Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: ""smbclient -M <machinename>" generates "session request failed" - why?"
2004 Jan 17
2
Equivalent of "net send" command
I recall there being a command under linux, that I believe was a part of the
Samba suite, that allowed you to send messages to other machines, like one
would do using "net send" on an XP box, for instance. I have been trying to
figure out what that command was, but I cannot find it in the docs. I must
not be looking in the right place! Can anyone straighten me out?
Thanks!
-Josh
2007 Feb 20
0
Error creating machine account logs: Unable to open new log file /var/log/samba/machinename.log Permission denied
This problem doesn't seem to affect the client's connectivity but I am not
sure if it signals a larger problem. I started noticing this error:
Unable to open new log file /var/log/samba/"machine".log Permission denied
in the logs after upgrading to Samba version 3.0.21b. Any ideas?
2008 May 18
1
xen source (xm new machinename)
Hi, i am running Centos5.1 i386, with xen3.2.0 compiled from source rpms
provided on xen.org. As dom0 kernel i am using centos-xen kernels.
When i am trying to add new machine to xen source using xm new, this is what
i get :
[root@xxx /]# xm new centos01
Unexpected error: exceptions.ImportError
Please report to xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
1998 Oct 08
0
'Trying usename <machinename>'
Connecting from WinNT to Samba 1.9.18p10 I have another question:
When I have a drive map to my Unix homedir, which should be automatically
reconnected during login, I get an error that my password is not correct.
If I control the log file of Samba I see:
1998/10/08 17:37:43 changed root to /
open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket.
bind succeeded on port 0
open_oplock ipc: pid = 33822,
2010 Dec 21
3
name resolution: dns name different to windows machinename
>
> --- Original message ---
> Subject: Re: [Samba] name resolution: dns name different to windows
> machinename
> From: Gaiseric Vandal <gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com>
> To: <samba at lists.samba.org>
> Date: Monday, 20/12/2010 5:15 PM
>
> I am not sure how you would have a DNS server assign random names.
> But if
> you aren't going to have the
2009 Apr 08
1
Call Pickup Works w/Linksys ATA, not with Cisco 7940G
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I have an Asterisk 1.4.18 with a mix of cordless phones connected using
Linksys SPA2102 ATAs and Cisco 7940G
2010 Oct 30
2
Samba 3.4.9 net rpc shutdown and XP Domain client
Hi @all,
this is an very old problem, posted the first time 2005 to
samba-testers at samba.org:
If I have a Domain client with WinXP, which is part of a domain and
using this client, if the PDC is not available and want to remote shut
down this client with the net tool from other servers, then this is not
possible, because net tries to authenticate against the PDC:
testeis # net -d3 -S
2004 Sep 27
1
nmbd died: smb_panic2(1385)
After running several days in the same configuration, my 3.0.6
nmbd crashed with the above error (see log below). Maybe there
is a connection to this message some seconds before:
register_name_response: server at IP 192.168.0.4 rejected our
name registration of AK<1d> IP 192.168.0.12 with error code 6.
The ip .4 machine is a win2k server, which works (or should
work)
as an ordinary
2002 Nov 06
1
cupsaddsmb: cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was SUCCESS - 0
hi list,
We got the following problem:
We try to use samba 2.2.5 as a printserver for windoze clients
(samba 2.2.5 on RH linux 8 w/ CUPS 1.1.15).
CUPS works w/o any problems, but when we try to generate the drivers for
the windoze clients (by using cupsaddsmb), we get the following error:
>>
cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was SUCCESS - 0
result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
2010 Jul 28
2
Nat issue one way audio on IP dial
hi there,
i have posted earlier on the list but got no satisfying answer. the problem
is not big.
I have asterisk server directly connected with internet (79.80.x.x) and
clients are behind router. clients/users are registered with asterisk and
are using sipura and xlite softphone.
Now problem is that when a user calls other by dialing his IP:Port (sip
uri), call is connected fine and he can
2004 Jun 11
5
routing within the same network? is it possible?
Hello,
Is routing within the same network possible?
If it is, what configuration should I put for the firewall/router shown below? I basically want the host debian13 to be able to send packets via a multi-homed firewall. I think the multi-homed firewall involve some routing.
+-------------------+
|debian13 |
|eth0:192.168.0.13 |
+-------------------+
|eth0
|
2010 Jul 20
0
asterisk-users Digest, Vol 72, Issue 49
sorry for typo mistake in my last post. as from my orignal post two
registration of the same user are as follows
SIP/XYZ at 119.68.0.90:5060
SIP/XYZ at 202.16.34.10:5678
so dial command with unique-id i want to use will be
Dial(SIP/XYZ at 192.168.0.20:5062-096afee8,30,rtT)
Dial(SIP/XYZ at 192.168.0.12:64290-0966ab80,30,rtT)
and not
Dial(SIP/192.168.0.20:5062-096afee8,30,rtT)
2010 Jul 15
6
One way audio when dialing multiple registrations
Hi,
I am working on calling 2 registrations of same user on 2 different ip or
ports. It works fine and both phones ring simultaneously. the problem is
that there is one way audio, calling party can hear me but i can't hear
calling party.
here is the scenario..
SIP/XYZ at 192.168.0.20:5060
SIP/XYZ at 192.168.0.10:5678
i dial using following dial string
Dial(SIP/XYZ at
2005 May 04
4
One-to-One NAT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I''ve a problem with the configuration below
eth3 - Connection to ISP 1
eth4 - Server Farm Public address (202.73.10.*)
eth5 - Local Area Network (192.168.0.0/24)
I''m doing this one-to-one NAT because there is a server need to have the
public ip and it is located in somewhere that can only be reach by LAN.
I''ve
2004 Dec 28
0
Packet flow in relaying from SER to Asterisk
Hi,
I know the following is mostly the issue of SER and I already posted the
same content to SER User list. Just for more input, I posted it to this
list. Sorry for the cross post for some people.
I've set up SER for UA to UA call.
I'm thinking of setting up SER to relay to Asterisk PBX to use conference
call and voicemail of Asterisk.
I will employ this system for client connection
2014 Feb 14
3
LDAP Integration
My ldap config. Would this store incoming email in maildir format?
If so, can it be overriden? If so, where (possible place)?
hosts = 192.168.0.12:389
ldap_version = 3
auth_bind = yes
dn = llookup at domain.local
dnpass = password
base = OU=People,DC=domain,DC=local
scope = subtree
deref = never
user_filter =
2009 Mar 24
1
Inter-Asterisk Using SIP
Test
------Mensaje original------
De: tracinet
Remitente:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
Para:Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Responder a:Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] [Asterisk-Users] Inter-Asterisk Using SIP
Enviado: 6 Mar, 2009 5:55 PM
Basically, Server 1 is the main customer PBX where we have multiple
2007 Jun 15
0
Unable to find a suitable server
Hello List
I'm experienceing problems with Samba 3.0.25,1 running in a FreeBSD box.
I've succesfully joined a domain, and I've configured mail with auth on W2k3
server thorugh PAM.
YET
If I issue
mail# /usr/local/www > net rpc testjoin
Unable to find a suitable server
Join to domain 'DMSWARE' is not valid
BUT
mail# /etc > net rpc testjoin -S orion
Join to
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
=20
=20
12:53:41.358166 IP (tos 0xb8, ttl 127, id 0, offset 0, flags [none], =
proto:
UDP (17), length: 856) 189.8.113.170.5060 > 189.8.126.177.5060: SIP, =
length:
828
INVITE sip:7002 at 189.8.126.177:5060;user=3Dphone SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
189.8.113.170:5060;branch=3Dz9hG4bKba4h2m2070fhnc4q20k1.1
Call-ID: d6dc25017b171144f35fb9e1c9c393a3 at 10.0.0.10
2007 Jul 04
2
Xorcom Bri and asterisk crashes
We have recently install an asterisk solution with about 60 physical
extensions. While the system is running it runs reasonably well (Still
have a few teething problems) but twice now they have experienced a
degradation in voice quality and dropped calls and then finally asterisk
completely crashes out. Restarting asterisk will work for a little while
and it will crash again, each time less time