similar to: Your command, Re: Your application, was invalid

OpenPGP Public Key Server For questions or comments regarding this key server site, contact PGP Key Server Administrator <pks@gpg.cz> Current version: 0.9.4+patch2+JHpatch2 NOTE! This service is provided to facilitate public-key cryptography for demonstration and educational purposes. It is the responsibility of users of public-key cryptography to ensure that their activities conform to

OpenPGP Public Key Server For questions or comments regarding this key server site, contact PGP Key Server Administrator <pks@gpg.cz> Current version: 0.9.4+patch2+JHpatch2 NOTE! This service is provided to facilitate public-key cryptography for demonstration and educational purposes. It is the responsibility of users of public-key cryptography to ensure that their activities conform to

OpenPGP Public Key Server For questions or comments regarding this key server site, contact PGP Key Server Administrator <pks@gpg.cz> Current version: 0.9.4+patch2+JHpatch2 NOTE! This service is provided to facilitate public-key cryptography for demonstration and educational purposes. It is the responsibility of users of public-key cryptography to ensure that their activities conform to

OpenPGP Public Key Server For questions or comments regarding this key server site, contact PGP Key Server Administrator <pgp-public-keys@pca.dfn.de> Current version: 0.9.6 NOTE! This service is provided to facilitate public-key cryptography for demonstration and educational purposes. It is the responsibility of users of public-key cryptography to ensure that their activities conform to

Hi there, I guess I found a bug in many versions of samba: When I do: smbclient //localhost/incoming get filename It results like this: getting file \filename of size 838656 as filename (75.0 kb/s) (average 75.2 kb/s) ... or similar LOW speed. Something similar has been described at lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2002-May/044345.html Well, I tested these at 3 different machines Linux 2.4.21

I have read the migration docs. They seem to relate to migrating from one imap product to dovecot on the same server. I'm interested in migrating my Maildir-formatted email from one server to another. 1. Can I tar my ~/mail directory on serverX.com, untar it on a different physical serverY.com (initially with a different domain name), and still see my mail when I access imap.serverY.com

Hi, With reference to Andrew Kohlsmith's problem with calls over IAX2 going dead after 1minute 5 seconds: This is caused by a bug in the "optimized bridging" code in chan_iax2.c interacting badly with the IAX2 jitter buffer. This problem only affect calls where: 1) There are 2 or more servers doing optimised bridging between the end-points of the call. ie a call like A-end

I am currently in the progress of testing the replacement of a Windows 2003 DC with a Samba4-based one. In the DNS of old Windows DC we had CNAME entries to alias www.domain.com to serverX.domain.com and ftp.domain.com to serverY.domain.com. This is working and can be tested successfully with dig The CNAME entries were correctly replicated across to the internal DNS server on the new Samba4 DC

Hi, I can no longer connect to Dovecot (IMAP). The connection is terminated by Dovecot after Client Helo. My server: Dovecot 2.3.3 Debian buster/sid Architecture: ppc My problems started in late August after upgrading Dovecot. SSL settings: ssl_dh = </etc/ssl/dh2048.pem ssl_min_protocol = TLSv1.2 ssl_cipher_list =

Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:45:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Seymour <jseymour@LinxNet.com> Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Stop Using relays.osirusoft.com *NOW*! jseymour@LinxNet.com

Hi All, So I tried to upgrade to 2.5.2p2 today. Got this when I stopped/started sshd: Disabling protocol version 2. Could not load host key Re-installed 2.3.0p1 and all was well again. This look familiar to anybody? Thanks, Jim -- Jim Seymour | PGP Public Key available at: jseymour at jimsun.LinxNet.com | http://www.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/pks-commands.html

On 03-Dec-97 samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 14:44:27 +0100 > From: Steinar Kaaro <Steinar.Kaaro@ub.ntnu.no> > To: samba@samba.anu.edu.au > Subject: Too many users for samba? > Message-ID: <199712031344.OAA21708@serv1.ub.ntnu.no> > > Hi, > I've been running a Linux machine (RedHat 4.1 kernel 2.0.27) > with Samba 1.9.16p9 (built by

> Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 18:36:52 +0000 > From: Michael Anderson <mka@gto1.telmex.net.mx> > To: samba@samba.org > Subject: Advice needed for samba for school use > Message-ID: <37333257.7850176F@gto1.telmex.net.mx> > > Hi: > > I'm setting-up samba 2.0.0 on linux 2.2.1 as a file/print server > for a group of 24 Win98 machines in a mixed-age (K-12)

On 09-Sep-98 samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 08:48:24 +0200 > From: franca@provincia.torino.it (Franca Vercellone) I'll answer this in English (I speak and read Italian, but writing is another matter ;-) > > HO un problema grandissimo. > Tutte le volte che il server sul quale e' configurato samba reboostrappa, > non si riesce piu' a

I have a problem with new version (1.9.18p8) of SAMBA and username mapping. Configuration: WindowsNT 4.0 Workstation + SP1 WindowsNT domain - NTEP01 is PDC Digital UNIX 3.2C Username on NT: Babor Username on UNIX: baborl In SMB.CONF I have following lines: [global] security = server password server = NTEP01 username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map username.map: baborl = babor

So, given what I've read in the documentation I would create a text file named document_database.txt that might have the following: remote 192.168.1.10:30000 chert /var/lib/xapian_database/segment1 remote 192.168.1.10:30000 chert /var/lib/xapian_database/segment2 remote 192.168.1.10:30000 chert /var/lib/xapian_database/segment3 etc. I would then in my PHP program open

Hello, after upgrade Samba from 1.9.17p4 to 2.0.7 I have problems with name mangling. Changed parameters in SMB.CONF for new version: oplocks = no client code page = 852 local master = yes all other parameters are the same. I one directory I have these files: 0011_BAR_ISSUEAGRES.CSV 0011_MIR_STKGEN.CSV 0011_OLO_ISSUEMPSPEC.CSV 0011_RET_ISSUEAGRES.CSV When I look to these files (DIR /X) from

> Date: 30 Nov 1998 20:22:27 GMT > From: mathog@seqaxp.bio.caltech.edu > To: mlist-samba@nntp-server.caltech.edu > Subject: W95/98 connect to any SMB share as another user? > Message-ID: <73uuq3$s7j@gap.cco.caltech.edu> > > map H: as \\machine1\share1 as username=John, password=JohnsPassword map > M: as \\machine2\share2 as username=Jane, password=JanesPassword >

> > Shot in the dark here: > > What are you using for the sharenfs value on the ZFS filesystem? Something like rw=.mydomain.lan ? They are IP blocks or hosts specified as FQDNs, eg., pptank/home/tcrane sharenfs rw=@192.168.101/24,rw=serverX.xx.rhul.ac.uk:serverY.xx.rhul.ac.uk > > I''ve had issues where a ZFS server loses connectivity to the primary DNS server and

I have a problem getting spamd and sendmail (both stock CentOS4 rpms) to work together on a couple of smtp relay machines. This is clearly a configuration issue and no doubt revolves around my lack of comprehension of how this is to work. Basically, the setup consists of two frontend public smtp transports that redirect all email through a firewall to an internal imap server for final