similar to: Win2K Client Intermittent Connections

I have had the following problems both with the stock samba 2.2 server that comes with RedHat 9 and several releases of samba 3.0, currently it's at 3.0.14a. When logging on to Windows 2000 computers using the samba server as an NT domain controller, certain profiles seem to get permission errors and windows just sticks you with a temporary profile that changes everytime you log on. It seems

A few days ago I installed dovecot stable to replace uw-imap. The install went well and all boxes were converted ok. When accessing the new imap server though, certain operations seem much slower, in particular, moving mail between boxes is very slow, and I have received several complaints from users that the mail server has slowed down. I can't figure out what the slow point is as maildir

I am currently running Centos 5.2 with 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5xen with 2 domu's One another Centos 5.2 and another Windows XP. The Centos DomU works fine and I never have any problems however my XP DomU crashes every so often with the bluescreen DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL then under the technical information tcpip.sys addres xxxxxx base at xxxxx datetime Xxxxxxxxx Is there a driver

Hi all, my system is a XEN3.4.1 Dom0 Host System with a HVM Windows 2008 R2 machine. After installation of the GPLPV driver ("gplpv_fre_wnet_AMD64_0.10.0.130.msi"), and an Reboot the Windows Server 2008 R2 comes up and ends in a bluescreen, and immediately restarts. Testsigning is ON. What else can be done, or better what needs to be checked? Is there somebody who is facing the same

I'm trying to accomplish what I had hoped would be a fairly simple filtering of traffic to my VMs, but I'm hitting a snag. The VMs are allowing traffic when I wouldn't expect them to. Host and Guest are both running the same platform: Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS 0.9.8-2ubuntu17.19 I have a basic bridge enabled on the host: brctl addbr brdg brctl addif brdg eth1 ip link set brdg up The host

Hi everyone since I''m currently migrating from xm to xl and now are also a victim of the said error, I started researching on it and found that many people had the issue but not many found solution and behind this BSOD (=Bluescreen of Death), there are actually multiple errors in hiding. What I would like to do is gather as much info as possible in this thread to form a kind of

Make sure you have: /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1 On 5/26/2014 1:35 PM, Matt LaPlante wrote: > I'm trying to accomplish what I had hoped would be a fairly simple > filtering of traffic to my VMs, but I'm hitting a snag. The VMs are > allowing traffic when I wouldn't expect them to. > > Host and Guest are both running the same platform: > Ubuntu

On 5/28/2014 10:10 AM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 05/27/2014 02:46 AM, Brian Rak wrote: >> Make sure you have: >> >> /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1 > That doesn't make sense. bridge-nf-call-iptables controls whether or not > traffic going across a Linux host bridge device will be sent through > iptables, but the rules created by nwfilter are applied

Hi! :o) I've got an Debian linux running on an Alpha machine.I had a Celeron II before, with Samba 2.2.6. I've made the change to Samba 3.0.0 and then I've just upgraded to 3.0.2a tonight. In the old smb.conf I've had a line "include = /etc/samba/configs/%U.conf" that was good in the old state, but with the new it doesn't work. I find out that the samba does not

I have a Win2K3 domU (and thankfully an image backup of the LVM volume that holds its system disk) I previously installed GPLPV v0.8.9 drivers, the domU boots OK with or without the /GPLPV switch in boot.ini, however with the /GPLPV switch it tries and fails to use the Xen network driver, and so the machine is network-less, so for the past few months I''ve left it using pure HVM

On 05/27/2014 02:46 AM, Brian Rak wrote: > Make sure you have: > > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1 That doesn't make sense. bridge-nf-call-iptables controls whether or not traffic going across a Linux host bridge device will be sent through iptables, but the rules created by nwfilter are applied to the "vnetX" tap devices that connect the guest to the

Le 25/11/2019 ? 09:15, L.P.H. van Belle via samba a ?crit?: > I tested Friday also with a W7 pc. > Not working, im try to see what i can do today on this problem. > > Greetz, > > Louis Hi Louis, Thanks for your help. I'm still investigating on it, but sadly i cannot upgrade to 4.11 as those servers cannot reach external repositories for security reasons (those servers

hail 2the king of bootloader! i created and image of my windows 2000 installation, gziped it. now i am using memdisk to load it into ram. everything works fine. but when loading disk drivers, it does not find the correct one to access the 'memdisk' so i get a bluescreen: 'inaccessible boot device'. a have to choose the right device drive and install it manual. but what is the

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > close 522060 Bug #522060 [src:xen] xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64: xen hvm Windows Bluescreen - clock interrupt was not recevied onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 522060:

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > close 535150 Bug #535150 [src:xen] xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386: xen hvm Windows Bluescreen Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 535150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=535150 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems

Hello Scott, Am 04.06.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Scott Lovenberg: > Marc, I'm assuming your test was a clean Samba install with stock > configurations and a clean Windows-10 9926 (with no previous contact > to either AD or NT4 domains)? Yes. It was a new installed Windows 10 TP build 9926, with no contact to any AD or NT4 domain before. Also the Samba 4.2.1 PDC was a fresh installation

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > Hello Scott, > > Am 04.06.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Scott Lovenberg: >> Marc, I'm assuming your test was a clean Samba install with stock >> configurations and a clean Windows-10 9926 (with no previous contact >> to either AD or NT4 domains)? > > Yes. It was a new installed

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42672 Bug #: 42672 Summary: NMI SERR with 2 Geforce 310 cards Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: 7.7 (2011) Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as

I just set up a fresh Samba PDC using OpenLDAP as the passdb. When I start smbd, I notice some log messages about failing to create some builtin groups: Administrators and Users. Is Samba trying to run a group add script which I have not setup or to create posixGroups in LDAP which it does not have permission to do? I turned up debugging output and saw that it complained about not getting gids