similar to: SV: Samba-Citrix compatability

Windows 2000 sp2 with Terminal Services and Citrix 1.8 Metaframe as 'client'. --- Problem starts at 40 to 50 users logged on. 7-9 shares mapped at login. Effect is 'access denied' on accessing directories restricted by group access even though user has valid unix /etc/group access. --- Machine SunFire 880 Samba 2.2.4 Configured with "-without-winbind" Solaris 8

I am running Citrix Metaframe XP on Windows 2000 server and would like to have the ability to access files on my AIX Unix server. Are there any issues with Samba in a Windows Terminal Server environment? Thanks, Tim Brooks

"H-disk" share is " /home/%U/disk" User1 H: ---------> /home/user1/disk (h-disk) User2 H: ----------> /home/user2/disk (h-disk) When User1 opens a file "H:Øfoo.doc" and then User2 opens a file on this share with the _same_ name ("H:Øfoo.doc") we get from Word (office programs?): "Foo.doc already opened by another user". When user1

Hi All I have a Win2K server with Citrix Metaframe XPe installed on the network and uses mapped network drives to a Samba file server. The Citrix server is locking users out of the mapped network drive on the samba server. Citrix has 125 concurrent licences and Terminal services licences of the same amount Samba version is 2.2.3a Running on a Redhat 7.3 box. Please advise if more into is

Hi, Is it possible to use samba with Citrix Metaframe to allow Unix users running Windows applications and having access to their unix directories? I'd like to know if there is no problem of authentication and permissions. Thanks in advance Benoit.

I have recently played with and did get a working copy of Asterisk functioning in the lab environment. Then when I moved it out of the lab and onto the outside of our firewall it functions as before except that I get a Connected to Asterisk CVS-08/21/04-12:16:04 currently running on 63 (pid = 1478) ??? -- Starting Skinny session from ??.???.114.131 (PIX (6.3) our firewall) Aug 26 14:48:34

G'day, We are having problems when connecting to our Solaris 8 server Zeus from our Windows 2000 Terminal Servers. We are running Samba 2.2.8a on the unix box and are finding that from time to time people are having difficulty opening files from shares on this server. They also have difficulty mapping network drives. It reports errors such are "file doesn't exist". However, we

Hi, Does Samba 2.2.4 on Solaris 8 support 64 bit? We are using Clearcase & Rational told us that only samba 2.2.5 support 64 bit? Any help would be arreciated. Thanks, -Murali

Citrix Web client lets me login to the Metaframe server, but when I try to launch an application, I get a message that I cannot connect to the server. I must have 128-bit SSL support installed. . . . I'm using Firefox 1.5 as a browser and I can log into my bank, which requires the 128 bit SSL, so somewhere between logging into the Citrix server and trying to launch an application,

Hi all, I've dug through the lists and google, but haven't found very much info on using Citrix with a samba PDC. The small number of messages and information I've found, lead me to believe it will work. Does anyone have any first hand knowledge they'd be willing to share? I'm currently involved in rolling out Citrix for proprietary windows apps for remote offices.

Hi, My setup: RedHat 7.3 PDC server with samba 2.2.7 rpm rebuilt with max connections patch and ldapsam and a few other minor changes, openldap 2.0.23-4. Windows 2000 Terminal Server with SP3, with various pre SP4 updates too. Various Win2K Pro, Win95 OSR2 clients. [homes] comment = Home writable = yes valid users = %S nt acl support = no oplocks = no path = /md3/profiles/%U

This weekend I upgraded SAMBA from 2.2.2 to 2.2.3a then made it the PDC on our LAN. Original PDC was an NT4 Server. There is a Win2K Server running Citrix Metaframe-XP, and the old NT4 PDC Server was replaced with another Win2K Server to be the Database Server. I didn't want to bother with setting Win2K up as a DNS and DFS/ADS Server (required for being a PDC), so selected to make SAMBA the

Hello! I have heard that there is a problem with using Samba along with Windows Terminal Services and that it's related to session IDs with multiple users coming from one server. I'm in the process of moving to Windows Server 2003 using Citrix and hoping to be able to revive our samba use. Has anyone had any success with using samba in a Terminal Server / Citrix environment? Thanks

Hi all, I've posted a similar message a few weeks ago. I had the 'oplock' problem. I run a linux server with samba (specification below). I get a reply who told me to disable kernel oplocks and oplocks. I did exactly what he told me to do. I hoped it worked... but it did not... From there one i started reading in the archives and followed the 'lock' discussions in this list.

Hi Folks, I was wondering if anybody else on this list is using, or trying to use, Samba (esp. on an IBM mainframe) as a print server in a Citrix Metaframe environment, or are we the first? We're getting one or two odd problems... Metaframe is creating the printers on our Samba server as "Client" printers, rather that connecting to them direct. We can connect and print fine from

Currently, our organization grants some employees remote access to SAS and other software through a secure Citrix-based network server. We would like to install R on a dedicated network server and enable remote access through Citrix. Is this possible? If so, what additional software would we need? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Erick Edwards

Troy, This does work in the security=domain situations (This is what I am currently using in my smb.conf). You do not need to do anything special for joining the doman when using the aliases. Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:15:44 -0600 From: "Troy.A Johnson" <troy.johnson@health.state.mn.us> To: <samba@lists.samba.org> Subject: [Samba] security=domain and Citrix MetaFrame on

Does this work for: security = domain situations? Do you have to do anything special with regard to joining the domain. >>> <Drew.Zeller@statcan.ca> 11/27/02 09:16AM >>> I saw your postings and thought I would through in my two cents for the Windows 2000 Terminal Server and Samba. The MultipleUsersOnConnection does not seem to work in Windows 2000 version of Terminal

We restored to 3.0.23d after update to 3.0.25a because of strange dfs behavior. the detailed situation: on msdfs root server 'samba' ls -lR dfsroot/: drwxr-xr-x appl1 dfsroot/appl1 lrwxrwxrwx share1 -> msdfs:server1\share1 [dfs] comment = "SaMBa DFS root" path = /path.../dfsroot # next line does not work prior 3.0.25 !!! # hide unreadable = Yes

Hello, at this time we're using s. 2.2.8a (running on SuSE-Linux StandardServer 8 - Kernel 2.4.21) as fileserver for our terminal server environment. We ran into the 128 connections per client limitation and had to modify the MAX_CONNECTIONS-parameter in smbd/conn.c. Now we're planning the migration from s. 2.2.8a to s. 3.0.1. Is the modification in smbd/conn.c still necessary, when using