similar to: Netatalk and Samba???

hi all, I've read trough the list and see discussions with similar problems. I've setup a file server and users can connect to it via SMB/CIFS. Windows users just happy. The problem starts with the Mac users. All Mac users are using OS X (versions 10.2,10.3). I'm vetoing several files right now, permission inheriting turned on, I've forced the create mode and directory mode to

(This is a brief announcement of a focused development/refinement of the Netatalk project.) The primary goal of Baltra is to provide a Mac OS X compatible AFP file sharing service with Samba 3.0 compatibility. We are hoping to have an AFP file sharing daemon which can run in parallel with Samba 3.0 to provide seemless file sharing amoungst SMB-based clients (Windows and MacOS-X) as well as

Hi, I have got problem with samba 2.2.5a and Mac OS X 10.2.6. I my network the samba is working great, but when I connected the Mac system, I can see on it every file with size 16 MB. So when I try to burn 50 files 1 kB each, I can't because MacOS is taking size 16 MB of each. When I try to burn the same files from windows sharing, there every file have got size 4 kb, so it is ok.Where should

since "ea = samba" was only added to very recent netatalk versions and so don't apply to files with a history of many years what is the way to go get rid of netatalk these days? is there still no tool to read/write the existing netatalk appladouble extended attributes which are *not* compatible with samba and write them back in the new format? afp.conf: appledouble = ea ea = samba

Take a look at this output from lsof: smbd 11490 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 afpd 31010 0 2u REG 3,3 3207 1136655 auction - envelope.rtf afpd 31010 0 5u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work File L 1 afpd 31010 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 smbd 31386 0 9u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work

Hi. I'd like to find some way for Samba to convert the filenames created by Macintosh OS X into something windows can use. According to their docs: http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/macosx/Essentials/SystemOverview/FileSystem/chapter_9_section_13.html filenames are stored as canonically decomposed Unicode 2.1 in UTF-16 format (a sequence of 16-bit codes) Samba running on a

I've just noticed that --with-netatalk and --with-quotas are options to configure for samba. Is anyone using these options on Solaris 7, and what do they do and how well ? I'd really like to display a users quota as "disk size" and their remaining space as "disk free". Is --with-quotas the right way to go about this ? I also run netatalk. Do I need to use

Hi all, I'm have a Linux Box running samba and netatalk, and a file system shared with Mac and Windows users. My problem is that when a user in Windows delete a file that have a Macintosh label (color), and later the Windows user put another version of the file with the same name, the Macintosh label still apear (and this is not the behavior that i need). I view in the file system that

hi@all i'm using netatalk and samba as fileserver for different clients (OS9,X,WinNT/2K/XP) to create shares, that are visible and accessible for all clients (via afp/smb) i created a folder and made it public in all daemons (atalk, samba) to get a better file handling i'm using the samba feature: vfs object = netatalk but there are still some problems files that are created via afp

I've got a file server running both Samba and Netatalk ([OT] which are two programs that dearly need to be rolled into one). I've *tried* to configure it to minimize problems between the two, but I've run into a problem where users can't delete folders that contain, e.g., .AppleDouble folders in them. When I try from smbclient, I get: NT_STATUS_DIRECTORY_NOT_EMPTY removing

Client: Dual 1GHz G4 OSX 10.2 Gig-Ethernet Server: Dual 2GHz P4 Linux 2.4.18 Raid-5 1TB Gig-Ethernet With netatalk 1.5.5 I get sustained writes of 66MB/s (yes, megabytes) With samba 2.2.7a I get sustained writes of 15MB/s I've tweaked the settings and ended up with these: socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE read raw =

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [please cc to my address] Dear Samba and Netatalk experts, I've got a server running both samba 2.2.3a as PDC and netatalk (1.5pre7 as supplied by SuSE73). Samba machine accounts are added to /etc/passwd automatically by the command add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 90 -s /bin/false -M %u when a NT machine is added to the

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20141214/3d32f770/attachment.html>

what is the source and destination filesystem? here is some report that rsync has some problem with HFS+ filesystems and "ressource forks": http://quesera.com/reynhout/misc/rsync+hfsmode/ but as you are using ubuntu and not osx i`m curious what`s the problem, so i think we need more information here. regards roland > Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Dezember 2014 um 15:31 Uhr > Von:

Am 27.04.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Ralph Boehme: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:08:46AM -0700, Scott Call wrote: >> Thanks for the response! >> >> This would be really helpful because we use a lot of old adobe type 1 fonts >> that are 100% resource fork and are rendered unusable without the >> marshalled xattr's in addition to the AFP_ streams. > > resource

I recently took over a x86_64 CentOS 4.0 server running an "unsupported" kernel. On examining the box it seems that perhaps it is because of the use of xfs and netatalk. I would like to update the box to 4.3. I think I can do away with the netatalk, but doing away with xfs would require a substantial amount of work. Questions: 1: In reading the archive of this list there was a post

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > > Am 17.05.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > >> Am 17.05.2018 um 14:22 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > >>> iirc the only thing that is currently not working is cross-protocol xattrs for > >>> xattrs

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > > Am 17.05.2018 um 16:56 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > >> > >> Am 17.05.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > >>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: >

Hello, Anyone out there running a production network supporting PC and Macintosh clients using samba and netatalk. we are currently using NT 4.0 with AppleTalk-IP software. Sharing the same files with the Macs and the pc is a must. I read someplace that samba 2.2.2 supports Appletalk. Is this true? Thanks, Joe

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:33:10AM +0900, HAT wrote: > Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:22:56 +0000, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > > On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. > >> > >> The EAs are not seen from clients yet. > >> > >> smb.conf: > >> path =