similar to: Weird samba problems / more info

Hi, some days ago i sent a mail regarding a small samba installation with periodically dying nmbds. Since the customer didn't call again regarding these problems I had the opinion that everything is fine .... Today the customer called and mentioned that there are additional problems. He had fixed the nmbd problem everyday by rebooting .... :-) Now the smbds also start to die. Again no

The second instance of Quickbooks shows a "file may be corrupt" message. 56310 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /MY_REALLY_LONG_PATH/My File.QBW Thu Mar 3 19:42:20 2005 56310 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH / MY_REALLY_LONG_PATH/My File.QBI Thu Mar 3 19:42:20 2005 It works on Windows - just copied the same file to a network mapped windows

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] Frequent crashes - drives me nuts ..... Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:49:23 +0200 From: Peter Eckhardt <peter@dadi-linux.de> To: Wolfram Quester <wquester@mittelerde.physik.uni-konstanz.de> References: <3F3C93A7.6020502@dadi-linux.de> <20030815123417.GA16807@pippin> Wolfram Quester wrote: > Hi Peter, > >

----------- [2000/08/01 18:18:47, 3] smbd/reply.c: reply_sesssetup_and_X(805) Domain=[WORKGROUP] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] My Notes -------- The domains are different, which may interfere. Infernix, they are really the same machine, aren't they? [ Yes, I set my domain to Workgroup in both Windows 98 and Windows 2000. However, since Windows 2000 cannot login to the

Hi there, I recently posted about problems with winbind resolving names from ADS. We have an ADS Domain Controller serving the domain MED-DUS and an NT 4 PDC serving the domain MEDOIL. We want to use a samba server as memberserver in the MED-DUS domain. I joined the samba server to the MED-DUS domain. The domain join worked ok. All users (including MEDOIL) are visible. Next i started winbind.

Hi, i have compiled astersik using todays cvs. Worked like a charm. Asterisk runs when the oss module is enabled but crashes badly with alsa. [res_musiconhold.so] => (Music On Hold Resource) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/musiconhold.conf': Found == Registered application 'MusicOnHold' == Registered application 'WaitMusicOnHold' == Registered application

Hello, i just got asterisk up and working (without alsa). Looks really promising. Now i have some questions regarding hardware I have the following setup PSTN --- serveral ------------PBX (Asterisk) ------- digital phones PRI (S2M) Ports analog phones VoIP On the PSTN side i could use Eicon/DIVA

Hi, i've already setup lots of samba boxes. Mostly large servers as PDC's or as domain members in large networks. No real problems far. A friend asked me to update a small network (3 Win 98 boxes and two Win 2000 boxes) from samba 2.0.6 on an ancient version of linux to samba on suse 8.2. The Win98 boxes use a login script to get their shares mounted the Win 2000 boxes have their shares

server machine or OS, just the samba stuff and some interaction with 98/ME and apparently 2000 in my testing. Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Allison" <jeremy@valinux.com> To: "cpctc" <cpctc@vt.edu> Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 2:59 AM Subject: Re: samba transmits only one packet per second > On Sat, Jul 14,

Hello, I'm running a samba 3.0.14a server in production on a fedora core 3 (kernel 2.6.9-1.667smp) with a least 250 clients (XP Pro SP2) (up to 400 sometimes). A few days ago, a problem appeared with a soft that we are using for a long time. (Petit Robert, a french dictionnary). When someone launch the dictionnary, many clients are freezed when they try to access to the "start

I've used oplocks = no for a long time now, because of the famous "oplock_break" error, but I decided to give 2.0.7 a try. I still get "oplock break" errors as before, but this time I got a new error too: [2000/05/02 10:04:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(976) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file XXXXX/xxxxxx/mailbox.pst

I'm having a problem with files locking so that every time the are opened up they are opened as Read-Only. Windows doesn't see them as readonly but Samba thinks that they are write=no and so they can't be saved or deleted. I've included a log, my smb.conf, and a getfacl of a user's home directory as well as a getfacl of the directory from /home. Any help would be

Dear All, we've been having some intermittent problems with students who's home directories are on a Sun E450 running Samba 2.0.6. I'm not totally convinced that the problem is caused by the server, but may be the network. However, I've had a look at the log.smb file and I'm seeing some error messages that I've not come across before: [2001/02/23 18:20:40, 0]

Using Samba 1.9.18p10 I have found a difference between Win95 and WinNT: opening 'Lotus Freelance' files from Win95 is really slow (about 17 kB/s only) vs fast (~hundreds of kB/s) from WinNT. Looking into the log (with debug level=4) I see using Win95: switch message SMBopenX (pid 33994) Skipping become_user - already user unix_clean_name [./PRIVATE/Goyal_Sep98.PRZ] Got dir cache hit on

Hi, This weekend I migrated a samba-server to new hardware and software : I'm running samba 3.2.7-11.3.2 on Opensuse 11.1. Everything works fine I believe except for an old DOS-application, written in Clipper. It's too slow to be usable. I tried to debug this but I'm stuck. I put the loglevel to 10, but I can't see anything wrong. I first added to veto oplock files :

We are trying to troubleshoot slow performance. A lot of my NT client log files show messages like this about oplock break issues. [2003/10/09 12:50:39, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1008) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 2907 on port 61752 for dev = 40240002, inode = 29, file_id = 2 64 [2003/10/09 12:51:03, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(395) process_local_message:

I just noticed that, when testing Lexware[1] with wine, that winetricks does not seem to reset the windows version correctly (or at least the Service Pack Number). On a fresh wine-installation I executed: winetricks msxml3 jet40 mdac28 dotnet20 When I now start the Lexware-Installer it says that "SP4" is installed (so it seems to be the setting for Windows 2000), but winecfg shows

I've got an aggravating problem as described in the subject line above. I have a small home network with a Linux box running Samba and acting as both local and domain master browser and WINS server. Also on the network are a desktop PC (Dell 1.4 GHz P4) running Windows 2000 Professional and a laptop running Windows XP Professional. The problem occurs when I try to copy a file over 1 MB

Hello! I'm running Samba 2.2.8a on top of a ext3 filesystem with ACLs enabled. (kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r2) With ACLs disabled (i.e., mount /dev/hdd1 /mnt/floppy (no -o ACL)), the Security box under windows 2000 works like I want it to with respect to the Everyone group; If I want the Linux permissions to be, say, 770 (rwxrwx---), I can select everyone and hit "Remove." The everyone

Can i run asterisk on a openvz vps or do i need a kernel? I dont use dadi