similar to: Problem with a dos program running from a samba share.

hello, i try to add a speex compression on the TDM Talkthrough on the BF-533 EZ-KIT LITE but when i compile i obtain the following errors: [Error li1021] The following symbols referenced in processor 'p0' could not be resolved: 'speex_bits_destroy [_speex_bits_destroy]' referenced from 'Debug\Process_data.doj' 'speex_bits_init [_speex_bits_init]' referenced from

Hi; I'm having a really odd problem with some Windows ME stations connected to a Samba server. From a command prompt on the ME stations, I do the following: dir *.* This works as expected, all the files in the directory are displayed. I then do: dir test.txt And I get: General failure reading drive G Abort, Retry, Fail. The directory contains the file, and the file shows up in a full

I really appreciate all your responses on this. I might not have fixed it by looking at samba logs but i noticed there was directory in user unix directory with wildcard * as folder name once i removed it, samba showed up all the files and directory. am not sure what would * as folder name caused this behaviour may be samba was trying to interpret * as something else not sure...... or it was

Hi all, I wanted to give an update on this as I know this MS Hotfix is critical and must be applied to protect against the (latest) Microsoft worm. I think I've found the problem in the code, and am currently testing a fix for this (not in the release to others to test stage yet). As soon as I'm reasonably confident I'll put a patch out there for others to test, and we'll

Hello ! I am sure this has been posted before but I can not find it. I have used a file to check witch files a .inf file shall use. This util was very good to have when making a printers.def file. My problem is that I can not find the file anymore and I do not know the name of it. Thanks, /Mikael

Jeremy: Just wanted to pass this snippet I saw from slashdot http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/07/053230 which says: Public Comment Period In MS/DOJ Battle Posted by timothy on Wednesday November 07, @07:03AM from the tap-your-mind dept. PacketMaster writes: "Somthing that I didn't know, and perhaps many others didn't

The proposed settlement in the Microsoft antitrust trial will probably be accepted by the judge unless a lot of people complain soon, even though it lacks any useful enforcement provisions and fails to prohibit many of Microsoft's anticompetitive practices. I've drafted an open letter to the Department of Justice to explain why the proposed settlement should not be accepted; it's at

The Samba Team would welcome Microsoft documenting its proprietary server protocols. Unfortunately this isn't what the settlement stipulates. The settlement states : "E. Starting nine months after the submission of this proposed Final Judgment to the Court, Microsoft shall make available for use by third parties, for the sole purpose of interoperating with a Windows Operating System

I'm a mathematician and programmer working on experimental surround sound techniques. Some of the ideas I'm working on require dozens of channels. These channels are often highly correlated and are very well suited to compression. I'm new to Vorbis. Does it attempt to address such issues? Thanks, --Richard --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project

Hi, I'm having strange performance problems with samba and an application written with VisualFox Pro. This application is entirely installed in a Windows share and it has a hystory of strange phenomenons. Initially it ran fast on an old NT server (but that server has been replaced). It has strange performance problems with Windows 2000 Server: it runs fast with some servers and slow with

I'm hoping someone has some insight into a problem I'm currenty having, which is: No one is able to edit (in place) documents with Word 2000 on a samba (2.2.6) disk share. A user can open word and save a document to the share, but when they go to edit the document Word says "Word cannot complete the save due to a file permission error". From Microsoft KB Q211632 it appears

--==>> OFFICE WATCH <<==-- The Microsoft Office newsletter from Woody's Watch. Your independent source for MS Office advice and news since 1996 9 March 2005 Vol 10 No 9 New! "The Desktop Search Handbook" - http://shop.woodyswatch.com/dsh/ @@@ Recover lost emails at http://ref.OfficeRecovery.com/?wow @@@ MailRecovery suites retrieve emails from

Le 21/11/2019 ? 15:46, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 21/11/2019 14:33, Julien TEHERY via samba wrote: >> Le 21/11/2019 ? 15:15, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>> On 21/11/2019 14:00, Julien TEHERY via samba wrote: >>>>> Not entirely sure, but why does 'Administrator' own something on a >>>>> Unix machine, it should be

Hi all I am fairly new to samba and XP. I have a client who we set up a samba server for, they are complaining about documents taking about 30 secs -2-3mins to open but only sometimes (it can be very frequent). I have seen this and captured a piece of the log file I wonder if any one can make any sense of it... I have been looking on the net and trying various things all day but to no avail...

Hi team, I've got a problem with a WinXP client being unable to save a document to a Samba share. The server is running 2.2.6pre2 (on FreeBSD 4.6). The XP client hangs for a VERY long time when attempting to save a file (at least the first file saved - the problem seems to diminish for subsequent saves/files). Turning the debug level to 3 produces the following messages (repeated many many

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ******************************************************************** The contents of this email are intended exclusively for the addressee. If you are not the addressee you must not read use or disclose the email contents ; you should notify us immediately [ by clicking "Reply" ] and delete this email. Nationwide monitors e-mails to ensure its systems

linux 2.2.19/rh6x I use in a share veto files = /.*/ whenever you connect to it the client process hangs, the smbd starts consuming cpu time and cannot be killed but with "kill -9". This is the last part of the smbd log [2002/05/16 05:49:51, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(319) 3 user groups: 100 6 19 [2002/05/16 05:49:51, 3] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2findfirst(863)

Hello, I'm trying to use samba (Version 2.2.3a-6 for Debian) as a DC for a windows 2000 pro network. Everything seems to work OK, except the roaming profiles. Every few days (I haven't locked down a pattern yet) all machines connected to the server loose their connection, and no one can connect again until the server is rebooted. I'm using log level 3, and this is what log.smbd

Hi folks, I've got a serious problem with samba since I upgrade an stone-age caldera-box with a 2.0.x-samba to redhat-7.2 with 2.2.1a-samba. I can create, delete directories and files without any problems. But renaming them (i.e. by creating a new folder which has new folder as default) does not work. I always get an error, that the file does not exist. I am trying from a win2k-professional

I've learned a fair bit since putting together my essay on the States' proposed remedies. In particular, Microsoft's response to the States was enlightening; it pointed out the parts of the Court of Appeals ruling that need to be heeded when fashioning a remedy. I now feel that the States' proposal has little chance of being accepted by the judge. The Proposed Final Judgment