similar to: No subject

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "No subject"

1999 May 19
1
bind failed
Help me ! I cannot start smbd, it immediatly stops, I've got in my log.smb [1999/05/19 14:53:43, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(709) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Adresse déja utilisée.) And then It stops, I cannot launch smbd. I my /etc/services, I've got the two lines : netbios-ssn 139/tcp netbios-ns 137/upd and in /etc/inetd.conf netbios-ssn stream tcp
2004 Feb 02
2
Solaris 8 & Samba 3: "address already in use"
I am getting errors when I try to start smbd which say that port 445 is already in use, but nothing else is using it. In the log, the full error is: -----start log.smbd---- [2004/02/02 11:03:53, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(662) bind failed on port 445 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use ------end log.smbd----- In my /etc/services file, I have these entries:
1998 Oct 05
0
samba-1.9.18p10 - Solaris 2.6, postinstall and postremove scripts
Greetings all, See below for postinstall and remove scripts for the above release for those who may have wondered why they didn't work. Minor changes, but those below work. Find these scripts in ../samba-1.9.18p10/packaging/Solaris/pkg-specs. Regards Anthnoy :::::::::::::: postinstall :::::::::::::: #!/bin/sh # install samba nawk '/^netbios-[ns]*[ ]/ {next} {print} END { print
1998 Jul 20
2
Multiple interfaces
I have tried to set up Samba on my Solaris 2.5.1 with 2 interfaces (le0, le0:1 - one network card with two IP addresses). But all I could see is throught the default ports 137 and 139. In my /etc/inetd.conf, I have: netbios-ns dgram udp wait root /opt/samba/bin/nmbd nmbd -s/opt/samba/lib/kes.smb.conf netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /opt/samba/bin/smbd smbd -s/opt/samba/lib/kes.smb.conf
1997 Jul 30
0
Can't run SAMBA from inetd
I'm trying to start SAMBA from the inetd. I have added the port numbers to /etc/services: netbios-ns 137/udp netbios-ssn 139/tcp To my inetd.conf I have added: netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd netbios-ns dgram udp wait root /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd After this I killed any samba-prosecces, and refreshed the inetd with:
2001 Mar 02
0
Problems with Samba 2.0.7, Solaris 8, and Windows 2K
I have a Solaris box and Windows 2K box connecte through a hub, along with a DSL modem. I cannot get the two boxes to work via Samba, here is the relevant details. The status report from SWAT # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2001/03/02 12:54:01 # Global parameters [global] netbios name = MARISOL server string =
2001 Nov 26
2
Access denied from NT
Hi, I have a problem in accessing samba server from NT network neighbourhood. I can see the samba server icon on neighbourhood. But while trying to access then it's asking for user name & passowrd. I am not using local user & password from unix box rather it should be authenticated from NT PDC and accordingly I have modified the smb.conf file. Here is the sample of that. 103 flara %
2001 Mar 28
0
smbd is not started
Hi, I tried to map solaris to PC running 3.1 or 3.11 or so. That PC sees another solaris as it is mapped to it. No problem there. But to map to it the new solaris 5.7 system with latest samba i get "receiving computer is not responding". I did "ps -aef|grep smbd" and see it not running. nmbd is running. I followd the instructions as follows ans I see no smbd running. nmbd is
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and log.nmbd are empty. [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865) Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876) sesssetupX:name=[administrator] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)
1999 Dec 10
4
Samba errors
Dear list; I have been using samba 1.9.18p10 on a Sun Sparc Ultra 2 for about a year. I use it to share a directory to an NT/95 network. I now have a Sun Sparc Ultra 10 running Solaris 2.6. In order to prepare the Ultra 10 for y2k I downloaded samba-2.0.6-nonis+-sparc-sun-solaris2.6.pkg.gz from
2002 Jun 20
2
Could see the share
Hi, Samba world: It is my first time to use samba to share a folder from a solaris 7 to our windows 2000 clients. After I have the following, I could not see the unix share point. Your help is highly appreciated! 1) Install samba 2.0.5. 2) done the following: Edit /etc/services and make the following changes. Immediately after the line which reads: sunrpc 111/tcp rpcbind
2001 Apr 14
2
Extreme samba newbie needs help
Hi, I am having some troubles setting samba up nicely on my Slackware 7.1 machine. It is currently just a web/ftp server mainly for my personal use at home. I downloaded the tarball samba-2.0.7 and did everything to install it "properly." I edited services to include: netbios-ns 137/tcp # NETBIOS Name Service netbios-ns 137/udp netbios-dgm
1998 Oct 02
0
bind failed on port 139 error in log.smb???
I just install samba.1.9.18p10 version on my Solaris 2.6. Our network setup: the SAMBA server is on the same network with my NT Server PDC and NT workstation within PDC domain. I also have another subnet that have WinNT and Win95. We also use NIS domain server for our UNIX home user account. smb.conf: workgroup = NTPDC_NAME server string = SMBSERVER_NAME host allow = .... load
2000 Jul 14
1
Clarity on using SAMBA and Mapping to a Sun Server
My response is below. > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerald Carter [SMTP:gcarter@valinux.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 12:29 PM > To: Hawks, Steven L > Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA > Subject: Re: Can Samba be Installed on a Solaris 2.6 operating > system? > > "Hawks, Steven L" wrote: > > > > Can Samba be Installed on a
2002 Oct 01
1
using samba over AT@T broadband
Hello. I'm a Graduate Student, and I'm trying to set up Samba on my Solaris 2.8 box so that my team members can network map their home accounts from my Solaris box onto their PC. Everything works great within my home. (i.e. I have a home network, and all my PC's can mount my UNIX home directory.) My problem: I can't network map my Home Directory outside my local subnet.
2005 Sep 22
1
Question on Samba Service
Hi, For no particular reason, my Samba service didn't start yesterday, when I went to start it by going in the /usr/local/samba/sbin and then typing SMBD I got an error "permission denied" and something about the port 139 (sorry I don't have the whole error message) No changes were made on the box. I started looking over the web and I found an something out something to
2001 Mar 29
3
INETD Question.
I'm currently running version 2.0.7 of samba(CIFS9000). I have HPUX 11.x installed on the samba server. When I try to run this from inetd it doesn't work. I can run a startup script that runs the smbd as a daemon and it works fine. But if I try to run it from inetd it won't start. The previous version of Samba 1.9.18p10 that I had on this server worked fine. Is this a bug in
1998 Feb 25
1
netbios-ssn/tcp: unknown service
Sorry if this is such a basic question but I couldn't find anything about this in the FAQs/HowTos/Digest. I've compiled samba-1.9.18p3 on SunOS4.1.3_U1. When I tried to run smbd via inetd.conf (SIGHUP), I always get the following on the console. inetd[590]: netbios-ssn/tcp: unknown service I've edited the /etc/services to add: netbios-ssn 139/tcp And the /etc/inetd/conf with
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and log.nmbd are empty. [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865) Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876) sesssetupX:name=[administrator] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)
2005 Sep 21
0
Question on starting Samba service
Hi, For no particular reason, my Samba service didn't start yesterday, when I went to start it by going in the /usr/local/samba/sbin and then typing SMBD I got an error "permission denied" and something about the port 139 (sorry I don't have the whole error message) No changes were made on the box. I started looking over the web and I found an something out something to