Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Wierd problem with file sharing over internet."
2016 Sep 20
3
Windows 10 update kills samba access
I have been accessing Windows shares on Windows 7 and 10. However, the
update last month seems to have killed samba access. The shares are
accessible in Windows. Any idea why samba no longer works with W10 and
what can be done about the problem? I'm running openSUSE 13.1. I have
enabled the firewall rule as describe here, but it doesn't help, nor
does turning off the firewall.
tnx jk
2005 Jun 04
1
Unable to browse XP directory
I'm trying to access a share on an XP Home system, from SuSE 9.3, using
Samba. When I use Konqueror to browse, I can't see anything under the
shared directory (D:\), though I can see the contents of the
"SharedDocs" folder. If I mount the XP share manually, I can then see
all the files. Any idea, why Konqueror can't browse that directory?
tnx jk
2003 Jul 24
1
tinc under Windows
Hello everyone,
Last week the CVS version of tinc gained the ability to run under
Windows, in a Cygwin environment (http://www.cygwin.com), making use of
the virtual network driver from the CIPE project
(http://cipe-win32.sourceforge.net/). Preparations were also being made
to support Windows without Cygwin.
Today James Yonan of OpenVPN (http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/) anounced a
port of
2003 Nov 10
1
OT: Work offer - SAMBA consultant required in Sydney, Australia.
Hi all - sorry for the off-topic posting - just that the list of consultants on the samba site is horrendously out of date! I thought that this would be the best place for me to find suitable resources...
firstly I would like to say thanks a million to all the samba team for your ongoing efforts and great product. I just wish I had more time to experiment with it!
We have the startings of a good
2005 May 26
1
Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>
> Agreed. But note that the standards are set long before that...
??? By "standard" what do you mean. ???
Linux's history has been notorious for variance from ANSI, NIST, POSIX
and GNU standards. Yes, far less than Microsoft and even some UNIX
vendors, but there are still major issues today with this.
When developers try
2003 Sep 15
3
Tinc for WIndows
Hello,
I have running tinc on my several linux boxes and now I am trying to install tinc on my WinXP box.
I can't understand what kind of VPN interface I should install - CIPE or TAP which included into the windows tinc package ?
Another question is about variable "Interface =" in the tinc.conf file. What name should I use ?
Regards,
Igor Belokopytov
Tinc: Discussion
2003 Sep 26
2
outbound IAX calls bog down DSL
Evening,
I've got * asterisk up and running with nufone account for inbound and
outbound calls from the world... everything works quite nicely except that I
noticed last night that when I have a call active from * to nufone, web
surfing on the network slows to a crawl... additionally, I have a VPN tunnel
to another office (using CIPE) and while inter-office (i.e. - SIP to SIP)
calls
2005 May 25
1
Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>
> Yes, but... whose choice was it to ship 2.6 with lots of broken
> and omitted stuff when 2.4 works better for many things?
Again, 2-2-2, 6-6-6
At some point, Red Hat has to start the new series for "early adopters."
That means being the first to adopt the new GLibC, GCC, kernel, etc...
Looking at just the GLibC 2+ generations
2004 Aug 20
2
[kernel-2.4.21-15] rebuild problem
Hello,
Sorry if this mail would have to be post in the development ML, but my
problem is just at using centOS..
I'm trying to recompile the centOS-3.1 kernel.
I done this:
# cd /usr/src/linux-2.4
# make menuconfig
< i select my CPU type >
< Exit and save >
# make dep
# make modules
(...no errors ...)
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include -Wall
2005 Nov 24
1
ip route mpath rr problem
Hi list,
I have tried google but just cant get this to work or figure it out.
My setup
========
vanilla 2.6.13 kernel with
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_WRANDOM=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_DRR=y
My configuration:
A host with two ppp links.
Ontop of these two ppp dialup
2004 Jun 22
6
Linux choices ?
First of all, My apologies for this maybe slight OT post, but I have
so much confidence and read so much good replies on this list, that I
am still asking my question.
I''m looking for a linux distribution to use on our school''s homemade
routers. The routers are small miniITX based systems with 2 network
interfaces. I added a 4 port D-Link network card in some cases, when I
2005 May 30
2
Re: CentOS and SL, together? -- attributing statements to me (that I didn't make)
From: Dag Wieers
> Bryan, stop generalising and dramatising.
What dramatising? At some point, several people decide that anything they dislike was said by me.
Several other people said far more negative comments about CIPE than myself.
Those comments have now been attributed to me.
I purposely avoided making it about whether or not CIPE should or shouldn't not be included, just why it
2002 Jun 15
1
RES: ADVANCED ROUTING USING IPROUTE2 -> Multiple Firewalls
Hi William. Thanks a lot for your help.
Im having some trouble recompiling my kernel after a installed the
patch.
Im running RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3.
The patch I installed is routes-2.4.16-6.diff. I got no errors
installing it.
I added the multipath support, and recompiled it.
The make dep and the make bzImage went fine.
I got error during the make modules.
These are the errors:
2005 May 26
1
About tunnels
Hi folks,
I have two CentOS 4 server I administrate doing routing and
firewalling of two networks (one NATed and firewalled and the other one
merely firewalled) and I'd like to build a tunnel to allow computers on
the normal private network (and the firewall) to access the private IPs of
computers behind the NAT/firewall.
ie.
ALPHA BETA
10.0.0.0/8 - CentOS4
2004 Jan 21
3
[Bug 792] mtu and NAT wrong solution
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792
Summary: mtu and NAT wrong solution
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P4
Component: Miscellaneous
AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy:
2003 Oct 30
7
default route
Hi,
Is it possible to use more than one default route? I believe yes.
Any comments on them. If I use more than one, where will the trafficc be
diverted from?
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
For GNU/Linux Success Stories and Articles visit:
http://payal.staticky.com
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
2003 Oct 08
0
ADSL with PPP failover
Hi - I''ve been looking around for simple answers to this for a while now,
but haven''t been able to find any HOW-TO type documentation. I am
administering a site with a remote location connected primarily via a cipe
tunnel over a SHDSL connection. We also have a direct PSTN connection
between the sites. Seeing as phone calls here are not timed I plan to keep
the PSTN connection
2003 Aug 17
1
pre-newbie - some basic questions...
Hello All,
Been completely obsessed for the last two days with VoIP and Asterisk - running on 2 hours sleep and coffee - sorry if this is a little scattered...
Okay, I've got a small start-up company that installs traditional PBX (Nortel mainly) systems, data network infrastructure, commercial audio/video, residential audio/video/voice/data and we do lighting control systems...
I've
2005 May 25
2
Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>
> I'm still wondering about that... If anyone except Linus himself
> even suggested that changing kernel interfaces in a way that would
> break device drivers was a good thing, I can't imagine the reaction.
> I could see that the changes through 2.4 were improving things, but
> is there anything that is measurably better in
2007 May 29
6
Deterioration with zfs performace and recent zfs bits?
Has anyone else noticed a significant zfs performance deterioration
when running recent opensolaris bits?
My 32-bit / 768 MB Toshiba Tecra S1 notebook was able to do a
full opensolaris release build in ~ 4 hours 45 minutes (gcc shadow
compilation disabled; using an lzjb compressed zpool / zfs on a
single notebook hdd p-ata drive).
After upgrading to 2007-05-25 opensolaris release bits