similar to: Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference in timestamphandling ?

> and (now that i have your attention... :)) what > software do you use to backup your reisersf/acls > partitions? Excellent question. I use tar, but before I start it I do a "getfacl --skip-base -R ." and save the output in a file that is bound to be the first on tape. When I restore such a tarball I do "setfacl --restore=" and all the ACLs are restored in a fell

thanks very much for your kind and fast assistance! greetings from holland. mourik jan > -----Original Message----- > From: Dragan Krnic [mailto:dkrnic@lycos.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:19 > To: mourik jan c heupink > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference in > timestamphandling? > > > > and (now that

>> > > Fine. Use reiserfs and don't worry about ctime. >> > >> > Why? Does reiserfs handle ctime in a different >> > way than other linux filesystems? >> >> It's not supposed to given the same instructions >> from clients but it appears to because perhaps it >> elicits different kind of response from Office. >> Maybe

Hi list, Update: originally i wanted to post a question, but in writing i thought of things that finally led me to the solution. This i wanted to share with the community in case it can help. Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I had no luck searching for it. I have a working Samba 2.2.5 installation on SuSE8.1. I have two users on a windows client called Torge (that's me) and Ga&ediaresis;lle

>> > > ... On my PCs the mtime remains unmodified. >> > > It's a weird thing if it happens under normal >> > > circumstances ... But if it only happens when >> > > you fake the identity from within the Office >> > > programs, well, I wouldn't bother really. >> > > >> > I totally agree ! >> >>

I currently us Linksys/Ciscio, Grandstream and AudioCodes ata's. none of the three perform well in all enviroments. Between stablity issues, T38 and DTMF talkoff all three suffer some combination of issues. I am looking at Patton and Innomedia. Has any one tried either brand and what is your experience with them. Which would be the base for stability, audio quality, provisioning, DTMF

We have developed rails reports and deployed in server, report have some hierarchy levels..... Initially we have less volume of data in database table and report is running with fine performance... after few months,reports get very slower, we thought that this could be because of data increased in database table ( nearly 11 lakhs of records in table)..... Then i created index and report has

On 9/25/19 12:06 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > But on the desktop, I've switched to OpenSUSE Leap, and I'm a happy > camper now. I can highly recommend it. Sports every major and minor > desktop environment under the sun, and it's a nice blend of semi-rolling > releases based on a rock-solid SLES base. > Why do you need "every major and minor desktop environment

|> mtime being changed is beyond the pale. I suspect |> ext3 is the problem. I heard some people losing all |> of their data on ext3-formatted disks. Stay away |> from it. | | Do you have some facts to back up that load of FUD? | By all accounts I've ever seen, Ext. 3 has been | stable for *long* time before it was even included | in the stock Kernel tree. Do you want to

|> Do you want to say that nobody ever lost any data on |> ext3-formatted disks? Be realistic. |> |> But does it warrant my exhortation to stay away from |> it? Probably not. It was a joke without a smiley |> sign. ext3 is probably a solid, though a bit clumsy |> and slow fs. |> |> I appreciate your criticism. I jumped the same way |> when someone else used the same

Am 25.09.19 um 08:18 schrieb Ljubomir Ljubojevic: > All I need for work that feeds me is one good work environment and that > is MATE. All tray icons are visible so I can see if message or mail > comes without need to move more then eyeball. And stablity of CentOS > makes it best option even though versions of apps are not latest and > greatest, it is enough they do the job needed.

I am currently running a Windows XP system at home with around 100+ Mb in use over ~400Mb of NTFS file systems. I am installing CentOS 4.4 on it when I change out the mobo/cpu/mem/video combo I just bought. I want to convert all the file systems to (probably) Reiserfs or maybe ext3, but I need to do them one at a time because I only have enough transfer space to accommodate the largest one, or

We are looking at implementing a Linux box running samba in the near future with about 1TB of disk online. The purpose of this box will be for basic file and printer sharing needs. I am doing research on the different journaling file systems avaible in RH 7.3 and up (ext3, reiserFS, and JFS) and was wondering if anyone has had any real world experience with them (mostly reiserFS and JFS) and

Actually, pure NVME-based volume will be waste of money. Gluster excells when you have more servers and clients to consume that data. I would choose? LVM cache (NVMEs) + HW RAID10 of SAS 15K disks to cope with the load. At least if you decide to go with more disks for the raids, use several? (not the built-in ones) controllers. @Martin, in order to get a more reliable setup, you will have to

Excerpts from Strahil Nikolov's message of 2023-03-24 21:11:28 +0000: > Gluster excells when you have more servers and clients to consume that data. you mean multiple smaller servers are better than one large server? > LVM cache (NVMEs) we only have a few clients. gluster is for us effectively only a scalable large file storage for one application. new files are written once and then

Hi, I tried to compile the 2.6.9-22.EL kernel with reiserfs enabled. make fails as follows. anyone managed to compile with reiserfs successfully? CC [M] fs/reiserfs/stree.o fs/reiserfs/stree.c: In function `get_lkey': fs/reiserfs/stree.c:322: warning: return from incompatible pointer type fs/reiserfs/stree.c:325: warning: return from incompatible pointer type fs/reiserfs/stree.c:329:

Hello, What am I missing ? thanks ! -dikshie- @fisbum:/usr/bin$ uname -a Linux fisbum 2.4.18 #3 Tue Mar 19 16:55:23 JAVT 2002 i686 unknown @fisbum:/usr/bin$ mount /dev/hda1 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro) /dev/hda3 on /usr type reiserfs (rw) /dev/hda5 on /home type reiserfs (rw,nosuid,usrquota) /dev/hda6 on /var type reiserfs (rw,usrquota) /dev/hda7 on /tmp type reiserfs (rw) /dev/hdb1

Hello, To compile a custom kernel, I downloaded 2.6.29.1 from kernel.org and followed the tutorial at: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Kernel.org_Linux_on_Xen Used a supposedly working .config file for the compilation (generated by my provider to compile his xenU kernels), set /dev/xvd* device nodes both in the domU conf file (disk, root): disk = [

Hi - Xen cannot detect a PATA drive connected to my on-board promise 20378 K8T Neon MSI mobo. When I boot using a non exen kernel, the PATA is dected accordingly. Any thoughts? Following is dmesg from a regular non-exen kernel #uname -a Linux localhost 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 #1 Sun Oct 29 14:58:57 EST 2006 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux #dmesg Bootdata ok (command

I have a disk image file that was created using dd, makereiserfs dance, operating system files copied in directly with cp -ax (vi a temporary mount, and then dismounted). My domU configuration is as follows: -------------------------------- kernel = "/RAID/data/xen/bootsles10/vmlinuz-xen" ramdisk = "/RAID/data/xen/bootsles10/initrd-xen" memory = 2048 name =