similar to: 3.0.0-beta3-rc1 ADS ticket problems

I've got samba-3.0.0-14.3E, and am trying to connect to a Windows 2000 domain using security = ADS After following the instructions in the Samba-HOWTO-Collection, I've got kinit working, and am able to browse the Windows 2000 machines shares with smbclient //win2kmixed/c\$ -k without a password. However, if I try to connect to the machine, either through network neighborhood or with (on

Samba doesn't allow connections from usernames that have & in them. For example, using 2.2.5 and winbind with security = DOMAIN password server = win2kmixed workgroup = MIXEDDOMAIN all my users can login, (for example MIXEDDOMAIN+aho, MIXEDDOMAIN+tdickson), but my users named "&" and "bobalso&" (which should be MIXEDDOMAIN+& and MIXEDDOMAIN+bobalso&)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry about that: enigmail got over excited! - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] Macro expansion in valid users = line? Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 13:15:42 -0700 From: Tom Dickson <tdickson@inostor.com> To: Gerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org> CC: samba mailing list <samba@lists.samba.org> References:

Hello! I'm running Samba 2.2.8a on top of a ext3 filesystem with ACLs enabled. (kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r2) With ACLs disabled (i.e., mount /dev/hdd1 /mnt/floppy (no -o ACL)), the Security box under windows 2000 works like I want it to with respect to the Everyone group; If I want the Linux permissions to be, say, 770 (rwxrwx---), I can select everyone and hit "Remove." The everyone

Hello, Is it possible to put %U or %S in the valid users line? I'm trying: valid users = %D+%U for a certain homedir setup (automagically creates if non-existent), but the level 10 logs show that it always tries: checking |MIXEDDOMAIN+dl| against |%D+%U|, and does not expand the macro. This is with Samba-3.0.0rc2 (happens with beta3 also.) Same thing happens with %U or %S. It worked in

Thanks for replying to my question. However, I am still confused. Rafal Szczesniak <mimir@samba.org> wrote: >On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:58:30AM -0700, Matt Seitz wrote: >> The Samba web site contains "The Samba Team announces Samba 3.0.0 >> beta3". This document includes a section titled "Trust Relationships >> and a Samba Domain". For

I installed samba 3.0.0 beta3 on FreeBSD 5.0 alpha RELEASE, with ./configure --with-ldapsam --with-quotas --prefix=/usr/local/ldapsamba, the smbd log told me this: 2003/08/07 07:37:29, 0] lib/module.c:smb_load_module(40) Error loading module '/usr/local/ldapsamba/lib/pdb/ldapsam.so': Cannot open "/usr/local/ldapsamba/lib/pdb/ldapsam.so" [2003/08/07 07:37:29, 0]

Hi, I was getting an odd error installing rails-3.0.0.beta3 on a fresh Ubuntu 10.04 install. The same exact error was occurring on my Ubuntu 9.10 install, so I''m sure it isn''t something specific to the Ubuntu version (nor beta for that matter). This is the error: mike@ubuntu:~/rubygems-1.3.6$ sudo gem1.9.1 install rails --pre Successfully installed activesupport-3.0.0.beta3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joining a mixed 2000 domain worked correctly for Samba 3.0.2a. After upgrading to either samba 3.0.9 or 3.0.10, the net ads join command completes successfully, and wbinfo -u returns a list of users, but any attempt to actually authenticate those users fails with NT_STATUS_PIPE_NOT_AVAILABLE. wbinfo -t also does not work, and produces the log file

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is this command secure? net ads password boba@MIXEDDOMAIN.LOCAL -UAdministrator@MIXEDDOMAIN.LOCAL You must supply an administrator username/password I don't want to put my administrator password on the command line; but it won't prompt me for it. Is there another way to use this functionality? Also, my administrator password cannot be typed

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the third (and possible last) beta release of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. While we are significantly closer to the final release, you should be reminded that this is a non-production release provided for testing only. If all goes well, we will move onto a series of Release Candidate (RC)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the third (and possible last) beta release of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. While we are significantly closer to the final release, you should be reminded that this is a non-production release provided for testing only. If all goes well, we will move onto a series of Release Candidate (RC)

I''ve always distrusted the ruby and rails installs on my Mac (oOS X 10.6.3) -- sudo gem cleanup can''t seem to get rid of old gem versions (lots of Gem::InstallError: cannot uninstall). Because of that, I don''t trust the rails beta3 install I just completed. Here''s the story: * config is Apple''s ruby 1.8.7 and gem 1.3.6. * xcode is installed from

I have a need to setup the recycle vfs object on our server. On my test server, I have all of the shares on a single drive and have put the following into each share: vfs_objects = recycle recycle:repository = [Actual Path and Partition that the share is located] recycle:directory_mode = 770 recycle:keeptree = Yes recycle:touch_mtime = Yes recycle:versions = Yes It works like a charm. All

Is the issue below addressed in 3.0.25b? (no freebsd port available yet so I'm still at 3.0.25a) I can't see anything specifically about this in the release notes. I just want to add that I've also seen this behaviour on a windows xp x64 client. It's a pretty serious problem.. so I'm also thinking I may have to revert to an earlier version if it doesn't look like a

Hello, everyone, I'm seeing some inconsistent behavior across SMB clients when configuring shares using the "msdfs proxy" parameter, and was hoping to get some advice from the community on this. My issue is that various SMB clients seem to behave differently when this parameter is pointed as a path that includes a sub-folder under the root share. So, given the following share

Hello all, Got samba with AD integration and extended ACL up and running. Here is what I am trying to do. share1 in smb.conf: [share1] comment = share1 path = /mnt/data/share1 public = no writable = yes printable = no valid users = @DOMAIN+group1 user1 and user2 are members of group1 user3 is not user1 creates

We restored to 3.0.23d after update to 3.0.25a because of strange dfs behavior. the detailed situation: on msdfs root server 'samba' ls -lR dfsroot/: drwxr-xr-x appl1 dfsroot/appl1 lrwxrwxrwx share1 -> msdfs:server1\share1 [dfs] comment = "SaMBa DFS root" path = /path.../dfsroot # next line does not work prior 3.0.25 !!! # hide unreadable = Yes

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 01:28:55PM -0500, Nick Couchman via samba wrote: >Hello, everyone, >I'm seeing some inconsistent behavior across SMB clients when >configuring shares using the "msdfs proxy" parameter, and was hoping >to get some advice from the community on this. My issue is that >various SMB clients seem to behave differently when this parameter is >pointed

Hello Jeremy, I think you missed a "/" in: mount --bind /share1/DVR /medium/DVR mount --bind /share1/Audio /medium/Audio mount --bind /share2/Video /medium/Video mount --bind /share2/Backups /medium/Backups BR, Matt On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jeremy Allison via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:45:16PM -0500, Hal Vaughan via samba