similar to: net groupmap modify ntgroup="Domain Admins" ... succeeds but fails

Hi, The group that is mapped to rid=512 cannot be used in "valid users", the users cannot map the share (error 5). Is this normal? Should I file a bug? Version 4.1.6-Ubuntu server role = classic primary domain controller smb.conf: valid users = +smbadmin command: net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=smbadmin rid=512 type=d As soon as I remove the group

I have a couple questions that I will submit separately. When I have IPchains running I can't get my samba box to show up in network neighborhood, but when I turn ipchains off the box shows up. What rules do I need to add for things to work properly? -- Raymond Norton Little Crow Telemedia Network 320-234-0270

µë-

I tried migrating our samba settings from one machine to another, but Windows sees it as a different server. I currently have an older version of samba setup on an old machine. I setup the latest version of samba on a different machine with different build specs (e.g. acl support, etc.). I migrated over the usernames/passwords and MACHINE.SID file (is this even used anymore?) and setup smb.conf

Problem number one: ------------------- I'm running a few-hours-old CVS version of Samba 3.0 with LDAP as the authentication backend, and I'm having some problems trying to set up the LDAP accounts using "smbpasswd". I build the structure of the LDAP database by importing a couple of LDIF's, and then I import the following user account to create an administrative account

Hi! I am experiencing problems adding a user (e.g. smbadmin) to the "Domain Admins" group on my samba-PDC using the ldapsam backend. When I add "Domain Admins" as a supplementary group, the Windows 2000 client doesn't treat smbadmin as an admin. However, using "Domain Admins" as the primary group (including setting sambaPrimaryGroupSID as

I have an [apps] share that was intended to be read-only (to keep viruses away) however some Windows programs require rw access to specific files. I don't want to open-up everything on the share to rw, only those specific files/directories that need 'w' access. Here's the dilemma: In order for users to be able to change a file, the file and directory it's in need to have rw

Hi! I have a problem with roaming profiles which I don't understand. I can login and logout from XP with a samba PDC with ldapsam flawlessly, but for some reasons when the profile does not belong to the user itself windows tells me upon logout that it cannot copy back some files to the server. Weird, because the directory where the profile resides is readable and writable by the user,

Hello, I just narrowed down an rsync command that keeps failing to the --delete flag: rsync -vv --delete --backup-dir=backup_target --archive /etc myuser@localhost: It gives the following output: ... backup_dir is --delete/ building file list ... done Invalid file index: 1868985864 (count=0) [receiver] delta-transmission enabled rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at sender.c(189)

In the past, I had restricted rsync so that the -e option was disallowed. As of rsync-3.0.0, I'm now seeing the following requests being made (on the server side): rsync --server -vlogDtprze.iL . I want to prevent '-e' as a client side option so arbitrary programs can't be executed. I found the following, but didn't trace through to verify exactly where I was in the code

I have experienced a couple of (minor) problems with Samba Thought I would report these and ask if they are known problems. 1. Problem with "!" in username map file 2. Samba tools e.g. smbstatus, testparm not accounting for "config file" parameter 1. There appears to be a problem with a minor part of username map file interpretation. When I put an exclamation mark

when trying to put a samba3 server into a domain (samba3 pdc) I always get the following error messages: [root@file samba]# net join -d 2 -U smbadmin RHEL -S server1.example.com [2004/09/30 23:36:35, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(79) added interface ip=192.168.0.150 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 smbadmin's password: [2004/09/30 23:36:37, 1] libads/ldap.c:ads_connect(251)

Hi! I'm experiencing strange performance problems after upgrading to samba 3.2.8 from 3.0.30. For all users except smbadmin (who has administrative rights), read performance is _very_ bad. Looking at the read-requests using filemon and wireshark, I found out that for those users, every read is handled transparently (unbuffered) over the net. (I.e. a 2 byte read-request of the application

[username@localhost source]# ./configure --with-fhs --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --with-privatedir=/etc/samba --with-lockdir=/var/state/samba --localstatedir=/var --with-netatalk --with-smbmount --with-pam --with-syslog --with-sambabook --with-utmp --with-acl-support > ~/myconfig.out 2>&1 [username@localhost source]# cat ~/myconfig.out | grep acl checking for sys/acl.h... yes

Sorry if this is a dup. I sent right before I subscribed to the list, so I'm not sure if it made it. I have just taken over a redhat system with Samba 3.0.0 configured with security = user, and domain logins enabled. I've included the smb.conf at the end of this message. I would like to upgrade to 3.0.10 for a numbers of reasons, one being security and one being that password changes

OK, I had this working a few days ago, but have evidently changed something that I cannot locate. Someone hit me with their 2x4. Samba 3.0.22, Fedora Core 4, ldapsam (OpenLDAP 2.3.24). smbd will not start, with the "ERROR: failed to setup guest info" error (I have "guest account = guest", which is a valid user with correct info in LDAP): ldap_connect_system: Binding to ldap

I found the solution, or at least a work around, for my posting: "Can not grant SeMachineAccountPrivilege on Debian Etch" I ended up: 1) ssh to Debian Etch as root 2) smbpasswd -a root 3) issue the "net rpc rights grant ..." command SUCCESS!!! So, that raises the question that what MUST be executed as user root verses a member of ntgroup="Domain Admins"? I suspect

Hello have configured samba to authenticate with an LDAP backend everything works fine including testing the configuration files until I start the net sam provision. Below is the error<http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/237835-50-samba-ldap-failing-create-domain-users-admins#>message I get lib/smbldap_util.c:310(smbldap_search_domain_info) smbldap_search_domain_info: Adding domain info for

Hello all, I've noticed that removing a user from a group in /etc/group does not immediately prevent the user from accessing files / directories which the group still has access to. For example, say user 'cwseyst2' only has access to access to 'plc' if it is in group 'plc-staff'. # getfacl plc # file: plc # owner: smbadmin # group: smbadmin user::rwx group::rwx

Hello, On Debian 9 (stretch prerelease) I am able to mount with the following command with root using the following command: mount -t cifs //smb.physics.wisc.edu/smb /smb -osec=krb5,multiuser,username=smbadmin at PHYSICS.WISC.EDU --verbose root can also access files as expected However, when cifs-utils 6.6-5 is installed, a different user cannot access as expected: ls /smb ls: cannot