-asm.patch:* > *28

Hello, I got an 'Invalid argument' error when trying to scp a file, with non-ascii characters in its name, from Linux (ISO 8859-15) to OS X (UTF-8). So I made a patch for scp that adds two option flags: -I: local side uses UTF-8 and remote side uses ISO 8859-15 -U: local side uses ISO 8859-15 and remote side uses UTF-8 and converts the filenames on-the-fly. Maybe it would be useful for

About a year and a half ago, someone answered a request on how to set up rsync so that the encryption was automatically setup (wish I knew more about the technical aspects). It has been in use for the time since then and it has been great. Now I have to replace the destination computer and setting up, what I call the encryption part, is the part I have forgotten how to do. This is the

Hi, We're doing some of performance tests with Linux Samba v3. We're comparing WinXP/Win2k clients vs OS2 clients accessing a samba server. For one test, we're coping 10.000 small files. Let's say, we run the command copy \\sambaserver\10000files\*.* c:\data\10000files With an OS2 client it takes 23 seconds to complete. With an Windows client it takes 460 seconds to complete.

Hi, We're doing some of performance tests with Linux Samba v3. We're comparing WinXP/Win2k clients vs OS2 clients accessing a samba server. For one test, we're coping 10.000 small files. Let's say, we run the command copy \\sambaserver\10000files\*.* c:\data\10000files With an OS2 client it takes 23 seconds to complete. With an Windows client it takes 460 seconds to complete.

Samba 3.0.28a-0.fc8 & Windows XP. When logging on to machine 'A' one of my users gets an "Access Denied" message for a particular cookie file -- 'statse'. When logging on to another machine ('B'), there is no problem. I have tried, when logged in as administrator (mapped to root on the server), to read the cookie file on both machines. Machine 'A'

Recently I had the chance to look at smb service response times over OpenVPN using Wireshark/TShark. Here are 2 samples. In both samples a Win XP Pro machine is connecting to a server running samba-3.3.7 and openvpn-2.0.6_9 on FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE. Location #1 =================================================================== SMB RTT Statistics: Filter: Commands Calls Min

Hi, I'm trying to replace a windows fileserver server with a Fedora Core 2 samba server in our Windows 2000 ADS domain. A performance problem occurs when accessing certain samba shares from Windows Explorer on either an Windows XP or a W2K client machine. It can take up to a minute for explorer to list files in a share folder containing only a few files! It eventually does, but but reports

I tried to close everything I had open and filter as best as I could.. but left random lines in just in case it helps. 172.16.5.230 is my local machine and *.33.235 is the server. This is a slow save.. 13:48:39.852340 (60) 001F5B35DB28 Broadcast UDP - Other Ports 172.16.5.93 172.16.5.255 00:04:53.922946 293.922946 13:48:39.852605 (60) 001F5B35DB28 USC-IANA

After upgrading XP to SP2, I can no longer connect to server aliases. The client reports an error 53, "The network path was not found", when doing "net use * \\prof\profile. Mapping to a share on the real netbios name works fine. Anyone else seen this? Setup: samba-3.0.6.rc2 smb.conf [global] netbios aliases = PROF include = /etc/samba/smb.%L smb.prof [profile] path =