similar to: Lots of lost+found files ...

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Lots of lost+found files ..."

2001 Dec 06
0
Lots of files in lost+found ...
Hi, I've recently had a spate of filesystem errors on my laptop which is running a vanilla RedHat 7.2 (kernel 2.4.7) using the ext3 filesystem on all partitions. I have been using the laptop with no apparent problems for some time but last weekend, when I was trying to compile Evolution overnight, I hit a compile problem; it complained that a Makefile didn't exist in a script directory.
2001 Jul 27
4
ext3-2.4-0.9.4-246ac5 problem...
I've updated today the version of ext3 on my laptop (from 0.9.3 to 0.9.4) and I am unable to boot anymore (hand copy below): VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.5.0 initialized Journalling Block Device driver loaded Invalid operand: 0000 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[<c01256bf>] ... ... ... Kernel panic: attempted to kill init. Since this is my / fs, I am unable to boot anymore (and of course
2001 Jul 04
4
ext3 patch for 2.4.6 (plain or ac1)
Does the ext3 patch applies on top of the newly released 2.4.6 kernel (and/or the 2.4.6-ac1 variant) ? I want to upgrade to the new kernel and wanted to know before I run into problems if there are any known problems and if it's better to wait for an 'official' release. Thanks. Stelian. -- Stelian Pop <stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com> |---------------- Free Software Engineer
2001 Jul 13
2
0.9.2 or 0.9.3 ?
Hi, I found out that a new version of ext3-2.4 was available from the previous messages on this list, despite the fact that no 'official' announce was given... I'm currently running 0.9.1 on 2.4.6-ac2 without problems. Should I upgrade to 0.9.2 (I suppose yes by reading the changelog :-)) ? What about the 0.9.3-pre version ? What does the -pre mean exactly (any incidence on the
2001 Jul 18
3
Ok, Im an idiot. Can't remount the ext3 filesystem because I deleted the /.jounral file...
Hello everyone, Ok, I admit it - I'm an idiot. But it seemed the right thing to do at the time.... I'm running RH 6.2 with a 2.2.19ext3 (ext3 0.0.7). I wanted to try out the new 2.4 kernel line, so I upgraded modutils, gcc and few other things.. Compiled the kernel (did NOT patch it to ext3) and installed it and rebooted. Well, it didn't understand ext3 fs.. Ok... Boot back into
2004 Feb 17
1
Help with multiple graphs on one set of axis
Can you suggest code to plot two cumulative distribution functions on the same set of axis? Phillp Good "Never trust anything that can think for itself if you can't see where it keeps its brain." Mr. Weasley [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2006 Feb 08
2
lme syntax for P&B examples
Hi helpeRs, I've been working through some examples in Pinhiero & Bates( 2000) trying to understand how to translate to the new Lme4 syntax but without much luck. Below is what I think I should do, but either the answers don't come out the same or I get errors. In the Oxide problems I'm particularly interested in obtaining the levels coeficients but this options no longer seems
2006 Mar 29
1
lmer multilevel
My question relates to problems that I'm having matching lme and lmer examples in P&B. using Matix 0.995 In the Oxide example in p167-170 I can't get the level 2 coefficient estimates to match the fm1Oxide model in lme is data(Oxide,package="nlme") lme(Thickness~1,Oxide) which I translate in Lmer syntax to fm3Oxide<-lmer(Thickness~
2006 Mar 29
1
Lmer BLUPS: was(lmer multilevel)
Paul: I may have found the issue (which is similar to your conclusion). I checked using egsingle in the mlmRev package as these individuals are strictly nested in this case: library(mlmRev) library(nlme) fm1 <- lme(math ~ year, random=~1|schoolid/childid, egsingle) fm2 <- lmer(math ~ year +(1|schoolid:childid) + (1|schoolid), egsingle) Checking the summary of both models, the output is
2007 Nov 29
1
Deleting files from dump?
Is it possible to delete a file from dump? I saved it in one dump archive, and want to save space by deleting it from the others. Thanks. Scott
2001 Jul 14
0
Re: ext3-users@redhat.com
Stelian Pop wrote: > I found out that a new version of ext3-2.4 was available from > the previous messages on this list, despite the fact that > no 'official' announce was given... I thought that the message, https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2001-July/000804.html , was the official announcement. BTW, no problems here with 0.9.0. 1 week and some hours of
2016 Feb 03
3
Strange performance issue on CentOS 6.7 server
On Feb 3, 2016, at 16:13, Warren Young wrote: > A dying hard disk can do it. HDDs try to silently paper over I/O errors, but what they can?t hide is the time it takes to do this. If your HDD is constantly correcting errors at the oxide layer, it will be reeeeeallly sllllow. > > You can try running SMART tests on it, though that?s not guaranteed to show the problem. Well, it?s not ?a?
2016 Feb 03
2
Strange performance issue on CentOS 6.7 server
I?m running CentOS 6.7 on my build servers, and on one of the servers the builds are taking almost an order of magnitude longer than usual. There are no runaway processes and there is plenty of free memory. So I suspected that file I/O might be slow, and sure enough, that appears to be the case. I ran a simple dd test and compared the results to a ?normal? build server (412 MB/s vs. 31.7 MB/s).
2002 Feb 04
5
2GB of Waste? How can it be?
Dr. Tweedie, et al.: I recently formatted a partition using EXT3, and after a "df -h" I get 14GB of space. When I reformatted the partition with ReiserFS, and did a "df -h" I got 16GB of space! Now the partition was setup to be 16GB via fdisk, so 16GB is correct. However, why does EXT3 loose 2GB of space? The journals cannot be that big!?! Very Respectfully, Stuart
2012 Jul 18
4
asterisk 1.8 on Solaris/sparc
I've got the latest asterisk 1.8 running on a Netra X1 with Solaris 10 u10. The system itself is happy and phone calls (between two parties) seem fine. Unfortunately, when a caller listens to a Playback recording, there seems to be moments of stutter - perhaps 1 second of stutter for every 10 seconds of Playback. The stutter is not consistent at the same point of the playback file. To
2019 Apr 05
1
Issues when updating CentOS 7
Hi all, I wanted to update my CentOS 7 install this morning and I started getting the errors from below. Any ideas on a fix? They seem to be related to cinnamon which I actually don't use at all (the machine was prepared by our IT at work and they install both Gnome and Cinnamon by default). Since I don't use it, I guess an option would be to remove it altogether and then I will
2019 Apr 05
2
Issues when updating CentOS 7
>I wanted to update my CentOS 7 install this morning and I started>getting the errors from below. >Any ideas on a fix? Certainly! >Error: Package: python34-xapps-overrides-1.0.4-13.el7.x86_64 (@epel) > Requires: xapps(x86-64) = 1.0.4-13.el7 > Removing: xapps-1.0.4-13.el7.x86_64 (@epel) > xapps(x86-64) = 1.0.4-13.el7 > Updated By:
2007 Jun 13
1
Tinc VPN
Hi. I am trying to build a license free VPN for a product of mine. The VPN should have the following features: 1. VPN client should be able to pierce through corporate firewalls to replicate database enteries from client ( running windows xp ) to server (running enterprise linux) 2. VPN client if not able to connect directly to server due to network congestion should be able to route traffic
2014 Sep 01
1
SIP Calls Not Working
Hello, I have two sip phones (zoiper). Earlier these used to communicate using the settings below for sip.conf and extensions.conf and now we asterisk 1.8.29.0, so these phones have stopped communicating. My question is that does 1.8.29.0 release require any more changes to be done to the sip.conf and extensions.conf to make the below work ? The sip.conf contains following enteries
2001 Feb 22
1
SMBD - NMBD problem
Hi guys, I realy need your help. It looks like SMBD doesn't want to talk with NMBD, but why? When I run the command: nmblookup torpc8 The result is: querying torpc8 on 10.5.255.255 Got a positive name query response from 10.5.2.27 ( 10.5.2.27 ) 10.5.2.27 torpc8<00> That is correct. When I run the command: smbclient -NL torpc8 The result is: resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for