similar to: AD Primary Group Masked by Local Primary Group

leon@eatworms.swmed.edu wrote: > > I ran into a bug in samba-2.0.6: an infinite loop caused by two-level > getgrent calls. validate_group, in the middle of a getgrent loop, may > indirectly call user_in_group_list, which resets getgrent. As a result, > validate_group never exits. The attached patch works around this. It's a > quick and dirty patch which I'm including

Hi, I'm currently using v3.0.24 in production and all works well. I'm testing 3.0.25 to see if I'm going to have any problems with it if I have to upgrade. I have a problem with the "force group" setting if it is set to a local Unix group. This same setting works fine in 3.0.24 but I'm denied access to the same share in 3.0.25. If I comment off the "force

I have vsftp chrooted so that users can only come into their home directory. I have a few virtual hosts. I have the websites in the home directory of the intial user for each site. So the sites look like this. /home/user1/html /home/user2/html Using vsftp, I have set the default to chroot a user to their home directory. So user1 ftping in whill go right to his directory and not be able to go

Hi! I'm using Samba in an AD setup, (version 4.2.0) and I'm looking for a way to change the password of a user from the command line, as a non-root user. I know I can use 'smbpasswd', 'samba-tool user setpassword', or 'samba-tool user password', but these all seem to require root privileges. When I run them as root, they work, but when I run them as non-root

Dear All, I have implemented samba to right now in test environment to be implemented in production as? samba file server so far its working grt but I have one issue i have right now one share and want only the users who have access to the share to see it and the others should not when I log into the user who has no access I see the share and when i double click it ask me for username and

Hi Roel, > I'm using Samba in an AD setup, (version 4.2.0) and I'm looking for a > way to change the password of a user from the command line, as a > non-root user. > > I know I can use 'smbpasswd', 'samba-tool user setpassword', or > 'samba-tool user password', but these all seem to require root > privileges. When I run them as root, they

Linux has just raised the NGROUPS_MAX limit from 32 to 64k. In doing an audit of various tools, openssh turned up as having incorrect groups handling. Almost no user-space apps really care about NGROUPS_MAX. A proposed patch (untested, since the CVS build won't compile on my RH box.. :-/) : What think? Index: uidswap.c ===================================================================

Attached (and inline) is a patch to add the following config options: ControlBindMask ControlAllowUsers ControlAllowGroups ControlDenyUsers ControlDenyGroups It pulls the peer credential check from client_process_control() in ssh.c, and expounds upon it in a new function, client_control_grant(). Supplemental groups are not checked in this patch. I didn't feel comfortable taking a shot

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2847 Summary: Group not preserved with rsync 2.6.3 on Cygwin in daemon mode Product: rsync Version: 2.6.5 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

>> Bingo! It is exactly the same case. >> Two user names were spelled out slightly wrong >> in the /etc/group. As a consequence, >> under certain circumstances the "smbd" process >> keeps trying to resolve the name and doesn't >> take "no" from "nscd" for an answer. >> Each "smbd" process is looping around

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1060 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Comment #5 from djm at mindrot.org 2005-11-06 04:38 -------

Dear list members, i have installed a CentOS 7 x86_64 system. I want to let users authenticate over our ldap server. This seems to be working. ldap-username and ldap-passwords are accepted for the users configured in the ldap server. No problem. Now i want to restrict the access to users who have my centos-machine in their ldap host attribute. My problem is, that this host attribute seems to be

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1060 Summary: ~/.ssh/config check too strict on systems with per-user groups Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.1p1 Platform: Other URL: http://bugs.debian.org/314347 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Hello list, I encountered a problem in Samba 3.0.23 regarding the winbind use default domain = yes behaviour. It only works for the users an NOT anymore for the Group. So this make getent group to show NETBIOSDOMAINNAME/group which course mail squid configuration to fail. My squid configuration allowed access based on the AD groups, which are provided by Winbindd. Tested distribution: SuSE

Is the "winbind nested groups" functionality not currently working in Samba 3.0.23d? The readme files seem to indicate it should be (since 3.0.3), but then this message by Jerry to the list... http://groups.google.com/group/linux.samba/msg/5ecc575f70af3c8c ...seems to indicate that there's some patch waiting for 3.0.24. Unfortunately he's not specific as to what it

Dear all, i have a problem with sssd in conjunction with ldap on a centos 7 x86_64 box. ldap works fine. I can login there as an usual user registred in ldap. I want now restrict the access with ldap's host attribute. This is beeing ignored. Still every ldap user can login, no matter what the host attribute says. I googled around and only found that sssd.conf need two lines: access_provider

I need to look more into it, but before I start the long and arduous "googling my life away" process, I figured someone might know the answer. I've read the man pages several times and they didn't change! :-( As normal, while looking at one thing, something else bites my butt. I tuned on the swap field in top and sort on it. Here's an edited snippet of the results. Mem:

Hi, I saw in archive that some people made a patch to sftp-server, and that patch sets a root path. I'd like to know if there's an ideia to apply that patch in main tree of openssh? With the use of SSHFS [wich uses sftp-server], it would be interesting to have someting like that, because as we have netboot workstations, the access to devices [such as, floppy, cdrom and usb data] are

This is a post I sent by mistake directly to Ady without a reply to all (i.e., to the thread "Fail to set up UEFI syslinux on ArchLinux USB Flash Drive") It should go between Ady's post of Sun Mar 15 13:23:26 PDT 2015 and Ady's post of Mon Mar 16 06:03:58 PDT 2015 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: alex lupu <alupu01 at gmail.com> Date: Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 7:07

Trying to set up UEFI Syslinux boot on an ArchLinux USB 4GB stick. - Host system: 64-bit Ubuntu 14.10 on 56 GB hard drive - Hardware: ASUS P8H77-I, Bios v1101, i7-3770 at 3.40 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 - ArchLinux Instructions followed: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Syslinux#UEFI_Systems > ? ? 2. UEFI Systems > 2.2 Installation - Arch syslinux v.6.03 196352 Oct 13 22:25 /usr/sbin/syslinux