similar to: No subject

Edit the file called src/EDITME and put the result in a file called Local/Makefile. Then you may proceed ... and next time ... you post an error message you may want to be specific ... not "or something like that" ... On Mon, 21 May 2001, Mager Charles WB wrote: > Again another email ALMOST off the point, but not quite. The first question, > which is to do with samba, is - How

When I try the command nmblookup -M TESTGROUP querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1 localhost

<-----------------------------------------------------------------------> Changes to user passwords are captured by a special DLL, which traps and then stores the password changes in encrypted form in a private area. On each synchronization schedule, the synchronization service first examines the SAM file for changes, and then checks this private area for passwords to be synchronized. Once

share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and log.nmbd are empty. [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865) Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876) sesssetupX:name=[administrator] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)

it were a Microsoft box... (Windoze is so stupid it'll never know the difference!) -----Original Message----- From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Fred Jackson Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:39 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: a question? Hi does the command line smbpasswd -j <domain> -r <PDC> apply to clients joining a

is turned on. Can anybody kind to confirm with me? Our network is using a mix of Win2k server, Win2k Pro, Win98, Win95 and WinMe machines, where the Win2k server is the domain controller and terminal service applications server and the Samba is a member fileserver of the domain. All workstations logon and mount the samba file services. We'd like to check if the problem could be solved by

why the install is failing. Do in need to rpm -e on all the 2.07 packages??? Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de [212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B884C4278 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 22:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from

cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- www.valinux.com VA Linux Systems gcarter_at_valinux.com www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path:

However.... When I try the command nmblookup -M LINUXSERVER querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1

if((group_c = *lp_force_group(snum))) { BOOL is_guest = False; some lines deleted token = create_nt_token(uid, gid, current_user.ngroups,current_user.groups, is_guest); must_free_token = True; } set_sec_ctx(uid, gid, current_user.ngroups, current_user.groups,token); /* * Free the new token (as set_sec_ctx

Are you using wins? Try lmhosts for the start? Are all machines on the same subnet? Just a few hints to start with ... Christian > > > I have absolutely no clue what I could do to fix it. The only solution I > can think of, is to downgrade to redhat 6.2. > > Your help would be greatly appreciated. > > Stefan Kaes > > portax.com GmbH > Zielstattstrasse 40, Geb.

Please note that Windows 9x clients are not true members of a domain for reasons outlined in this article. Therefore the protocol for support Windows 9x style domain logons is completely different from NT4 domain logons and has been officially supported for some time. Did you read this document? Let me know what needs to be updated and i will take care of it. Cheers, jerry

more specific on what your problem is? cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back."

... (port 138, setting options)... [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 3] nmbd/nmbd.c:(541) open_sockets: Broadcast sockets opened. [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 2] lib/interface.c:(85) added interface ip=141.43.132.161 bcast=141.43.132.191 nmask=255.255.255.192 [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 3] lib/util_sock.c:(832) bind succeeded on port 137 ... (port 138, setting options)... [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 2]

the files when you attempt to rename it. This is caused by Window's Media Player loading the file when you click on it. To work around this I had to go into Windows Explorer and change the folder options from "Enable Web Contents in Folders" to "Use Windows Classic Folders". This way, Windows Media player won't load the file when you click on it. Just trying to save

Is there another way of doing the bindings so that the Windows share doesn't run on TCP/IP but will still work with SAMBA? If so, where in the docs should I be looking, and if not - maybe this should be something discussed by the SAMBA dev people.. Regards, Marc. Return-Path: <twunder@iwmail.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com

Are you using wins? Try lmhosts for the start? Are all machines on the same subnet? Just a few hints to start with ... Christian > > > I have absolutely no clue what I could do to fix it. The only solution I > can think of, is to downgrade to redhat 6.2. > > Your help would be greatly appreciated. > > Stefan Kaes > > portax.com GmbH > Zielstattstrasse 40,

apply to this (security=domain) case, since auth is via the PDC. So, shouldn't winbind_lookup_sid() be succeeding. Should I be trying to track the failure in that code? In case it's helpful, ldd /usr/sbin/smbd shows: libdl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40017000) libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4001a000) libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x40030000) libc.so.6 =>

and that access to the client should be denied. > James > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander Lobodzinski" <lobo@mental.com> > To: <samba@lists.samba.org> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:17 AM > Subject: Can I have only certain users log in to a Samba DC client? > > > > A machine should be member of a domain controlled by

copy d:\bugs.ps \\ouessant\lexmark after having deleted all the samba log files and restarted the SMBd daemon from the SWAT Web interface. This leads to the INTERNAL ERROR, see samba.oulx Now, to locate the problem, I tried the same kind of command on the same file, bugs.ps, but using the SMBCLIENT application from the Linux server itself, without changing anything, nor restarting the SMBd