similar to: ext3fs and 2.4.14 kernel

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "ext3fs and 2.4.14 kernel"

2001 Nov 07
3
Problem with 2.4.14 and 9.15-2414
I just upgraded to kernel 2.4.14 and applied the ext3 patch ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz. It appears (to me) that the patch breaks the loop block device module (loop.o). The problem is that the call to deactivate_page is unresolved. The routine used to be defined in swap.c. It looks like it no longer exists in 2.4.14. I'm not a kernel programmer so if I'm mistaken, sorry. I do get an
2001 Nov 06
2
2.2.14 integration with lvs
Hi, I had to modify 2 files to integrate ext3 patch with lvs patch.. (ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p8.gz and ipvs 0.8.2) --- drivers/block/loop.c.orig Tue Nov 6 10:13:48 2001 +++ drivers/block/loop.c Tue Nov 6 10:17:55 2001 @@ -218,14 +218,16 @@ static int lo_send(struct loop_device *l index++; pos += size; UnlockPage(page); -
2001 Nov 07
1
Error compiling 2.4.14 with ext3 patch
Please CC me as I'm not subscribed. Attached is my kernel configuration. Please forgive me if this is being asked a gazillion times in the list. I'm using the 2.4.14 patch found at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ . ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux-2.4.14/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \
2001 Nov 14
1
unresolved symbols in loop
Hello, i have downloaded the kernel 2.4.14 and the correspondig ext3 patch ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz. After this i extract the archiv at /usr/src, renamed the dir linux to linux-2.4.14 and made a symlink linux-2.4. I changed to the directory linux-2.4 and add the patch as decsribed on the website gunzip < ~/ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz | patch -p1. There was no error and the patch was successful.
2001 Nov 06
1
2.4.14 patch
Hey, Thanks for sending me the patch Wiktor, but I was looking for the patch ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz . If someone has that let me know. Does it work well with kernel 2.4.14 (any installation issues ?) . Why can't I download from http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3 page. If someone can zip the gz patch and email it to me that would be awesome. My email client acts up sometimes.
2001 Nov 27
1
ext3fs patch for 2.4.16 kernel?
This maybe early, but is there an ext3fs patch for the 2.4.16 kernel -- also, in general where does one download the lastest ext3fs patches?? I found the 2.4.14 patch a few weeks ago on in the linux.org UK site, but all the patches appear to be taken off that site...Any help would be most appreciated... Thanks, Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 Nov 16
2
ext3 patch files
Hi, i'd like to upgrade my kernel to 2.4.14. I've obtained the corresponding kernel patch from http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ however when I run gunzip < ~/ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz | patch -p1 I am told that this file is not in gzip format. This is based on the file and instructions on ext3 for 2.4 site. Am I missing something? cheers Simon
2016 Dec 06
5
Netlogon stoped working
Hello, I use Samba 4.4.7 on a Debian testing with bind9.9.5_DLZ. I have a DC and a test-station windows7. The execution of the login.bat was working fine and it stopped working suddently. Here is my krb5.conf : [libdefaults] default_realm = MYDOMAIN.XXX.XXX dns_lookup_realm = false dns_lookup_kdc = true Here is my smb.conf : [global] netbios name = MAMACHINE realm = MONDOMAIN.XXX.XXX
2001 Nov 06
3
invalidate: busy buffer
Hi, Since upgrading to 2.4.14 with the ext3 patch, I've been getting the following on bootup: VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. change_root: old root has d_count=5 Trying to unmount old root ... invalidate: busy buffer invalidate: busy buffer invalidate: busy buffer invalidate: busy buffer invalidate: busy buffer okay Is the invalidate busy buffer bit anything to worry about?
2001 Nov 07
2
Some kind of bug ? anyway
Tried to convert a 60 gig ext2 disk to ext3. Used tune2fs version 1.22 (it said). The filesystem refused to be converted with that version. Upgraded to 1.25 of e2fsprogs and the problem went away. My two cents. /Benjamin
2001 Sep 24
7
ext3 and kernel 2.4.10
Good morning, I try to use the last release of ext3 patch with a 2.4.10 linux kernel. I have two troubles : - when the kernel is booting, I receive : NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. Freeing unused kernel memory: 208k freed Adding Swap: 128480k swap-space (priority -1) Adding Swap: 128480k swap-space (priority -2) Why my root
2003 Jan 16
1
RE: ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in director ies?
Didn't hear back from anyone regarding if there is a way to determine if I am running the ext3fs with htree. Is there a way I can do it without checking the src code since I am running the precompired redhat kernel with 8.0? Perhaps an entry under /proc somewhere? Pj -----Original Message----- From: Parker Johnson Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:34 PM To: 'Andreas Dilger';
2003 Mar 27
2
So, what about stable quota support in ext3fs?
Good evening. We have some heavy-loaded servers on ext2, and we want to migrate to ext3fs. But we need full and stable quota support. I have headrd that there are some problems in quota usage under ext3fs. Is it true? Should we decline the ext3 usage as impossible in our servers? We need high-level stability in our server (hosting). Thanks before. -- Best regards,
2003 Jan 16
0
RE: ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in director
I'm NOT the authority here, but AFAIK, Htree is presently available only as a patch for 2.4 kernels (which includes RH8). I think that Htree was still beta code at the time RH8 was frozen (and may still be, from RedHat's perspective). I do not have the impression that the Htree patch has been applied in any standard RedHat kernels or kernel updates. I hope I am wrong, and that
2001 Dec 30
1
Ext3fs performance/kjournald deadlock issue
Hi, I've got a Redhat 7.2 system: Celeron 400 512MB RAM 18GB SCSI HD (/boot (ext2fs), / (ext3fs)) 40GB IDE HD (/ (ext3fs)) I run a bunch of services on the box (apache + mod_perl, MYSQL, Samba, etc) but the system is not under heavy load. This system has performance issues reading/writing to the ext3fs filesystems. The performance issues cropped up when I installed Redhat 7.2. Previously
2003 Jan 14
0
RE: ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in director ies?
Andreas was kind enough to point out that not neccesarily all ext3fs have htrees ready to go. I am running redhat8.0 out of the box. How can I check if ext3fs with htrees is running? I can download the kernel source, but I don't know what options were used when it was built by redhat. Thanks much for all of your help. -Parker -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Dilger
2003 Jan 14
3
ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in directories?
I am trying to determine the optimal filesystem for accessing large numbers of files (25,000+) in a single directory. I have read that ext3fs uses a sequential search algorithm and wanted to verify that this was still indeed the case since this article was published a year ago. http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=1154 <http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=1154&nIdPage=7>
2001 Aug 07
1
ext3fs for 2.4.5
Hi, I have ext3 installed against the 2.2.19 kernel. I am able to make the ext3 file system and mount it. I am not able to install the ext3fs for kernel-2.4.5 . I am unable to add the ext3 patch to the kernel. In the directory ~andrewm/linux/ext3/, which is the patch for 2.4.5 kernel. ( I can only see the patches for 2.4.6 and 2.4.7 ). Also, is there any prescribed pattern for
2008 Jul 28
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5637] New: Match case issue on ext3fs and ARM platform
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5637 Summary: Match case issue on ext3fs and ARM platform Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: bugzilla@substring.ch
2003 Apr 09
1
simple ext3fs question.
Does redhat 9 come with htree optimizations for ext3fs?