similar to: Samba 3.0.1a Cannot Browse Server

Well, the log shows that I'm getting an Access Denied on the SAMR_OPEN_DOMAIN rpc... does that point anyone to my problem? 2004/02/17 09:36:47, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1509) api_rpcTNP: rpc command: SAMR_OPEN_DOMAIN [2004/02/17 09:36:47, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(251) [2004/02/17 09:36:47, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(252) se_access_check: user sid is

is turned on. Can anybody kind to confirm with me? Our network is using a mix of Win2k server, Win2k Pro, Win98, Win95 and WinMe machines, where the Win2k server is the domain controller and terminal service applications server and the Samba is a member fileserver of the domain. All workstations logon and mount the samba file services. We'd like to check if the problem could be solved by

connect to it - wait about 2 minutes and then get 'network is busy' message. I suspect that my problems may lie somewhere in the multiple domains / subnetting areas, but I can't see where. Any comments will be welcome. TIA Harry Burgin Return-Path: <marion.haines@countygovt.brevard.fl.us> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from gc2a-hplh4.countygovt.brevard.fl.us

Hi Dmitry, On 01/09/2013 03:48 PM, Dmitry Mikushin wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > This kind of analysis is a pretty complex problem in general case. > Consider, for instance, function "f" has nested calls of other functions > with "side effects", meaning they could potentially change the contents of > "in" or "out" indirectly. For this

It looks like I missed that email completely, I started out replying to Nikola and Hans which is why I was talking about Windows rather than OS X. I've just found your first email in my llvmdev folder and I think I see what happened. My mail rules deliver llvmdev messages to a folder named llvmdev unless I'm directly addressed in which case it delivers to my inbox. It looks like you

Are you analysing sizes in order to perform host<->accelerator memory synchronization? 2013/1/9 Sebastian Dreßler <dressler at zib.de> > Hi Dmitry, > > On 01/09/2013 03:48 PM, Dmitry Mikushin wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > This kind of analysis is a pretty complex problem in general case. > > Consider, for instance, function "f" has nested

Yeah, I was just puzzled :D No worries. Cheers, Sebastian 2014-12-16 11:09 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>: > It looks like I missed that email completely, I started out replying to > Nikola and Hans which is why I was talking about Windows rather than OS X. > > > > I've just found your first email in my llvmdev folder and I think I see what

Hello everyone ! I followed http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4976298/modern-equivalent-of-llvm-annotationmanagerin order to get annotations from my target bytecode. All the examples that I give in the following is related to the code from that link. I have `__attribute__((annotate("DS"))) int f=0;` into the target C++ program and the related IR code: @.str = private unnamed_addr

why the install is failing. Do in need to rpm -e on all the 2.07 packages??? Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de [212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B884C4278 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 22:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from

Hi, I solved it. From the ConstantStruct you can call getOperand() multiple times, so "mine" as deep as you can. On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu < alexandruionutdiaconescu at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > Thanks for the response. > > I already did this : > > I cast the entire annotated expression to Value*. Then, in

Do you know some program which process icecast log and make some nice graphs similar to webalizer's. Thanks, Madr -- Martin Dressler e-mail: dr@musicabona.cz http://www.musicabona.com/ --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org'

Hello, On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 19:15:27 +0100 Sebastian Dreßler <dressler at zib.de> wrote: [] > For a project involving a tree data structure, we created a graph for > representing IR for further analysis. I attached an excerpt of such a > graph to give you an idea. If it helps, we will see how to proceed ;) Well, after grepping LLVM source for apparent lack of it and googling for

I will get a smbd process started. (If this is incorrect please let me know ;) But this morning I did a quick ps -ax on my machine and found *two* smbd -D in the process list. But as far as I know there is no connection to the samba server right now. I did connect to and disconnect from the server yesterday but I would think that that connection would have been released by now. Can anyone

Hi, suppose the following C function declaration: void f(int *in, int *out); Now further suppose, that _in_ is an array only read from and _out_ is an array that is only written to. Based on this, I was wondering whether there is some already existing LLVM pass (or maybe a part of a pass) that detects those "data directions" for pointers. I'm not quite sure whether e.g. Alias

Hi Sebastian, Thanks for the response. I already did this : I cast the entire annotated expression to Value*. Then, in order to avoid ugly things like getAsString(), I check if V->getValueID() == Value::ConstantArrayVal in order to cast it to ConstantArray. Because it contains only array[0], I cast array0>getOperand(0) to ConstantStruct. Therefore, from ConstantStruct you can get all the

Hi Sebastian, Sure! The bulk of LMDA was written by Aparna Kotha (CCd). It computes dependences between all instructions, computes the resulting direction vectors in the function, then associates them all with loops. At a high level, the dependence analysis consults with AliasAnalysis, and ScalarEvolution before resorting to attempting to understand the effective affine expressions and

> On 15.12.2014, at 15:45, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf Of Sebastian Dreßler >> Sent: 15 December 2014 14:08 >> Cc: Ben Pope; Nikola Smiljanic; llvmdev >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase

----------------- Hello, I want to do a memory dependence profiling. Is there any freely available implementation of memory dependence profiling implementations in LLVM which I can modify for my own use? Unnikrishnan C -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Hi Sebastian, This kind of analysis is a pretty complex problem in general case. Consider, for instance, function "f" has nested calls of other functions with "side effects", meaning they could potentially change the contents of "in" or "out" indirectly. For this reason, even current state-of-art commercial APIs that imply strong data analysis (like OpenACC

Hi Paul, On 02/24/2013 08:54 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 19:15:27 +0100 > Sebastian Dreßler <dressler at zib.de> wrote: > > [] > >> For a project involving a tree data structure, we created a graph for >> representing IR for further analysis. I attached an excerpt of such a >> graph to give you an idea. If it helps,