similar to: samba 3.0.0 spec file problem - OT ?

After a bunch more investigate, I've seem to have figured out what is going on here. The MachineFunction holds a vector of MachineBasicBlocks and it is this vector that is traversed by the MachineFunction iterator when printing out instructions. The problem is occurring when a modification to the CFG moves around so that the ordering of them is different. Even if the pred/succ blocks are

On Oct 14, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > But, the branch folding pass, or whatever passes are supposed to > reorder the blocks based on the CFG, are not doing so in this case. > Otherwise there is no way that blocks 2 and 4 should be printing out > before blocks 3 & 5. Renumber blocks just seems to reorder the > values based on their pre-set block number,

Chris, I took a look at AnalyzeBranch and I don't see how it can solve my problem. The issue itself isn't with branching, as I can handle branches fairly well in my custom pass(see the before and after dot files attached). I can take a bunch of branches and construct high level control flow for my backend since I have no ability to do goto/jump, only whileloop and ifs. So analyzing the

But, the branch folding pass, or whatever passes are supposed to reorder the blocks based on the CFG, are not doing so in this case. Otherwise there is no way that blocks 2 and 4 should be printing out before blocks 3 & 5. Renumber blocks just seems to reorder the values based on their pre-set block number, but when the CFG is modified these number should modified also to follow the new

My group is working with datasets between 100 Mb and 1 GB in size, using multiple log ins. From the documentation, it appears that vsize is limited to 2^30-1, which tends to prove too restrictive for our use. When we drop that restriction (set vsize = NA) we end up hanging the server, which requires a restart. Is there any way to increase the memory limits on R while keeping our jobs from

On Oct 13, 2008, at 5:14 PMPDT, Villmow, Micah wrote: > As stated in an earlier email, I am working on getting break/ > continue to work correctly for my backend, but I ran into another > issue with codegen and the CFG. It seems that code gen is not done > based on the CFG, but rather on the block numbers, and the function > call MachineFunction::RenumberBlocks doesn’t

As stated in an earlier email, I am working on getting break/continue to work correctly for my backend, but I ran into another issue with codegen and the CFG. It seems that code gen is not done based on the CFG, but rather on the block numbers, and the function call MachineFunction::RenumberBlocks doesn't renumber the blocks based on the CFG. So how can I modify the CFG so that when codegen

Hi all, after installing samba 2.2.5 (on Solaris8 running NIS+) it is not possible to create user entries in smbpasswd. I generated the smbpasswd file by # cat /dev/null | /samba/samba-2.2.5/source/script/mksmbpasswd.sh > /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd ----- then tried to create user entry "dummy" in smbpasswd by (user "dummy" exists under NIS+) # smbpasswd -a dummy

We're using Samba 3.0.21a-1 on a CentOS 4.2 server (kernel 2.6.9-22.0.2.ELsmp); everything works more or less fine, it's functioning as the PDC with an OpenLDAP back end (setup essentially straight from the Idealx.org playbook), etc. We're trying to mount Windows shares to back them up, and getting "permission denied" errors when trying to read certain files from those

Building from samba-3.0.0/packaging/RedHat/samba.spec in the September 25 samba-3.0.0.tar.bz2 ends with + mkdir -p /var/tmp/samba-3.0.0-root/usr/share/swat/images /var/tmp/samba-3.0.0-root/usr/share/swat/help /var/tmp/samba-3.0.0-root/usr/share/swat/include /var/tmp/samba-3.0.0-root/usr/share/swat/using_samba + mkdir -p

Hi all, I want to compile FORTRAN 95 code with LLVM. More specifically, I would like to get an AST dump of the program I compile, statically analyze the AST, make modifcations to the AST and then feed it back to LLVM. Do you have any hints as to how I should proceed about doing this. I noticed that clang has an ast-dump option but don't know whether it supports FORTRAN 95. I am a LLVM newbie

Dear R users I get a weired problem when use sink: since the data set pretty big, I sink intermediate result for further use,following lines are consistently used when write data ########################### sink("dataname.txt") data sink() ########################## at first couples of run, all 10 variables are wrote to a file in following format: V1 V2 ....... V10 1

Hi, I want to fix several entries of mail attribute mail that have an error something like this: *john at domain.com *joe at domain.com *mary at domain.com and so on. I want to to change them to: john at domain.com joe at domain.com mary at domain.com (Delete asterisks) How can I perform it in one (or at least few) steps? thanks in advance! -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com

Hi, Where can i find up to date samba4 related smb.conf settings? Is this for samba4 too: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch06.html Thanks, Robert

I have a Samba4 AD Domain with one of the file servers as a domain member. This file server host the main network shares for the domain. Currently, Windows users mapping this share are authenticated using their AD domain credentials. That all works just fine. What I want to do now is ALSO allow a user on a network host which IS NOT a domain member, and the user is not domain users to also

Hai, The docs shown are a bit old, yes, i suggest start reading these. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_POSIX_ACLs Look at the smb.conf man and search for acl ( or exec ) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens

Just a trivial question... Do the hosts allow and hosts deny clauses (i.e. within smb.conf) support the use of IPv4 CIDR notation (e.g. A.B.C.D/maskbits) ? The specific documentation page I was looking at, i.e.: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch06.html was rather entirely ambiguous on this one small point. When describing the interfaces clause, it says explicitly that CIDRs

Hi, so you would like to restrict the access to the share definitions? E.g. only "User1" should be able to access the Share "Private"? Have you had a look at this documentation? https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch09.html (This doc is quite old but should still apply). We're running a seperate fileserver which is joined to the SAMDOM DC. Then we're using

Hi all, I have a Samba share set up using POSIX ACLs as the permissions backend. I am seeing an issue where files created via the Samba get execute permissions whereas files created via shell do not. Here’s my demonstration using “share2” as the root of my share: [root at samba srv]# ls -l total 0 drwxrwx---+ 2 root root 65 Dec 17 18:40 share2 [root at samba srv]# getfacl share2/ # file:

Matthias, Sorry I should have wrote more details. I agree with your message and I understand that template12 is not meant to be a share. What I tried to say is: when I have this configuration: [template12] writable = yes browsable = yes valid users = alex [alex] path = /home/alex copy = template12 I can see this error in /var/log/samba/log/smbd [2016/04/25 16:44:14.719192,