similar to: Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference in timestamphandling?

thanks very much for your kind and fast assistance! greetings from holland. mourik jan > -----Original Message----- > From: Dragan Krnic [mailto:dkrnic@lycos.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:19 > To: mourik jan c heupink > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference in > timestamphandling? > > > > and (now that

>>>> Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. >>>> >>> But reiserfs doesn´t support ACLs. Does it? >> >> Oh yes, it does. Big way. >> > ?? > > I was under the impression that if i wanted acls, i > should use xfs, ext3 (or jsf i believe) but NOT > reisersf. > > Am I wrong? Does (for example) SuSE 8.2 with >

|> mtime being changed is beyond the pale. I suspect |> ext3 is the problem. I heard some people losing all |> of their data on ext3-formatted disks. Stay away |> from it. | | Do you have some facts to back up that load of FUD? | By all accounts I've ever seen, Ext. 3 has been | stable for *long* time before it was even included | in the stock Kernel tree. Do you want to

>> > > ... On my PCs the mtime remains unmodified. >> > > It's a weird thing if it happens under normal >> > > circumstances ... But if it only happens when >> > > you fake the identity from within the Office >> > > programs, well, I wouldn't bother really. >> > > >> > I totally agree ! >> >>

|> Do you want to say that nobody ever lost any data on |> ext3-formatted disks? Be realistic. |> |> But does it warrant my exhortation to stay away from |> it? Probably not. It was a joke without a smiley |> sign. ext3 is probably a solid, though a bit clumsy |> and slow fs. |> |> I appreciate your criticism. I jumped the same way |> when someone else used the same

>> > > Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. >> > >> > Why? Does reiserfs handle ctime in a different >> > way than other linux filesystems? >> >> It's not supposed to given the same instructions >> from clients but it appears to because perhaps it >> elicits different kind of response from Office. >> Maybe

Dragan, Andy Thanks for your answsers. Please find hereafter more information and my notes. Nadine ---------------------- R?achemin? par Nadine Vandois/FR/BULL sur 11/08/2003 10:56 --------------------------- "Dragan Krnic" <dkrnic@lycos.com> sur 10/08/2003 09:47:05 Veuillez r?pondre ? dkrnic@lycos.com Pour : nadine.vandois@bull.net cc : samba@lists.samba.org Objet :

running echo %userprofile% from a windows command prompt will tell you exactly where your user profile is located. running set will give you all your environment settings. Jim Wharton Network Administrator Alachua County Property Appraiser jwharton@acpafl.org > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-bounces+creole3=bellsouth.net@lists.samba.org >

| We are running a samba server 2.23 on FreeBSD 4.8 | and have to open a .mdb file which nominally is no | problem (we access the file with our accounting | program and it is fine) however when I try to open | it with MS access 2002 itself I get the error that | "the file is on an unsecured server or outside the | Intranet copy the file locally to access it blah | blah" Perhaps you

>> If you're looking to share the tape drive so you ................ >You could probably do something clever with a magic >script in the Samba config, but it still wouldn't >work with native Windows backup utilities. (Are >there native Windows backup utilities that can >access a remote tape drive?) You could probably get >it to work with tar under Cygwin if

>On November 28, dkrnic@t-online.de said: >> actually a second attempt at drawing your attention to the fact >> that compliance with M$ quirks and kinks is not something to be >> ashamed of but rather reason to be proud. > >I think you'll find that the Samba team are quite familiar with this >opinion, especially in the context of the Samba TNG fork :) >

I'm posting this message in charge of Denis MARS (France), because he is not a subscriber of teh list and I worked with him about the same problem. Domenico Viggiani ---------------------------------------------------------------- Hello, I worked on this problem since three weeks and now i really give up. Clearly i can't go further without your help. I hesitate to send you this bug

I was trying to improve the performance of BackupPC http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/, which uses smbclient to connect to Windows systems to backup Windows desktop systems. I'm currently running Samba 2.2.8a on a fairly beefy Solaris 9 system and only getting 200-700 KB/sec from the Windows clients. The 700 KB/sec is when I connect to a dual-Athalon 2600+ Win2K system attached to the

Program: smbtar Package: RH7.3 samba-client-2.2.7-1.7.3 Code is the same in branch SAMBA-TNG revision 1.8.2.1 and branch Main revision 1.9, and hasn't been modified for almost three years. The line numbers listed below are in referance to brance Main revision 1.9 as listed here: http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/script/smbtar?annotate=1.9 Problem: When calling smbtar with the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I just noticed a strange behavious of my smbclient which came up on debugging BackupPC. I have set up a AD Domain with an windows Server as DC. In this domain I have a laptop running which I try to backup. On the laptop I created a share called "C" and assigned access permissions for the user called "backuppc". I want

Hi, I recently upgraded to 1.9.18p8, and noticed that smbtar no longer automatically includes system files. I can't seem to find a way to include the 'tarmode system' command in the smbtar shell script. If I add a -c "tarmode system" to the $SMBCLIENT command line at the end of the smbtar shell script, I get no tarred files at all. Can anybody help me with this?

Sorry, for the resend, but I found out another piece of information that may be helpful. I did a Ethereal check and then tried accessing the Samba Serve from my XP box. The Linux box got 3 NBNS Name queries on the Share Sambaserve and the response from the linux box was a ICMP saying Destination unreachable. Then 3 more NBNS broadcasts for the name query which Linux did not respond to. Thank

I hope Time won't take me to a CDMA court martial in Guantanamo for unfair use of your quotes, Daniel! The point is that each norm is only really valid in its original context. It is the spirit of the norm which should guide us. The idea is: you slap an unorthodox attribute onto an object to evoke any kind of practical magic and then laugh your sides off. Who cares? The same with Readonly.

Hi there, i still have a weird problem with Powerpoint an Excel files stored on a Samba share. Only read on if you -use a samba share as MULTI-user file repository (no force_user etc.) -where multiple, different users share files in common directories -the modification time of a file is of any relevance to you. (seems like lots of folks don?t bother access rights or keep their information

John, don't be harsh with Philippe. To answer his question, you don't really need any more information than what he abundantly provided in his mailing. His problem is that he hasn't installed the ldap-devel or pam-devel or some other of the more than 100 devel packages that might be needed to compile samba with a distinctive set of --with-this-or-that options. His compiler simply