similar to: tree connect

Sorry about the duplicate post, but the poor subject line of the previous one may be why I didn't get any replies. When trying to access a disk share (on a VMware Win2K machine) that shows up fine with smbclient -L (version 2.2.8a on Gentoo), I get a "tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED" error. Examining the TCP stream with Ethereal (see excerpts below) revealed that the

Here is a second, somewhat related question to my last one. When looking over the network trace I have ran into something I cannot explain. It may be quite proper, in which case I am misreading the trace. But I would appreciate it if someone would explain this to me. In packet 109 of the trace (during a login with no profile on the server), I see a "NT Create AndX request"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I thought some people might need to know about this (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=815): Summary : NT4.0 client can not map drives on a ~ 3.0 (cleartext) standalone server - ------- Comment #4 From Gerald (Jerry) Carter 2003-12-10 13:48 This is an NT4 bug when talking to unicode enabled servers. Notice the password length

Hello, I replaced an NT4 server by a Samba 3.0.14a ldap server following the instructions in 'Samba by example'. Everything works fine except for some files on a W2003 SP2 server: - when the W2003 server uses the Linux PDC, from a WinXP client, some files are not writable, and ACLs can be listed but not changed. - when the NT4 server is up, the same files on the W2003 server can be

Good day time! We've noticed the following issue with Samba 3.0.1 on Linux. When SMB client asks for the first time on FID for a locking or read request on an opened file, it causes an ACK to be sent from client side. Windows server also requests ACK BUT much more rarely. Sending ACK causes additional overhead when working in heavy locking and unlocking environment. Windows server

Good day time! We've noticed the following issue with Samba 3.0.1 on Linux. When SMB client asks for the first time on FID for a locking or read request on an opened file, it causes an ACK to be sent from client side. Windows server also requests ACK BUT much more rarely. Sending ACK causes additional overhead when working in heavy locking and unlocking environment. Windows server

I think I've found out why MacOS 10.5.x (Leopard) clients are unable to connect to Samba shares when authenticating with Kerberos. Basically, the Leopard Macs insert a few extra bytes (Padding and reqFlags, according to wireshark) into the security blob within the Session Setup AndX Request packet, bytes whose start tag is 0xa1, in a spot where Samba's parser expects 0xa2. The critical

I need to distribute rsync (useable for both client and --daemon) on Win32. Distributing cygwin1.dll is, well you know, a bad idea. I took a shot at building under MingW but ran into an ugly looking error: > checking for socklen_t... no > checking for socklen_t equivalent... configure: error: Cannot find a > type to use in place of socklen_t I will pay $50 for a MingW build of latest

Client is a centos-3.4 box, Server (DC) is Windows 2K AD. I'm able to see user and group accounts on the DC but not able to authenticate against it. wbinfo -a does not rely on pam module, correct? [root@linux04 root]# net ads testjoin Join is OK [root@linux04 root]# net ads info LDAP server: 172.16.100.202 LDAP server name: p69ms101 Realm: PORTSEATTLE.ORG Bind Path: dc=PORTSEATTLE,dc=ORG

I'm trying to use a Samba (3.0.37) share on my ASUS RT-ac66R router as a destination for scans from my Kodak Office Hero 6.1 all-in-one printer. I'm currently getting an invalid User ID or Password error message. I have been unable to increase the Samba log level at all even after editing the log level in smb.conf. Before an old router running DDWRT (including Samba) failed, scanning to

Samba 3.0.28a-0.fc8 & Windows XP. When logging on to machine 'A' one of my users gets an "Access Denied" message for a particular cookie file -- 'statse'. When logging on to another machine ('B'), there is no problem. I have tried, when logged in as administrator (mapped to root on the server), to read the cookie file on both machines. Machine 'A'

Hello, I have my samba share running and I can access everything just fine from my windows XP work station. However I have a problem with macromedia homesite. I can see but not open the share because homesite thinks I do not have access. I have captured the network traffic with a sniffer and it seems the path is a problem.. Here is a snip of my network traffic where 192.168.0.9 is my linux

Background: This situation is using Rational ClearCase in a situation with server on Solaris 10 and clients on a mixture of Windows XP and Windows 7, with access to the VOB (repository) enabled via Samba version: 3.4.9 Users are getting a consistent error with a specific ClearCase operation (Add to Source Control), which we have traced to a Samba interaction. The issue: For the interaction

Sorry if this is a stupid question but I tried reading, studying and finding solution but am not making it alone :) On my home lan I have a Linux (Debian sid) box (192.168.174.244) running 3.0.10 samba and cups 1.1.23. My objective is to print from this box to the other home PC which is running XP (192.168.174.242) and sharing an Epson R200 printer. Follows the troubleshooting I could do

Hello Samba group, Problem: I cannot get samba share to grant access to my /shared share. I created it, gave the linux user permissions and tested them, my Windows XP Pro sees the share, I can map a drive to it, but I cannot change to it: Access denied is the error I get. I'm logged into Windows XP as the same user ID and password as on the Linux system. I had a problem when accessing the

Gentoo bundles flac 1.2.1 with numerous patches applied. Some of these patches are already included in upstream flac-dev (for example the gcc 4.3 cstring issue). Below are the patches supplied by Gentoo (merged against MASTER) and with the Changelog explanations of them as well as the discussion link surrounding the patch: *flac-9999-asm.patch:* *28 Sep 2007; Samuli Suominen <drac at

Hi, We're doing some of performance tests with Linux Samba v3. We're comparing WinXP/Win2k clients vs OS2 clients accessing a samba server. For one test, we're coping 10.000 small files. Let's say, we run the command copy \\sambaserver\10000files\*.* c:\data\10000files With an OS2 client it takes 23 seconds to complete. With an Windows client it takes 460 seconds to complete.

Hi, We're doing some of performance tests with Linux Samba v3. We're comparing WinXP/Win2k clients vs OS2 clients accessing a samba server. For one test, we're coping 10.000 small files. Let's say, we run the command copy \\sambaserver\10000files\*.* c:\data\10000files With an OS2 client it takes 23 seconds to complete. With an Windows client it takes 460 seconds to complete.

Hi Jaren, Sorry for the delat dealing with these patches. Jaren Stangret wrote: > Below are the patches supplied by Gentoo (merged against MASTER) and with > the Changelog explanations of them as well as the discussion link > surrounding the patch: Unfortunately the Gentoo changelog explanations are a little lacking and very Gentoo specific. > > *flac-9999-asm.patch:* > *28

After migrating a particular W2K file service to Samba 3.0.21c on SuSE 9.3 Pro (a DMS with winbindd against a W2K3 ADS), the W2K clients are suffering performance issues (in a switched LAN). Looking at the traffic with Ethereal (latest SVN), it looks like the client writes the data in *1 byte* pieces likes this (c=client, s=server): c->s NT Create AndX Request c<-s NT Create AndX