similar to: samba-3.0rc1 Can access PDC but not others

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "samba-3.0rc1 Can access PDC but not others"

2003 Mar 19
2
WINBIND with usernames with &
Samba doesn't allow connections from usernames that have & in them. For example, using 2.2.5 and winbind with security = DOMAIN password server = win2kmixed workgroup = MIXEDDOMAIN all my users can login, (for example MIXEDDOMAIN+aho, MIXEDDOMAIN+tdickson), but my users named "&" and "bobalso&" (which should be MIXEDDOMAIN+& and MIXEDDOMAIN+bobalso&)
2010 Mar 10
3
Help with aggregate and cor
Hello, I do not understand the correct way to approach the following problem in R. I have observations of pairs of variables, v1, o1, v2, o2, etc, observed every 30 seconds. What I would like to do is compute the correlation matrix, but not for all my data, just for, say 5 minutes or 1 hour chunks. In sql, what I would say is select id, date_trunc('hour'::text, ts) as tshour,
2011 Mar 30
0
offset in gam
Hi, we are modelling dusky grouper distribution using underwater visual census. Our response variable is the abundance of groupers but we want to see differences in habitat related to maturity because dusky groupers use different habitats when they're juveniles versus adults. So we're using the % of maturity. ie 1 individual that is 50cm TL gets aprox 0.5 (50% chances to be mature and 50%
2004 Nov 11
5
wrong answer for simple expressions
I am experiencing strange (to me) output when trying to do simple calculations. Expressions that should equal zero yield non-zero values. Examples: > a <- 4.1-3.1 > b <- 5.1-4.1 > a-b [1] -4.440892e-16 > (4.1-3.1)-(5.1-4.1) [1] -4.440892e-16 When this last expression is expanded, I get the right answer: > 4.1-3.1-5.1+4.1 [1] 0 I am using the binary packaged version
2003 Aug 25
1
is it possible to migrate to samba and keep existing SIDs?
Hello, I am using smaba-3.0beta3 on linux (RedHat 7.3). I noticed that 'net rpc vampire' does not retrieve the existing SIDs from the domain PDC, rather it creates new ones. This is a problem if users have files saved locally on their NT workstations, as the SIDs won't match after the migration to samba PDC. Is there a way to migrate from an NT PDC to a samba one and still
2006 Dec 23
1
Question regarding window output extents
Hi, in a plugin I am developing with some other people (namely: tabbed window grouper), we want to paint a glow like effect around the windows. This is done by adding the glow as "second decoration" around the window decoration. The question now is: How can we communicate the fact that there is a second set of decoration properly to other plugins so that window damaging and
2006 Jun 27
1
Post this please
Post the following please. Thanks! Voxura, an internet video sharing startup, is looking for a skilled and motivated Web User Interface Developer to work with us in building our video sharing products and features. You will work with a strong, creative team building features used by people every day. Our team is looking for a Web User Interface Developer with in-depth knowledge of web
2005 Jun 22
2
Trouble with ifelse and if statement (PR#7962)
Full_Name: Woolton Lee Version: 2.1 OS: windows Submission from: (NULL) (128.118.224.46) I did the following ('g' and 'h' are both numeric vectors) > i <- abs(g-h) creating a vector 'i' with values, > i [1] 0.08 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.20 0.00 0.13 Now, I want to create a new vector =1 whenever 'i' = 0.33 and =0
2010 May 19
3
offset in gam and spatial scale of variables
Hi, We are analizing the relationship between the abundance of groupers in line transects and some variables. We are using the quasipoisson distribution. Do we need to include the length of the transects as an offset if they all have the same length?? Also, can we include in the gam models variables that are measured at different spatial scales? We have done an analysis to see what variables
2003 Jul 14
6
bug?
Dear R programmers, is there a sensible explanation for the following behaviour? The second command seems not to be interpreted correctly. > seq(0.6, 0.9, by=0.1) == 0.8 [1] FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE > seq(0.7, 0.9, by=0.1) == 0.8 [1] FALSE FALSE FALSE > c(0.7, 0.8, 0.9) == 0.8 [1] FALSE TRUE FALSE > seq(0.9, 0.7, by=-0.1) == 0.8 [1] FALSE TRUE FALSE I am running R version 1.7.1 on
2011 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc1 Testing Begins!
Have you a command line to do an anonymous Subversion checkout of the 3.0rc1 tag? Or should I just stick with the official tarball? -- Don Quixote de la Mancha Dulcinea Technologies Corporation Software of Elegance and Beauty http://www.dulcineatech.com quixote at dulcineatech.com
2011 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc1 Testing Begins!
Hi Bill, Do we have a list of which PRs have been filed that are considered release blockers? -Jim On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi all, > > Testing for LLVM 3.0 release candidate 1 is now under way! We will soon have binaries available for you to download and try. Those who would like to compile things and try them out for themselves can grab the source
2003 Aug 19
2
Error joining samba 3.0rc1 domain
I get the following error trying to join domain: The following error occured attempting to join the domain "SAMBA": No mapping between account named and security ID's was done. The following is my smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SAMBA server string = Samba Server passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap.server username map =
2011 Oct 17
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc1 Testing Begins!
Hi all, Testing for LLVM 3.0 release candidate 1 is now under way! We will soon have binaries available for you to download and try. Those who would like to compile things and try them out for themselves can grab the source tarballs here: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/ A Word About Patches I neglected to send out instructions on how to get patches into the LLVM 3.0 branch. All patches must
2011 Oct 21
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc1 Testing Begins!
Not yet. That is, I don't think any have been filed at all for 3.0. I don't know whether to be happy or worried. :-) Any that are regressions should be marked with the 'regression' keyword and be a release blocker. -bw On Oct 20, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Do we have a list of which PRs have been filed that are considered release blockers?
2003 Aug 23
1
locking in samba
Hello! I've got into problems with simultaneous access to files on samba server. Two (or more) people from different computers may open the same file and may independently change it (with openoffice, for example). Certainly, this is not the expected behavior. If the file is shared on windows machine, when the first user opens it, he gots RW permission, while the next one(s) may open this
2014 Sep 29
3
help on samba-tng
Dear all, This is an embedded firmware engineer Honey from China, and I am studying the samba and samba-tng, because the size of samba is too large to my development. I want to port the samba-tng to embedded ARM Linux system, use the kernel version is 2.6.35, but I found the samba-tng can't be compiled by cross compiler(arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc). And I can't
2003 Apr 02
2
Samba 3.0 won't join Samba-TNG domain
Hi, I posted this problem before in more detail (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=104756899022766&w=2) but received no response. At the current state of Smaba 3.0 and Samba-TNG these two seem to be incomaptible. Samba 3.0 can't join a TNG controlled domain. I think this should affect a lot of installations as TNG as a controller and "stable" as file/printserver seem
2002 Sep 10
0
Re: More on Samba 3.0 vs Samba TNG
Hi, well, I guess that this is something that I need to plan to do :-). I'm developing a plan for a group of updated docs for TNG (and Samba, compared to TNG). Quickly, you're asking for 1) A bulleted list? 2) A Kvivio flowchart? 3) Some other comparison? Could you tell me in general terms: do you need to "sell" TNG to the boss or something? I can't give it to you now.
2001 Nov 29
1
Migrating Domain from TNG to 2.2.2: A cautionary tale
Hello, We recently undertook to migrate our domain from samba-TNG to samba-2.2.2. However, it did not go smoothly. One of the main reasons is that even if you start 2.2.2 with the domain SID from the TNG installation, you find that the users' RIDs are different. This is because samba-TNG calculates the RID from the unix UID using the formula UID*4 + 1000 where as 2.2.2 uses UID*2 +1000. At