similar to: Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference intimestamphandling ?

|> mtime being changed is beyond the pale. I suspect |> ext3 is the problem. I heard some people losing all |> of their data on ext3-formatted disks. Stay away |> from it. | | Do you have some facts to back up that load of FUD? | By all accounts I've ever seen, Ext. 3 has been | stable for *long* time before it was even included | in the stock Kernel tree. Do you want to

thanks very much for your kind and fast assistance! greetings from holland. mourik jan > -----Original Message----- > From: Dragan Krnic [mailto:dkrnic@lycos.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:19 > To: mourik jan c heupink > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference in > timestamphandling? > > > > and (now that

>> > > Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. >> > >> > Why? Does reiserfs handle ctime in a different >> > way than other linux filesystems? >> >> It's not supposed to given the same instructions >> from clients but it appears to because perhaps it >> elicits different kind of response from Office. >> Maybe

Dragan, Andy Thanks for your answsers. Please find hereafter more information and my notes. Nadine ---------------------- R?achemin? par Nadine Vandois/FR/BULL sur 11/08/2003 10:56 --------------------------- "Dragan Krnic" <dkrnic@lycos.com> sur 10/08/2003 09:47:05 Veuillez r?pondre ? dkrnic@lycos.com Pour : nadine.vandois@bull.net cc : samba@lists.samba.org Objet :

>> > > ... On my PCs the mtime remains unmodified. >> > > It's a weird thing if it happens under normal >> > > circumstances ... But if it only happens when >> > > you fake the identity from within the Office >> > > programs, well, I wouldn't bother really. >> > > >> > I totally agree ! >> >>

>>>> Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. >>>> >>> But reiserfs doesn´t support ACLs. Does it? >> >> Oh yes, it does. Big way. >> > ?? > > I was under the impression that if i wanted acls, i > should use xfs, ext3 (or jsf i believe) but NOT > reisersf. > > Am I wrong? Does (for example) SuSE 8.2 with >

running echo %userprofile% from a windows command prompt will tell you exactly where your user profile is located. running set will give you all your environment settings. Jim Wharton Network Administrator Alachua County Property Appraiser jwharton@acpafl.org > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-bounces+creole3=bellsouth.net@lists.samba.org >

| We are running a samba server 2.23 on FreeBSD 4.8 | and have to open a .mdb file which nominally is no | problem (we access the file with our accounting | program and it is fine) however when I try to open | it with MS access 2002 itself I get the error that | "the file is on an unsecured server or outside the | Intranet copy the file locally to access it blah | blah" Perhaps you

> and (now that i have your attention... :)) what > software do you use to backup your reisersf/acls > partitions? Excellent question. I use tar, but before I start it I do a "getfacl --skip-base -R ." and save the output in a file that is bound to be the first on tape. When I restore such a tarball I do "setfacl --restore=" and all the ACLs are restored in a fell

John, don't be harsh with Philippe. To answer his question, you don't really need any more information than what he abundantly provided in his mailing. His problem is that he hasn't installed the ldap-devel or pam-devel or some other of the more than 100 devel packages that might be needed to compile samba with a distinctive set of --with-this-or-that options. His compiler simply

I hope Time won't take me to a CDMA court martial in Guantanamo for unfair use of your quotes, Daniel! The point is that each norm is only really valid in its original context. It is the spirit of the norm which should guide us. The idea is: you slap an unorthodox attribute onto an object to evoke any kind of practical magic and then laugh your sides off. Who cares? The same with Readonly.

|................. | This would *possibly* map to the files of your | driver like this: | | Long Printer Name:\ --> lp:\ |........................... | missing: should be "RAW" !! ##### | | Yeah, you're right. I've missed the RAW DDT. Now | when I complied I got the error from the subject | line. | | Sorry? I didn't

A trivial case: executing the following DOS command from the prompt line on a Win2K SP3: %windir%\system32\attrib.exe +R H:\dir can't set the R(eadonly) flag on my home dirs (2.2.7): drwxrwsr-x 4 me users 4096 Nov 27 17:59 . drwxr-sr-x 2 me users 4096 Nov 27 17:59 dir -r--r--r-- 1 me users 0 Nov 27 17:59 empty.txt drwxr-sr-x 2 me users 4096 Nov 27 17:27

Hi Kurt, I've read the new document. It's a very fine piece of technical documentation. However, it doesn't help me in the present predicament. Going now by this book I'm only getting more frustrated. I'm stuck! For example adding driver with rcpclient invariably ends in "Segmentation fault" (Signal 11) immediately after pop_sec_ctx, whose push counterpart was

Hello, I have installed cups on a linux server (running with RH 9.0). When executing "cupsaddsmb -a -v", I get an error: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFULL, when attemping to execute adddriver". Can someone help on the meaning of this error, and on its reason (cause) ? Please find hereafter a file with result (and the error) of this commmand "cupsaddsmb", for a printer:

We are planning to replace a quite big domain running W2K with Samba ( at the very least, the DC ). Though i'd love to have the extra security capabilities of W2K ( Kerberos ) as a DC, Samba/NT4 as PDC/BDC with ldapsam will more than suffice for now. The show-stopper right now is this: we need to be able to assign "real" Full Control permissions: a user who has "Full

Sorry, for the resend, but I found out another piece of information that may be helpful. I did a Ethereal check and then tried accessing the Samba Serve from my XP box. The Linux box got 3 NBNS Name queries on the Share Sambaserve and the response from the linux box was a ICMP saying Destination unreachable. Then 3 more NBNS broadcasts for the name query which Linux did not respond to. Thank

Hi Kurt, I've read the new document. It's a very fine piece of technical documentation. However, it doesn't help me in the present predicament. Going now by this book I'm only getting more frustrated. What are your versions of Samba, CUPS(?), OS, and Printer again? 2.2.8a, 1.1.18, SuSE 8.2 w/2.4.20-62, Lexmark C720 I'm stuck! I would

>-------- Message d'origine-------- >De: Dragan Krnic [mailto:dkrnic@lycos.com] >Date: sam. 9/13/2003 20:15 >?: J?r?me Fenal >Cc: samba@lists.samba.org >Objet: Re: Problem uploading printer driver on 2.2.8a (FreeBSD 4.8) >It's a bug. Fortunately it can be fixed by applying >a couple of patches described in > >

Hi there, i still have a weird problem with Powerpoint an Excel files stored on a Samba share. Only read on if you -use a samba share as MULTI-user file repository (no force_user etc.) -where multiple, different users share files in common directories -the modification time of a file is of any relevance to you. (seems like lots of folks don?t bother access rights or keep their information