Hi, I found out that a new version of ext3-2.4 was available from the previous messages on this list, despite the fact that no 'official' announce was given... I'm currently running 0.9.1 on 2.4.6-ac2 without problems. Should I upgrade to 0.9.2 (I suppose yes by reading the changelog :-)) ? What about the 0.9.3-pre version ? What does the -pre mean exactly (any incidence on the stability ? and what about the -ac version ?) Stelian. -- Stelian Pop <stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com> |---------------- Free Software Engineer -----------------| | Alcôve - http://www.alcove.com - Tel: +33 1 49 22 68 00 | |------------- Alcôve, liberating software ---------------|
Hi, On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Stelian Pop wrote:> > I found out that a new version of ext3-2.4 was available from > the previous messages on this list, despite the fact that > no 'official' announce was given... > > I'm currently running 0.9.1 on 2.4.6-ac2 without problems. Should > I upgrade to 0.9.2 (I suppose yes by reading the changelog :-)) ?You are unlikely to encounter the problem that 0.9.2 fixes, but feel free to upgrade if you want.> What about the 0.9.3-pre version ?There are ongoing cleanups and performance improvements being merged in. Any serious bug fixes will be announced here! Cheers, Stephen
Stelian Pop wrote:> > Hi, > > I found out that a new version of ext3-2.4 was available from > the previous messages on this list, despite the fact that > no 'official' announce was given...0.9.2 has been released ;)> I'm currently running 0.9.1 on 2.4.6-ac2 without problems. Should > I upgrade to 0.9.2 (I suppose yes by reading the changelog :-)) ?Depends how brave you are - 0.9.3-pre is a bit more experimental - I put it out for some performance testing. It's only been tested for a couple of hours here. Unless you're keen on stress-testing and benchmarks I'd recommend you stick with 0.9.2.