similar to: Strange memory stats with 2.4.13 and ext3

Hi, If this is a redundant post I apologize. I am running 2.4.20 on what has been a very stable Athlon machine for months, tried to move a 2 GB file from an ext2 partition to an ext3 and kjournald crashed. Here are the last reminants of my shell scrollback: [*ROOT* mofo /mnt/sda1/mysql/fd 641 ] ll oldmail/ total 2363288 -rw-rw---- 1 mysql mysql 2147483647 Jan 23 18:04 maillog.MYD

Hi, I am a new ext3 user and I am having some problems. I seem to have introduced a memory leak after adding ext3 support to the kernel. I noticed when running top or viewing /proc/meminfo my free memory pool seems to be decreasing while my buffers are increasing (around the same rate). I am currently using a root partition and a /var partition. I have listed the ext3 boot messages below.

This is just a rediff and retest - no ext3 changes in this release. http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ The latest diff is against linux-2.4.9. The version of ext3 in -ac kernels is current. -ac's ext3 has the "buffer tracing" debug code removed from the non-ext3 files, so the 2.4.9 diff is more useful for bug hunting. I should generate a diff against -ac to enable

I have tried everything to compile a new kernel on my 7.2 base system. I have used 2.4.13-ac6 and 2.4.13 w/ ext3 patch. I have compiled with ext3 built-in and with ext3 as module (with the initrd). I have a SCSI system so I have done the previous variations with both SCSI support built-in and modular (with the initrd). The error I get is: Remounting root filesystem in read-write mode: mount: no

Hi, I just wanted to compile my kernel 2.4.13 with the ext3-2.4.13-pre6 patch, but it doesn't work. It seems, that the patching failes by replacing some things in a textfile. Does anyone of you know, if there is a upcoming solution for this? Kind regards Jan Albrecht -- Jan Albrecht Phone: +49-5241-80-88404 System Consultant UNIX/NT Fax:

Hiya, Now that 2.4.13 has been release, any word on how stable ext3 is on this? Hope they haven't broken anything in the vm again....;) I'm currently running 2.4.8 and I'm very happy with it and given the nightware over the past few releases, just wanted to find out what the state-of-play is at the moment. -=David=

I am having some trouble compiling ext3 for the 2.4.13 kernel. It appears that the journaling source file is corrupted: In file included from sysctl.c:33: /src/linux-2.4.13/include/linux/jbd.h: In function `buffer_jbd': /src/linux-2.4.13/include/linux/jbd.h:241: `BH_JBD' undeclared (first use in this function) /src/linux-2.4.13/include/linux/jbd.h:241: (Each undeclared identifier is

An ext3 patch for the latest Linus kernel is at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ The changes are quite small: - Tided up some code now that quotas in Linus and -ac kernels are synced up. - Fix a race which can cause a null-pointer deref in ext3_writepage(). This bug has been there for a long time, but only manifested in 2.3.13-pre for some reason. I've tested this pretty

Since I ain't got a better place to report this, I do it here: Kernel 2.4.20-ac1 # uptime 16:31:00 up 2 days, 22:10, 7 users, load average: 1.89, 2.20, 2.99 This is our main mailbox server. We're running ext3: # cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext3 rw 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 /dev/sdb5 /boot ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/sda6 /home ext3 rw,noatime,nosuid 0 0 /dev/sdb8 /tmp

I am noticing considerably longer first page load times on most of my rails apps running Rails (1.1.2) off Mongrel (0.13) on linux. After the initial request everything seems to run OK. Has anybody else noticed this and is there anyway to compensate. Also following the instructions for working with unicode from the rails wiki, the number of pages served drops noticeably. Are there any sites

I have gotten the 2.4.13 kernel and the 2.4.13 ext3 patch. Unfortunately, it appears that some lines are wrapped, meaning that the long lines are actually on two lines, which throws the entire patching process off. Right now, my only recourse is to go through and manually fix the problem, which will take awhile, since there are more than 17000 lines of code! Is the problem on my end, or on the

Is there a way to tell how much memory the computer running R has? -Frank -----Original Message----- From: David Smith [mailto:dsmith at insightful.com] Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 1:32 PM To: Ross Boylan Cc: r-help Subject: RE: [R] R does in memory analysis only? Ross Boylan writes: > R works only on problems that fit into (real or virtual) memory. > ... does S-Plus have the same

Hello, What is the maximum number of simultaneous calls supported by asterisk. thks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090703/0794c554/attachment.htm

Hi all, Thanks for the prompt reply about 2.4.13. I applied the patch after I'd applied the win4lin and mki patches and it fails. The .rej file is included after this message. If you need any further info I'll try and supply it. Thanks Robyn This file is sched.h.rej from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/sched.h.rej *************** *** 399,404 **** u32 self_exec_id; /*

Rsync version 3.0.5pre1 is now available for release testing. This is a bug-fix release. Please test this new release and send email to the rsync mailing list with any questions, comments, or bug reports. To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.4, visit this link: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src-previews/rsync-3.0.5pre1-NEWS You can download the source tar file and its signature

Rsync version 3.0.5pre1 is now available for release testing. This is a bug-fix release. Please test this new release and send email to the rsync mailing list with any questions, comments, or bug reports. To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.4, visit this link: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src-previews/rsync-3.0.5pre1-NEWS You can download the source tar file and its signature

Hello I have used samba for many years, and it worked great (thanks!). Anyway, I recently decided to add a USB drive to the server. Currently running 2.6.29.2 linux kernel, debian etch. samba version 3.0.24 The USB drive is VFAT I am able to write small files remotely to the USB drive (a few Kb, 10's of Kb) without a problem. However, whenever I try to write something "larger"

We are running a benchmark that does single threaded 512 KB writes to a LUN on a CLARiiON storage array. The dual Xeon host (Dell 2650) with 4 GB of memory runs RHEL 4U3 We measured the write bandwidth for writes to the block device corresponding to the lun (e.g. /dev/sdb), a file in an ext2 filesystem and to a file in an ext3 file system. Write b/w for 512 KB writes Block device 312 MBps Ext2

I recently bought 2 different USB flash disks. These are some cheap no-name devices. Their parameters: bytes C/H/S ID 4194304512 509/255/63 Vendor: Generic Model: USB Flash Drive Rev: 1.00 ANSI SCSI revision: 02 4288676352 1023/132/62 Vendor: USB Model: USB 2.0 Rev: 1.00 ANSI SCSI revision: 02 When I put a FAT32 filesystem on them,

Hello, We have about 20 - 30 embedded machines running Linux 2.4.13, which the ext3-2.4-0.9.13-2413 patch applied. These are PowerPC 7410 based systems. I am getting reports of Oops happening either during removes (rm's), or coppies (cp's). Most reports state that issuing the same command once the system boots back up, does not cause it to crash. I guess its something else leading up