similar to: How to set up a share in smb.conf for ACL's

Hi Guys! A simple question.. I never worked with ACL's and since my costumer want some access levels for some sub-foldes in shares, I am reading some manuals about that.. But.. Before apply some testings, I need some advices about this.. Here is my question... Parent folder (share): FOLDER Sub-folder1: PROJETC1 Sub-folder2: PROJECT2 User1: DIRECTOR Group: Director/Projects User2: Employee1

I have an issue with samba+acl and Windows checkbox "Replace all Child object permissions" . I have a folder with defaults ACLs : /default:user:user1:rwx, default:user:user2:rwx owned by user1/ On Windows if I'm checking "Replace all Child object permissions with inheritable permissions from this object" on this folder, it losts the default ACL

Dear All. I have a file server. I installed the samba on it to store the document. See below for the security : - group : + g1 : user1, user2,user3 + g2 : user4, user5,user6 + g3 : user1,user5 - folder : + folder A : set permission chmod 775 and group chown root:g3 The problem is when the user1 modified a file in folder A then that file add the group g1 automatically. So

Hi, I sent you an email but now when I read it again, it looks like there were some mistakes in it... Please ignore that and address only the following message: Hi, I don't know if this is the right place to ask, but I really couldn't find it anywhere on the web and if you could only provide me with a quick hint, it would be really helpful! I'm experiencing the following problem

I have a samba share (using Samba 3.6.3) running on an ext4 filesystem with the "acl" mount option. The samba share is configured as follows: [myshare] path = /srv/myshare browseable = no public = no guest ok = no writable = yes printable = no create mode = 0660 directory mode = 0770 level2 oplocks = no oplocks = no I have configured the following ACLs on

On btrfs, do the following ------------------ # su user1 # cd btrfs-part/ # touch aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rw- group::rw- other::r-- # su user2 # cd btrfs-part/ # setfacl -m u::rwx aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rwx <- successed to setfacl group::rw- other::r-- ------------------ but we

Hi Here is my environment: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.7 (Tikanga) postfix-2.9.1-1.rhel5 dovecot 1.0.7 I want to config a complete postfix-dovecot mail server. First I configured postfix to use procmail, its default LDA and dovecot for pop3 and imap. I didn't changed main.cf a lot, just myhostname and a few other properties. I didn't set home_mailbox. About dovecot.conf

woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway. and i am not allowed to to give read rights do "any" (i.e. 755) but theres really no option in smb.conf like "read only users = " or something like that? Am 13.12.2011 17:56, schrieb Raffael Sahli: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:38:41 +0100, "skull"<skull17 at gmx.ch> wrote: >> I want to

Hello, I'm Oliver and I need help for a experiment. I have a sharing with Samba version 3.2.5, my distribution Linux is Debian(Lenny) and the acl version is 2.2.47. Below my configurations files: #/etc/fstab /dev/sda3 /shared reiserfs defaults,acl 0 1 #smb.conf [data] comment = files path = /shared inherit acls = yes inherit permissions = yes map acl inherit = Yes #

Hello, I have logging information for multiple machines, which I am trying to summarize and graph. So far, I process each host individually, but I would like to summarize the user count across multiple hosts. I want to answer the question "how many unique users logged in on a certain day across a group of machines"? I'm not quite sure how to scale the data frame and analysis to

I want to make a subfolder read only for certain users. for example: /data/pool is public rwx for all users. and now i would like to make a /data/pool/subfolder only rwx for user1 and grant read only permissions to user2 and user3 how do i do this? any links or direct tips on that? my suggestion would be something like this, but as you can imagine it didn't work: # The general datapool

I have a dataset like this (dput for this below) which represents user computer sessions: username machine start end 1 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 09:44:18 2011-01-03 09:47:27 2 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 09:46:29 2011-01-03 10:09:16 3 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 14:07:36 2011-01-03 14:56:17 4 user1 D5599.domain.com

Hi, Is this expected or not? From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> ? a uid fetch 43055 (envelope) * 1860 FETCH (UID 43055 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:52:59 +0900" "test1" ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com"))

On Tue, 1 Sep, 2020 at 09:59, Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com> wrote: > On 1. Sep 2020, at 6.24, TACHIBANA Masashi <tachibana at qualitia.co.jp> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is this expected or not? >> >> From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> >> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> >>

Hello I noticed a small bug in the way my extensions.conf work: Users can choose extensions 1-4 or 9 to tell why they're calling, and I'll send an e-mail to the person(s) to whom is involved. Extension 4 is actually for personal messages for User1, and extension 9 is for everyone (User1, User2, and User3). => For some reason, when the caller chooses extension 4, both User1 and User2

Dear, I have a working Samba 3.5.6 running on one of my servers onto which (existing) users can successfully log on. Recently, I needed to add some projects and some users but I cannot succeed in letting these new users access the shares. The smb.conf file is very small and I had only 4 users until now. In the following smb.conf, projA_dirs is only accessed by user1, while projB_dirs is the new

Hi all, I do have a mailbox-quota problem in dovecot 2.0.19 that is beond my understanding. Could someone pls. give me a hint. - user1 max. mailbox quota is set to 1GB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 15MB - user2 max. mailbox quota is set to 10MB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 10kB - user1 shares the folder 'shared_folder' to user2 with all rights (read, write ...) -

On 02/06/2017 11:48, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:11:09 +0200 > Alnis Morics via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Thank you, Rowland, for the reply. >> > >> And the nss tests as per Wiki seem to pass: >> > >> >> # getent passwd Administrator >>

Hi, looks like we detected a serious bug in dovecot's lmtp proxying where e-mails are delivered to the wrong user. The setup is: *) Dovecot is configured with "lmtp_proxy=yes" # Support proxying to other LMTP/SMTP servers by performing passdb lookups. lmtp_proxy = yes *) Postfix uses "dynamic recipient verification", so Postfix starts sending a (verify) mail by LMTP to

Hi list, I need to create the following share: user1 can create a file in the share but can't erase or change; user1 can just read the file when he creates it; user2 can delete and change the file user1 has created; I did like this: user1 is member of group group1; user2 is member of group group2; [share] path = /home/share read only = No write list = @group2